Advertisement

Social Theory & Health

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 436–457 | Cite as

Bureaucratically distorted communication: The case of managed mental health care

  • Jeremiah C. MorelockEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Mental health treatment providers today are subject to insurance company regulation. Using grounded theory to analyze 33 interviews of treatment providers, I portray this regulation as a form of surveillance that operates through discourse, and ask how treatment providers communicate with and through this system. My findings reveal that mental health treatment providers are required to deliver information to insurers within a rationalized medical discourse that is supposed to represent treatment, but is inadequate for the task. I argue this bureaucratic system demands that providers communicate with insurers in a distorted way. These findings are theorized in dialogue with Habermas’ communication typology and his theory of lifeworld colonization. I argue that the case of managed mental health care presents an arena of communication and colonization which is best suited by building from the Habermasian framework. Colonization occurs, yet on within a specific channel of communication, despite pretensions of thoroughgoing colonization. Systematically generated communicative distortions occur, but often without necessarily involving self-deceptions or strategic private agendas. This paper contributes to Habermasian theory by suggesting it could be further elaborated upon to account in for forms of colonization and distorted communication that occur in varied social contexts.

Keywords

healthcare mental health discourse surveillance Habermas 

References

  1. Adorno, T.W. (1973) Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Bevir, M. (1999) Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies 47(2): 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boxenbaum, E. and Jonsson, S. (2008) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 78–98). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. and Bryant, A. (2007) The coding process and its challenges. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Collinson, D. (2014) Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership 10(1): 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G. (1992) Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3–7.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1978) Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (1982) Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Field, M.J. and Gray, B.H. (1989) Controlling Costs and Changing Patient Care? The Role of Utilization Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  11. Freidson, E. (1988) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1970) On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry 13, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1985) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, H.K. and Flyverbom, M. (2015) The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization 22(6): 872–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iedema, R. and Rhodes, C. (2010) The undecided space of ethics in organizational surveillance. Organization Studies 31(2): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyon, D. (2007) Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lyotard, J.F. (1988) The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. McCarthy, T. (1981) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Boston: MIT.Google Scholar
  21. McKinlay, J.B. and Stoeckle, J.D. (1988) Corporatization and the social transformation of doctoring. International Journal of Health Services 18(2): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morse, J.M. (2010) Sampling in grounded theory. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 229–244). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Orton, J.D. and Weick, K. (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203–223.Google Scholar
  25. Ritzer, G. and Walczak, D. (1988) Rationalization and the deprofessionalization of physicians. Social Forces 67(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sahlin, K. and Wedlin, L. (2008) Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–242). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Scheid, T.L. (2003) Managed care and the rationalization of mental health services. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44(2): 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlesinger, M.J., Gray, B.H. and Perreira, K.M. (1997) Medical professionalism under managed care: The pros and cons of utilization review. Health Affairs 16(1): 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, W.R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P.J. and Caronna, C.A. (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Timmermans, S. and Kolker, E.S. (2004) Evidence-based medicine and the reconfiguration of medical knowledge. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45(Extra Issue): 177–193.Google Scholar
  31. Timmons, S. (2003) A failed panopticon: Surveillance of nursing practice via new technology. New Technology, Work and Employment 18(2): 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ware, N.C., Lachicotte, W.S., Kirschner, S.R., Cortes, D.E. and Good, B.J. (2000) Clinician experiences of managed mental health care: A rereading of the threat. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 14(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weick, K.E. (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whooley, O. (2010) Diagnostic ambivalence: Psychiatric workarounds and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Sociology of Health & Illness 32(3): 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations