Skip to main content
Log in

Community perceptions of private security at a mega-event

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pluralisation of policing has caused much debate in criminology. Yet very few studies examine how the public perceive private security. This article addresses this gap by drawing on empirical qualitative data from the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. It makes an empirical contribution to the existing mega-events literature by showing how local residents from a community perceived private security within the context of their everyday environment. Findings show that perceptions of private security were overall negative. This was attributed to a perceived lack of local knowledge, perceived lack of professional expertise, perceived poor communication, and perceived authoritarianism among security actors. Such findings raise important implications regarding the normative legitimacy of private security at mega-events and society more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, Adam. 2021. Seeking invention: Creating an informed citizenry in the governance of security at sporting mega-events. Policing and Society 31 (3): 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1741586.

  • Audit Scotland. 2015. ‘Commonwealth Games’. Third Report Aavailable at: https://www.auditscotland.gov.uk/docs/central/2015/nr_150312_commonwealth_games_third.pdf (Accessed Dec 4, 2016).

  • Bakreski, Oliver. 2019. The role of private security in the protection of critical infrastructure in urban areas. Security Dialogues 2: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. 2012. Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games Security Cost up 200%. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-20769485 (Accessed July 7, 2016).

  • Beetham David. 1991. The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Bennett, Colin J., and Kevin, Haggerty. ed. 2011. Security games: Surveillance and control at mega-events. In Security games: Surveillance and control at mega-events,  1–19. Oxon: Routledge.

  • Boyle, Philip, and Kevin D. Haggerty. 2009. Spectacular security: Mega-events and the security complex. International Political Sociology 3 (3): 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Philip. 2011. Knowledge networks: Mega-events and security-expertise. In Security Games: Surveillance and Control at Mega-Events, ed. J. Bennett. Colin and D. Haggerty. Kevin, 169–184. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, Jean Paul. 2010. The Policing Web, 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Button, Mark. 2004. ”Softly, Softly", private security and the policing of corporate space. In Hard Cop, Soft Cop: Dilemmas and Debates in Contemporary Policing, ed. Roger Hopkins Burke, 101–113. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, Mark. 2007. Security Officers and Policing. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, Mark. 2008. Doing Security, 1st ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Adam. 2003. Contractual governance of deviant behaviour. Journal of Law & Society 30 (4): 479–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, Jon, and David Murakami Wood. 2006. Security is coming home: Rethinking scale and constructing resilience in the global urban response to terrorist risk. International Relations 20 (4): 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, Jon, P. Fussey, and C. Moore. 2011. Laminated Security for London 2012: Enhancing security infrastructures to defend mega sporting events. Urban Studies 48 (15): 3311–3327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Samantha. 2013. ‘Glasgow 2014 and Police Scotland Call For Private Security Input’. Campaignlive.Co.Uk. https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/glasgow-2014-police-scotland-call-private-security-input/1221452.

  • Eick, Volker. 2011. Lack of legacy? Shadows of surveillance after the 2006 FIFA world cup In Germany. Urban Studies 48 (15): 3329–3345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon, Wendy, and John Lea. 2017. Privatization and coercion: The question of legitimacy. Theoretical Criminology 22 (4): 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussey, Pete. 2015. Command, control and contestation: Negotiating security at the London 2012 olympics. The Geographical Journal 181 (3): 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussey, Pete, and Francisco Klauser. 2015. Securitisation and the mega-event: An editorial introduction. The Geographical Journal 181 (3): 194–198.

  • Fussey, Peter, Jon Coaffee, Gary Armstrong, and Dick Hobbs. 2011. Securing and Sustaining The Olympic City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussey, Pete, and Jon Coaffee. 2012. Balancing local and global security leitmotifs: Counter-terrorism and the spectacle of sporting mega-events. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 47 (3): 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goold, Benjamin, Ian Loader, and Angélica Thumala. 2013. The banality of security: The curious case of surveillance cameras. British Journal of Criminology 53 (6): 977–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giulianotti, Richard, and Francisco Klauser. 2009. Security governance and sport mega-events: toward an interdisciplinary research agenda. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 34 (1): 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herald Scotland. 2014. ‘17 Private Companies To Provide Security, Stewarding At Glasgow 2014’. https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/13162843.17-private-companies-to-provide-security-stewarding-at-glasgow-2014/ (accessed November 24, 2014).

  • Löfstrand, Hansen, Bethan Loftus Cecilia, and Ian Loader. 2016. Doing ‘Dirty Work’: Stigma and esteem in the private security industry. European Journal of Criminology 13 (3): 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstrand, Hansen, Bethan Loftus Cecilia, and Ian Loader. 2017. Private security as moral drama: A tale of two scandals. Policing and Society 28 (8): 968–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houilihan, Barrie, and Richard Giulianotti. 2012. Politics and The London 2012 olympics: The (In)security games. International Affairs 88 (4): 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Gordon. 2007. The Politics of Crime and Community. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Les, and Clifford Shearing. 2003. Governing Security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammersgaard, Tobias. 2021. Private security guards policing public space: Using soft power in place of legal authority. Policing and Society 31 (2): 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1688811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hyunho, Mark Button, and Julak Lee. 2018. Public perceptions of private security in shopping malls: A comparison of The United Kingdom And South Korea. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 53: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauser, Francisco R. 2015. Interacting forms of expertise and authority in mega-event security: The example of the 2010 Vancouver olympic games. The Geographical Journal 181 (3): 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, Ken, and Jerry Hart. 2003. The wrong arm of the law? Public images of private security. Policing and Society 13 (2): 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, Ian. 1997. Policing and the social: Questions of symbolic power. The British Journal of Sociology 48 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/591907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, Ian. 2000. Plural policing and democratic governance. Social & Legal Studies 9 (3): 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, Ian, and Neil Walker. 2007. Civilizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, Ian, Benjamin Goold, and Angélica Thumala. 2014. The moral economy of security. Theoretical Criminology 18 (4): 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, Adam. 2015. The geo-historical legacies of urban security governance and the vancouver 2010 olympics. The Geographical Journal 181 (3): 235–241.

  • Molnar, Adam, Chad Whelan, and Philip Boyle. 2018. Securing the Brisbane 2014 G20 in the wake of the Toronto 2010 G20: ‘Failure-inspired’ Learning in Public Order Policing. The British Journal of Criminology 59 (1): 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey. 2012. Against Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalla, Mahesh K., and Cedrick G. Heraux. 2003. Assessing goals and functions of private police. Journal of Criminal Justice 31 (3): 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalla, Mahesha K.., and SylviaS.. Lim. 2003. Students’ perceptions of private police in Singapore. Asian Policing 1: 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noaks, Lesley. 2000. Private cops on the block: A review of the role of private security in residential communities. Policing and Society 10 (2): 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, Kirsteen, Vikki McCall, and Gerry Mooney. 2017. Place revisited: class, stigma and urban restructuring in the case of Glasgow’s commonwealth games. The Sociological Review 65 (4): 578–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samatas, Minas. 2011. Surveillance in Athens 2004 and Beijing 2008: A comparison of the olympic surveillance modalities and legacies in two different olympic host regimes. Urban Studies 48 (15): 3347–3366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, Rick, and Tim Prenzler. 2009. The Law Of Private Security In Australia. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, Rick. and Prenzler, T. 2011. Private security and public interest: Exploring private security trends and directions for reform in the new era of plural policing. Sydney: ARC Report.

  • Shearing, Clifford D., Philip Stenning, and SusanM. Addario. 1985. Public perceptions of private security. Canadian Police College Journal 9: 225–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Martin J., and Adam White. 2014. The paradox of security regulation: Public protection versus normative legitimation. Policy & Politics 42 (3): 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312x655495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Mark C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.

  • Thumala, Angélica, Benjamin Goold, and Ian Loader. 2011. A tainted trade? Moral ambivalence and legitimation work in the private security industry. The British Journal of Sociology 62 (2): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Steden, Ronald , and MaheshK.. Nalla. 2010. Citizen satisfaction with private security guards in The Netherlands: Perceptions of an ambiguous occupation. European Journal of Criminology 7 (3): 214–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, Alison. 2003. Selling Security—The Private Policing of Public Space. Collumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, Chad. 2014. Surveillance, security and sports mega events: toward a research agenda on the organisation of security networks. Surveillance & Society 11 (4): 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, Chad, and Benoît Dupont. 2017. Taking stock of networks across the security field: A review, typology and research agenda. Policing and Society 27 (6): 671–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, Chad, and Adam Molnar. 2018. Securing Mega-Events: Networks, Strategies and Tensions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, Adam. 2010. The Politics Of Private Security: Regulation, Reform and Re-legitimation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, Adam. 2017. Beyond Iraq. Armed Forces & Society 44 (3): 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J., and C. Shearing. 2007. Imagining Security. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yar, Majid. 2011. From the ‘governance of security’ to ‘governance failure’: Refining the criminological agenda. Internet Journal of Criminology 2011: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. 2006. Liquid security: Managing the market for crime control. Criminology and Criminal Justice 6: 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the two anonymous referees for their informative and constructive comments.

Funding

This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council and Scottish Government [Grant Number 1624849].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Aitken.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that this submission is original, is not under consideration elsewhere and that there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aitken, A. Community perceptions of private security at a mega-event. Secur J 35, 987–1005 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00309-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00309-y

Keywords

Navigation