Feminism and bourdieusian social theory in a sexual health empowerment project with incarcerated and recently released women
Theory is often downplayed or omitted in the research and scholarly literature around public health interventions in carceral settings. Our sexual health empowerment (SHE) project was an education intervention and ethnographic study that aimed to reduce cervical cancer risk among women with histories of incarceration. In this article, we describe our application of concepts from feminist theory and bourdieusian social theory to the design, planning, and delivery of SHE. We outline how theory-driven practice both underscored and helped us meet challenges in implementation in three urban jails over a 2-year period, 2014–2016. Our approach provides a model for others who wish to bring critical theory and research practice together in health interventions with populations that are marginalized in multiple ways.
KeywordsFeminist theory Bourdieu Trauma Incarceration Reproductive health
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01 CA181047, (PI: M. Ramaswamy).
- Arditti, J.A. 2012. Parental Incarceration and the Family: Psychological and Social Effects of Imprisonment on Children, Parents, and Caregivers. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Battle, C.L., C. Zlotnick, L.M. Najavits, M. Gutierrez, and C. Winsor. 2003. Posttraumatic stress disorder and substance abuse disorder among incarcerated women. In Trauma and Substance Abuse: Causes, Consequences, and Treatment of Comorbid Disorders, ed. P. Ouimette, and P.J. Brown, 209–225. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Belknap, J. 2007. The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice. Belmont: Wadsworth-Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Binswanger, I.A., C. Nowels, K.F. Corsi, J. Long, R.E. Booth, J. Kutner, and J.F. Steiner. 2011. “From the prison door right to the sidewalk, everything went downhill,” a qualitative study of the health experiences of recently released inmates. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 34 (4): 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bloom, B., B. Owen, and S. Covington. 2002. Gender-Responsive Strategies: Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. J.E. Richardson, 241–258. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Covington, S. 2008. The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions, 2nd ed, ed. R.T. Zaplin, 135–164. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishing.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1): 139–167.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Foy, D.W., and L.C. Larson. 2014. Group therapies for trauma using cognitive-behavioral therapy. In Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Trauma, ed. V.M. Follette, and J.I. Ruzek, 388–404. Guilford: New York.Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. 2014. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Women, Science, and Technology, 3rd ed, ed. M. Wyer, M. Barbercheck, D. Cookmeyer, H. Ozturk, and M. Wayne, 455–472. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Harding, S. 2004. Thinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, ed. S.N. Hesse-Biber, and M.L. Yaiser, 39–64. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Herman, J.L. 1992. Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Jaggar, A.M. 2015. Feminist studies. In Just Methods: An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader, ed. A.M. Jaggar, 191–198. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Janoff-Bulman, R. 1992. Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Klugman, J., L. Hamner, and S. Twigg. 2014. Voice and Agency. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- Lipton, B. 2016. We Only Talk Feminist Here: Feminist Academics, Voice and Agency in the Neoliberal University. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
- Miller, J.B. 1986. Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
- Richie, B.E. 2013. Arrested Justice: Black Women, Violence, and America’s Prison Nation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Riley, D. 1987. Does a sex have a history? “Women” and feminism. New Formations 1: 35–45.Google Scholar
- Schlichter, A., and Eidsheim, N.S. 2014. Voice matters. Postmodern Culture, 24(3). Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/589565.
- Smith, D.E. 2004. Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. In Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, ed. S.N. Hesse-Biber, and M.L. Yaiser, 27–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sprague, J. 2005. Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.Google Scholar
- Sprague, J., and D. Kobrynowicz. 2004. A feminist epistemology. In Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, ed. S.N. Hesse-Biber, and M.L. Yaiser, 78–98. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Voorhis, P. 2014. Correctional Counseling and Rehabilitation, 8th ed. Portland: Ringgold Inc.Google Scholar
- Wright, E.M., Van Voorhis, P., Bauman, A., and Salisbury, E. 2008. Gender-Responsive Risk/Needs Assessment: Final Report. Criminal Justice Research Center. Retrieved from https://nicic.gov/assets/out.aspx?, http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/womenoffenders/docs/Minnesota%20final%20report%20web.pdf.