Skip to main content
Log in

“The final arbiter of everything”: a genealogy of concern with patient experience in Britain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Theory & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Patient experience’ has become a significant concept in contemporary healthcare administration and policy, and the object of a good deal of caring and useful concern. Yet it is also a concept somehow rather set adrift. This article traces six different factors that have contributed to concern with patient experience, but that now lead to tensions between the multiple, potentially contradictory investments in the concept. Disentangling the different investments in the idea of patient experience offers greater clarity in evaluating criticisms that have been made of the solicitation and reporting of patient (and carer) experience data and affords an opportunity to examine what is at stake in both conceptual and policy discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley, L., H. Jones, J. Thomas, et al. 2013. Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15: e230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asprey, A., J.L. Campbell, J. Newbould, et al. 2013. Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice 63: 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aujoulat, I., W. d’Hoore, and A. Deccache. 2007. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Patient Education and Counseling 66 (1): 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggott, R. 2005. A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHS in England. Public Administration 83 (3): 533–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., and P. Cotterell (eds.). 2012. Critical Perspectives on User Involvement. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H.E., J.L. Campbell, A. Asprey, and S.H. Richards. 2016. The use of patient experience survey data by out-of-hours primary care services: A qualitative interview study. BMJ Quality & Safety. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. 2014. The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 31 (3): 388–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BMJ Roundtable. 2015. How can we get better at providing patient centred care? 350: H412. http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h412.

  • Boiko, O., J.L. Campbell, N. Elmore, et al. 2015. The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement. Health Expectations 18 (6): 1982–1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, M. 2016. Ideologies of Experience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. 2001. The Final Report. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Social Attitudes. 2015. British Social Attitudes Survey 32. http://bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/38978/bsa32_politics.pdf.

  • Burt, J., G. Abel, N. Elmore, C. Lloyd, J. Benson, L. Sarson, et al. 2016a. Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: An experimental vignette study. British Medical Journal Open 6 (9): e011256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J., C. Lloyd, J. Campbell, M. Roland, and G. Abel. 2016b. Variations in GP–patient communication by ethnicity, age, and gender: Evidence from a national primary care patient survey. British Journal of General Practice 66 (642): e47–e52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. 2010. ‘PM’s Podcast on Transparency’, 29 May. Date accessed 25th July 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pms-podcast-on-transparency.

  • Clarke, J., J. Newman, N. Smith, E. Vidler, and L. Westmarland. 2007. Creating Citizen Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, T.S., and L.F. Barrett. 2012. Trends in ambulatory self-report: The role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine 74 (4): 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contandriopoulos, D., F. Champagne, and J.L. Denis. 2014. The multiple causal pathways between performance measures’ use and effects. Medical Care Research and Review 71 (1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A., L. Locock, S. Ziebland, and J. Calabrese. 2014. Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: They must be used to improve care. BMJ 348: g2225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. 2016. The Value of Patient Experience. Accessed on the 29th January. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/life-sciences-health-care/lchs-the-value-of-patient-experience.pdf.

  • Department of Health. 2008. High Quality Care For All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. 2011. The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2012/13. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. 2014. The NHS Outcomes Framework 2015/16. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. 2015. A Mandate from the Government to NHS England: April 2015 to March 2016. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K.J., K. Walker, and J. Duff. 2015. Instruments to measure the inpatient hospital experience: A literature review. Patient Experience Journal 2 (2): 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Turabi, A., G.A. Abel, M. Roland, and G. Lyratzopoulos. 2013. Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: Evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. British Journal of Cancer 109 (3): 780–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M., D. Kanouse, Q. Burkhart, G. Abel, G. Lyratzopoulos, M. Beckett, M. Schuster, and M. Roland. 2015. Sexual minorities in England experience poorer health and worse health care: Results from a national survey of adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine 310: 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. 1995. The construction of lay expertise: Aids activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology and Human Values 20 (4): 408–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C., J. Burt, O. Boiko, J. Campbell, and M. Roland. 2016. Doctors’ engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care: A qualitative study. Health Expectations 20 (3): 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flott, K.M., C. Graham, A. Darzi, and E. Mayer. 2016. Can we use patient-reported feedback to drive change? BMJ Quality & Safety. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1988. The concern for truth. In Politics, Philosophy, Culture, ed. L.D. Kritzman, 255–270. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N.J., K.J. Ward, and A.J. O’Rourke. 2005. The “expert patient”: Empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine 60 (6): 1299–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. 2013. Report of the Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, C.H., Y.W. Lim, S. Mattke, et al. 2008. Systematic review: The evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Annals of Internal Medicine 148: 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P., J. Maben, and T. Murrells. 2011. Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: Observational study using routinely collected data. International Journal of Nursing Studies 48 (10): 1199–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Foundation. 2015. Indicators of Quality of Care in General Practices in England. London: The Health Foundation. Date accessed 25th July 2016. www.health.org.uk/publication/indicators-quality-care-general-practicesengland.

  • House of Commons Health Committee. 2016. Primary Care Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. 2005. Songs of Experience. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolandaivelu, K., B.B. Leiden, P.T. O’Gara, and D.L. Bhatt. 2014. Non-adherence to cardiovascular medications. European Heart Journal 35 (46): 3267–3276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansley, A. 2010. 8 June 2010: Secretary of State for Health’s speech‘My ambition for patient-centred care’. Date accessed 25th July 2016. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/Speeches/DH_116643.

  • Llanwarne, N., J. Newbould, J. Burt, J.L. Campbell, and M. Roland. 2017. Wasting the doctor’s time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care. Social Science and Medicine 176: 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locker, D., and D. Dunt. 1978. Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. Social Science and Medicine 12: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., and K. Wegrich. 2015. Crowdsourcing and regulatory reviews: A new way of challenging red tape in British government? Regulation & Governance 9 (1): 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D., C. Donaldson, and P. Lloyd. 1991. Caveat emptor or blissful ignorance? Patients and the consumerist ethos. Social Science and Medicine 33 (5): 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyratzopoulos, G., M. Elliott, J.M. Barbiere, A. Henderson, L. Staetsky, C. Paddison, J. Campbell, and M. Roland. 2012. Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. BMJ Quality & Safety 21: 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, R.J., J. Mant, M.S. Haque, et al. 2014. Effect of self-monitoring and medication self-titration on systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: The TASMIN-SR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312 (8): 799–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, D. 1996. Changing medical organization and the erosion of trust. The Milbank Quarterly 74 (2): 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mold, A. 2015. Making British patients into consumers. Lancet 385 (9975): 1286–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monitor. 2015. Improving GP Services: Commissioners and Patient Choice. London: Monitor.

  • Mottier, V. 2008. Metaphors, mini-narratives and Foucauldian discourse theory. In Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, ed. T. Carver, and J. Pikalo, 282–294. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, S.A., S.A. Lewin, H.J. Smith, et al. 2007. Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Medicine 4: e238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagraj, S., G. Abel, C. Paddison, et al. 2013. Changing practice as a quality indicator for primary care. BMC Family Practice 14 (1): 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., and E. Vidler. 2006. Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: Consumerism and the modernisation of health care. Journal of Social Policy 35 (2): 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. 2014. The Friends and Family Test. Publications Gateway Ref No. 01787. Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/fft-imp-guid-14.pdf.

  • England, N.H.S. 2015. New Care Models: Empowering patients and communities. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. 2016a. Awards Showcase Array of NHS Improvements Arising from Patient Feedback. Date accessed 25th July 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2016/03/fft-awards-patient-feedback/.

  • England, N.H.S. 2016. General Practice: Forward View. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. 2017. FFT Collection Overview. Date accessed 27th April 2017. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/fft/.

  • NHS Choices. 2016. Traffic Report. Date accessed 25th July 2016. http://www.nhs.uk/aboutNHSChoices/aboutnhschoices/Documents/2015-NHSC-traffic-report.pdf.

  • Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2008. National and Cross-National Surveys of Patient Experiences: A Structured Review. Date accessed 25th July 2016. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/39493930.pdf.

  • Ocloo, J., and R. Matthews. 2016. From tokenism to empowerment: Progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety 25: 626–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., P.K.C. Gupta, C.M.J. White, A.G. Stanley, B. Williams, and M. Tomaszewski. 2016. Screening for non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment as a part of the diagnostic pathway to renal denervation. Journal of Human Hypertension 30 (6): 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, V., J. Thompson, J. Jabbal, et al. 2015. Patients’ Experience of using Hospital Services. London: King’s Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renedo, A., A. Komporozos-Athanasiou, and C. Marston. 2017. Experience as evidence: The dialogic construction of health professional knowledge through patient involvement. Sociology. doi:10.1177/0038038516682457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K.J. 1999. Patient empowerment in the United States: A critical commentary. Health Expectations 2 (2): 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., A. Kennedy, P. Bower, C. Gardner, C. Gately, V. Lee, et al. 2008. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: Results and implications from a national evaluation. Medical Journal of Australia 189 (10): S21–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, M., and R.A. Dudley. 2015. How financial and reputational incentives can be used to improve medical care. Health Services Research 50 (S2): 2090–2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C.K., G. Frommelt, L. Hazelwood, and R.W. Chang. 1987. The Role of Expectations in Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care. Journal of Health Care Marketing 7 (4): 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotar, A.M., M.J. van den Berg, D.S. Kringos, and N. Klazinga. 2016. Reporting and use of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators at national and regional level in 15 countries. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 28 (3): 398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, C., M. Wallace, and A.A. Montgomery. 2010. Patients’ experience and satisfaction in primary care: Secondary analysis using multilevel modelling. BMJ 341: c5004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C.L., G.A. Abel, and G. Lyratzopoulos. 2015. Inequalities in reported cancer patient experience by socio-demographic characteristic and cancer site: Evidence from respondents to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey. European Journal of Cancer Care 24: 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, M., R. Grob, and D. Shaller. 2016. Using Patient-Reported Information to Improve Clinical Practice. Health Services Research 50 (Suppl 2): 2116–2154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. 2015. The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency, 1945–1975. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, L., C. Marsh, J. O’Hara, G. Armitage, J. Wright, and R. Lawton. 2017. The Patient Feedback Response Framework-Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback. Social Science and Medicine 178: 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlov, A.R., J.E. Ware, S. Greenfield, E.C. Nelson, J. Perrin, and M. Zubkoff. 1989. The medical outcomes study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (7): 925–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tritter, J.Q., and M. Koivusalo. 2013. Undermining patient and public engagement and limiting its impact. Health Expectations 16 (2): 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, B. 2014. The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society. History and Philosophy of Science 23 (3): 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, A.H. 2016. “Constrained collaboration”: Patient empowerment discourse as a resource for countervailing power. Sociology of Health & Illness 38 (8): 1364–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, F.C., G. Abel, G. Lyratzopoulos, et al. 2015. Characteristics of service users and provider organisations associated with experience of out of hours general practitioner care in England. BMJ 350: h2040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wensing, M., H.P. Jung, J. Mainz, F. Olesen, and R. Grol. 1998. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Social Science and Medicine 47 (10): 1573–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., J. Coyle, and D. Healy. 1998. The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Social Science and Medicine 47: 1351–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.E., L.M. Rhudy, B.A. Ballinger, et al. 2013. Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU. Intensive Care Medicine 39 (6): 1009–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, B. 2015. The impact of open data in the UK. Public Administration 93 (3): 788–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziebland, S., and K. Hunt. 2014. Using secondary analysis of qualitative data of patient experiences of health care to inform health services research and policy. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 19 (3): 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robbie Duschinsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duschinsky, R., Paddison, C. “The final arbiter of everything”: a genealogy of concern with patient experience in Britain. Soc Theory Health 16, 94–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-017-0045-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-017-0045-2

Keywords

Navigation