Abstract
The post-war introduction of new chemicals to consumer products created a range of complex environmental health issues. Despite recent evidence demonstrating the issues associated with using particular chemicals in the home, responses from industry and regulators have failed to account for the complex ways that chemicals interact with each other, humans and microorganisms to cause harm. This paper draws together the scientific and social science literature to make two key contributions: first, it demonstrates why investigating everyday practices will be crucial to improve knowledge of how human/environment interactions in the home are contributing to certain health conditions; second, it draws on examples of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals to show how these health conditions cannot be addressed by replacing individual products, or chemicals, as many toxic ingredients have become central to the functionality of interdependent networks of products, and the routines they enable. By failing to engage with these issues, future research and planning to establish healthy homes will not be able to account for these crucial sources of harm. We conclude that further research addressing indoor environmental health should expand the boundaries of inquiry across disciplines and knowledge perspectives to analyse how social practices structure micro-scale interactions between humans, microbes and chemicals, in the home.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The European Union’s REACH (Registration Evaluation Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) framework proposes to shift this ‘burden of proof’ to chemical manufactures and the industries that use them however, its capacity to protect people and the environment is from the vast array of chemicals in use is still unknown** Scruggs et al. (2014).
Chemists refer to identical molecular entities as ‘chemical species’.
Following Warde (2005), consumption is not understood to mean shopping, but the process by which items are appropriated in the course of engaging in particular practices. Consumption is therefore considered to be a dispersed practice that occurs often, on many different sites, rather than a practice in and of itself.
References
Adams, R.I., S. Bhangar, K.C. Dannemiller, J.A. Eisen, N. Fierer, J.A. Gilbert, J.L. Green, L.C. Marr, S.L. Miller, and J.A. Siegel. 2016. Ten questions concerning the microbiomes of buildings. Building and Environment 109: 224–234.
Altman, R.G., R. Morello-Frosch, J.G. Brody, R. Rudel, P. Brown, and M. Averick. 2008. Pollution comes home and gets personal: Women’s experience of household chemical exposure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 49: 417–435.
Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barnett, C., P. Cloke, N. Clarke, and A. Malpass. 2010. Globalizing responsibility: The political rationalities of ethical consumption. New York: Wiley.
Baumann, S., A. Engman, and J. Johnston. 2015. Political consumption, conventional politics, and high cultural capital. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 39: 413–421.
Bennett, J., P. Cheah, M.A. Orlie, and E. Grosz. 2010. New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Duke University Press.
Biesterbos, J.W., T. Dudzina, C.J. Delmaar, M.I. Bakker, F.G. Russel, N. von Goetz, P.T. Scheepers, and N. Roeleveld. 2013. Usage patterns of personal care products: Important factors for exposure assessment. Food and Chemical Toxicology 55: 8–17.
Boudia, S., and N. Jas. 2014. Powerless science?: Science and politics in a toxic world. New York: Berghahn Books.
Brown, N., and S. Nettleton. 2017. Bugs in the blog: Immunitary moralism in antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Social Theory & Health 15: 302–322.
Campbell, C. 2013. A critique of the consumption as communication thesis, 340. Buy this book: Studies in Advertising and Consumption.
Carbajo, J.B., J.A. Perdigón-Melón, A.L. Petre, R. Rosal, P. Letón, and E. García-Calvo. 2015. Personal care product preservatives: Risk assessment and mixture toxicities with an industrial wastewater. Water Research 72: 174–185.
Clayton, E.M.R., M. Todd, J.B. Dowd, and A.E. Aiello. 2011. The impact of bisphenol A and triclosan on immune parameters in the US population, NHANES 2003-2006. Environmental Health Perspectives 119: 390.
Dunn, R.R., N. Fierer, J.B. Henley, J.W. Leff, and H.L. Menninger. 2013. Home life: Factors structuring the bacterial diversity found within and between homes. PLoS ONE 8: e64133.
Evans, D. 2012. Beyond the throwaway society: Ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste. Sociology 46: 41–56.
Evans, D., D. Welch, and J. Swaffield. 2017. Constructing and mobilizing ‘the consumer’: Responsibility, consumption and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning A 49: 1396–1412.
Fam, D., J. Palmer, C. Riedy, and C. Mitchell. 2017. Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
Gosens, I., C.J. Delmaar, W. ter Burg, C. de Heer, and A.G. Schuur. 2014. Aggregate exposure approaches for parabens in personal care products: A case assessment for children between 0 and 3 years old. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 24: 208–214.
Granjou, C., and C. Phillips. 2018. Living and labouring soils: Metagenomic ecology and a new agricultural revolution? BioSocieties 1–23.
Ha, S., T. Seidle, and K.-M. Lim. 2016. Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals (K-REACH) and replacement, reduction or refinement best practices. Environmental Health and Toxicology 31
Heederik, D., and E. von Mutius. 2012. Does diversity of environmental microbial exposure matter for the occurrence of allergy and asthma? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 130: 44–50.
Hitchings, R. 2012. People can talk about their practices. Area 44: 61–67.
Ingold, T. 2016. Evolution and social life. Abingdon: Routledge.
Jack, T. 2013. Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. International Journal of Consumer Studies 37: 666–674.
Jack, T. 2017. Cleanliness and consumption: Exploring material and social structuring of domestic cleaning practices. International Journal of Consumer Studies 41: 70–78.
Keller, M., and R. Ruus. 2014. Pre-schoolers, parents and supermarkets: Co-shopping as a social practice. International Journal of Consumer Studies 38: 119–126.
Kessler, R. 2015. More than cosmetic changes: Taking stock of personal care product safety. Environmental Health Perspectives 123: A120.
Kirksey, E. 2015. Species: A praxiographic study. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21: 758–780.
Kirksey, S.E., and S. Helmreich. 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural anthropology 25: 545–576.
Koch, H.M., and A.M. Calafat. 2009. Human body burdens of chemicals used in plastic manufacture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 2063–2078.
Kuijer, L., and A.M. De Jong. 2011. Practice theory and human-centered design: A sustainable bathing example. Nordes (4)
Latour, B. 1992. 10 ‘‘Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a Few Mundane artifacts". In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225–228.
Liboiron, M. 2015. Redefining pollution and action: The matter of plastics. Journal of Material Culture: 1359183515622966.
Liljenquist, K., C.-B. Zhong, and A.D. Galinsky. 2010. The smell of virtue clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science 21: 381–383.
Lorenzen, J.A. 2012. Going green: The process of lifestyle change1. Sociological Forum 27: 94–116.
Loretz, L., A. Api, L. Babcock, L. Barraj, J. Burdick, K. Cater, G. Jarrett, S. Mann, Y. Pan, and T. Re. 2008. Exposure data for cosmetic products: Facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46: 1516–1524.
Luongo, J.C. 2016. Towards defining healthy buildings: Investigating the effect of building characteristics and interventions on indoor air microbial exposures and energy efficiency. Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder.
Lush. 2016. Liquid soap vs. solid soap. https://www.lushusa.com/Liquid-Soap-vs.-Solid-Soap/Article_Liquid-Soap-Vs-Solid-Soap,en_US,pg.html?fid=tips-tricks. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.
Lynch, S.V., R.A. Wood, H. Boushey, L.B. Bacharier, G.R. Bloomberg, M. Kattan, G.T. O’Connor, M.T. Sandel, A. Calatroni, and E. Matsui. 2014. Effects of early-life exposure to allergens and bacteria on recurrent wheeze and atopy in urban children. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 134 (593–601): e12.
Mackendrick, N. 2014. More work for mother: Chemical body burdens as a maternal responsibility. Gender & Society 28: 705–728.
Mackendrick, N., and L.M. Stevens. 2016. “Taking back a little bit of control”: Managing the contaminated body through consumption. Sociological Forum, 2016. Wiley Online Library, New York.
Miller, D. 2010. Stuff. Cambridge: Polity.
Moncure, K.P. 2016. Inverted quarantine: Individual response to collective fear. Oberlin: Oberlin College.
Muncke, J. 2011. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and other substances of concern in food contact materials: An updated review of exposure, effect and risk assessment. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 127: 118–127.
Münster, D. 2017. Zero budget natural farming and bovine entanglements in South India. RCC Perspectives 1: 25–32.
Mylan, J., and D. Southerton. 2017. The social ordering of an everyday practice: The case of laundry. Sociology: 0038038517722932.
Olsson, M. 2014. The cost of inaction: A socioeconomic analysis of costs linked to effects of endocrine disrupting substances on male reproductive health, Nordic Council of Ministers.
Ott, W.R., A.C. Steinemann, and L.A. Wallace. 2006. Exposure analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Ouimette, M.Y. 2011. Cleaning house: Considerations of ecological health and sustainability in the selection of household cleaning products. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Park, M. 2016. Defying obsolescence. Longer Lasting Products. Abingdon: Routledge.
Patterson, M., and J. Johnston. 2012. Theorizing the obesity epidemic: Health crisis, moral panic and emerging hybrids. Social Theory & Health 10: 265–291.
Petersen, A.R. 1996. Risk and the regulated self: The discourse of health promotion as politics of uncertainty. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 32: 44–57.
Pink, S. 2015. Doing sensory ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pullinger, M., A. Browne, B. ANDERSON, and W. Medd. 2013. Patterns of water: The water related practices of households in southern England, and their influence on water consumption and demand management.
Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–263.
Reuben, S. 2010. Reducing environmental cancer risk: What we can do now. President’s Cancer Panel, Annual Report 2008-2009.
Rochester, J.R., and A.L. Bolden. 2015. Bisphenol S and F: A systematic review and comparison of the hormonal activity of bisphenol A substitutes. Environmental Health Perspectives (Online) 123: 643.
Rudel, R.A., and L.J. Perovich. 2009. Endocrine disrupting chemicals in indoor and outdoor air. Atmospheric Environment 43: 170–181.
Sarantis, H. 2010. Not so sexy: The health risks of secret chemicals in fragrance. Breast Cancer Fund CaEWG.
Schatzki, T.R. 1996. Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T.R., K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny. 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. Hove: Psychology Press.
Schug, T., R. Abagyan, B. Blumberg, T. Collins, D. Crews, P. Defur, S. Dickerson, T. Edwards, A. Gore, and L. Guillette. 2013. Designing endocrine disruption out of the next generation of chemicals. Green Chemistry 15: 181–198.
Scott, D.N., J. Haw, and R. Lee. 2017. ‘Wannabe Toxic-Free?’ From precautionary consumption to corporeal citizenship. Environmental Politics 26: 322–342.
Scott, K., C. Bakker, and J. Quist. 2012. Designing change by living change. Design Studies 33: 279–297.
Scruggs, C.E., L. Ortolano, M.R. Schwarzman, and M.P. Wilson. 2014. The role of chemical policy in improving supply chain knowledge and product safety. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4: 132–141.
Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.
Shove, E. 2004. Sustainability, system innovation and the laundry. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy 76–94.
Shove, E. 2007a. The design of everyday life. Oxford: Berg.
Shove, E. 2007b. The materials of material culture: Plastic. In The design of everyday life. Oxford: Berg.
Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Shove, E., and A. Warde. 2002. Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption, lifestyles and the environment. Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights 230: 51.
Silbergeld, E.K., D. Mandrioli, and C.F. Cranor. 2015. Regulating chemicals: Law, science, and the unbearable burdens of regulation. Annual Review of Public Health 36: 175–191.
Spurling, N.J., A. Mcmeekin, D. Southerton, E.A. Shove, and Welch, D. 2013. Interventions in practice: reframing policy approaches to consumer behaviour. Sustainable Practices Research Group.
Steinemann, A., P. Wargocki, and B. Rismanchi. 2017. Ten questions concerning green buildings and indoor air quality. Building and Environment 112: 351–358.
Stokols, D. 2014. Training the next generation of transdisciplinarians. Enhancing Communication & Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research 56–81.
Strengers, Y. 2010. Conceptualising everyday practices: Composition, reproduction and change. Carbon Neutral Communities Working Paper.
Strengers, Y. 2011. Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback. Journal of Consumer Culture 11: 319–338.
Strengers, Y., and C. Maller. 2012. Materialising energy and water resources in everyday practices: Insights for securing supply systems. Global Environmental Change 22: 754–763.
Strengers, Y., and C. Maller. 2014. Social practices, intervention and sustainability: Beyond behaviour change. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sutton, P., D. Wallinga, J. Perron, M. Gottlieb, L. Sayre, and T. Woodruff. 2011. Reproductive health and the industrialized food system: A point of intervention for health policy. Health Affairs 30: 888–897.
Szasz, A. 2007. Shopping our way to safety how we changed from protecting the environment to protecting ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Verbeek, D., and H. Mommaas. 2008. Transitions to sustainable tourism mobility: The social practices approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 16: 629–644.
von Goetz, N., M. Wormuth, M. Scheringer, and K. Hungerbühler. 2010. Bisphenol A: How the most relevant exposure sources contribute to total consumer exposure. Risk Analysis 30: 473–487.
Wahlen, S. 2011. The routinely forgotten routine character of domestic practices. International Journal of Consumer Studies 35: 507–513.
Wakefield-Rann, R. 2017. More than skin deep: A service design approach to making the luxury personal care industry more sustainable. In Sustainable management of luxury. Springer, New York.
Warde, A. 2005. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of consumer culture 5: 131–153.
Waterton, C., and J. Tsouvalis. 2015. On the political nature of cyanobacteria: Intra-active collective politics in Loweswater, the English Lake District. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33: 477–493.
Weschler, C.J. 2009. Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmospheric Environment 43: 153–169.
Williams, G.H. 2003. The determinants of health: Structure, context and agency. Sociology of Health & Illness 25: 131–154.
Wilson, N.K., J.C. Chuang, C. Lyu, R. Menton, and M.K. Morgan. 2003. Aggregate exposures of nine preschool children to persistent organic pollutants at day care and at home. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 13: 187–202.
Yang, C.Z., S.I. Yaniger, V.C. Jordan, D.J. Klein, and G.D. Bittner. 2011. Most plastic products release estrogenic chemicals: A potential health problem that can be solved. Environmental Health Perspectives 119: 989.
Žalmanová, T., K. Hošková, J. Nevoral, Š. Prokešová, K. Zámostná, T. Kott, and J. Petr. 2016. Bisphenol S instead of bisphenol A: A story of reproductive disruption by regretable substitution–a review. Czech Journal of Animal Science 61: 433–449.
Zimmerman, J.B., and P.T. Anastas. 2015. Toward substitution with no regrets. Science 347: 1198–1199.
Zoeller, R.T., T. Brown, L. Doan, A. Gore, N. Skakkebaek, A. Soto, T. Woodruff, and F. vom Saal. 2012. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: A statement of principles from The Endocrine Society. Endocrinology 153: 4097–4110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wakefield-Rann, R., Fam, D. & Stewart, S. Routine exposure: social practices and environmental health risks in the home. Soc Theory Health 18, 299–316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-00084-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-00084-8