Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vehicles of control: the securitisation of surveillant automobility in the United Kingdom

Security Journal volume 35, pages 38–58 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper explores how in the United Kingdom, traffic regulatory systems, cars, and our culture of automobility have been subsumed within a security agenda. Scholars have begun to examine the overlaps between mobilities and security studies, particularly in the context of topics such as migration and terrorism, framing security as a prerequisite to automobility. But little security-mobility research explores how drivers, and the population at large, are themselves securitised through institutions of automobility. The paper details how “surveillant automobility” has manifested in the seemingly mundane traffic systems of the UK, and the deficient transparency and accountability these systems afford. This paper uses government statistics and industry data to support an interdisciplinary theoretical approach, combining mobilities, security, regulatory and Foucauldian approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Aradau, C. 2010. Security that matters: critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue 41 (5): 491–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R.F. 2004. A history of popular culture: more of everything, faster, and brighter. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, S., C. Jones, C. Land, and M. Paterson. 2006. Introduction: impossibilities of automobility. The Sociological Review 54 (1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. 2009. Automobile advertisements: the magical and the mundane. In Car troubles: critical studies of automobility and auto-mobility, ed. J. Conley and A.T. McLaren, 37–58. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J., and A.T. McLaren (eds.). 2009. Car troubles: critical studies of automobility and auto-mobility. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A., and S. Hutchinson. 2016. Mapping the contours of ‘everyday security’: time, space and emotion. The British Journal of Criminology 56 (6): 1184–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth. 2006. Interoperability of police databases within the EU: an accountable political choice? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 20 (1–2): 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. 1998. Driving forces: the automobile, its enemies, and the politics of mobility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, B. 2004. Security in the age of networks. Policing and Society 14 (1): 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellaway, A., S. Macintyre, R. Hiscock, and A. Kearns. 2003. In the driving seat: psychosocial benefits from private motor vehicle transport compared to public transport. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour 6 (3): 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R.V., and K.D. Haggerty. 1997. Policing the risk society. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R.V., and K.D. Haggerty. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., and R. Brown. 1980s. On the origins of the crime drop: vehicle crime and security in the 1980s. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 55 (1–2): 226–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., A. Tseloni, and N. Tilley. 2011. The effectiveness of vehicle security devices and their role in the crime drop. Criminology and Criminal Justice 11 (1): 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, S.A., A.P. Hardy, and A.F. Williams. 2003. Content analysis of television advertising for cars and minivans: 1983–1998. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35 (6): 825–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population: lectures at the College De France 1977–1978. Ed. Senellart, M. Trans. Burchell, G. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, P. 1993. The ecology of the automobile. Montreal and New York: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D., and H. Hamill. 2005. Streetwise: how taxi drivers establish their customers’ trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 2018. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Final Text Neatly Arranged. https://gdpr-info.eu/ Accessed 10/07/2019

  • Gearty, C. 2013. Liberty & security. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goold, B., I. Loader, and A. Thumala. 2010. Consuming security? Tools for a sociology of security consumption. Theoretical Criminology 14 (1): 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goold, B., I. Loader, and A. Thumala. 2013. The banality of security: the curious case of surveillance cameras. The British Journal of Criminology 53 (6): 977–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. 2006. Secessionist automobility: racism, anti-urbanism, and the politics of automobility in Atlanta, Georgia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2): 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D. 2018. Uneven mobilities, uneven opportunities: social distribution of public transport accessibility to jobs and education in Montevideo. Journal of Transport Geography 67: 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. 2001. Public service managerialism: onwards and upwards, or ‘Trobriand Cricket’ again? The Political Quarterly 72 (3): 300–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, B. and Giulianotti, R. 2012. Politics and the London 2012 Olympics: the (in)security games. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 88(4): 701–717.

  • Jain, Sarah S. Lochlann. 2004. "Dangerous instrumentality": the bystander as subject in automobility. Cultural Anthropology 19(1): 61–94.

  • Kaufmann, V. 2002. Re-thinking mobility: contemporary sociology. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, J. 2018. Governing electric vehicles: mobilizing electricity to secure automobility. Mobilities 13 (2): 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, H.A. 1958. Hawthorne revisited. Ithaca, New York: The New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leese, M., and S. Wiitendorp. 2017. Security/mobility: politics of movement. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leese, M., and S. Wittendorp. 2018. The new mobilities paradigm and critical security studies: exploring common ground. Mobilities 13 (2): 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, R. 2009. Signs of the surveillant assemblage: privacy regulation, urban CCTV, and governmentality. Social & Legal Studies 18 (4): 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli, G. 2014. Where sustainable transport and social exclusion meet: households without cars and car dependence in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 16 (3): 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, F. 2009. SUV advertising: constructing identities and practices. In Car Troubles: Critical Studies of Automobility and Auto-mobility, ed. J. Conley and A.T. McLaren, 59–76. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. 2007a. Security, liberty and the myth of balance: towards a critique of security politics. Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2): 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. 2007b. Security, commodity, fetishism. Critique 35 (3): 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. 2008. Critique of security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. 1991. Legal networks and domestic security. Studies in Law, Policy and Society 11: 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. 2004. Risk, uncertainty and government. London: Glass House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. 1949. 1984. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S.C. 2006. Automobility and the liberal disposition. The Sociological Review 54 (1): 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, E. 2017. Datenbrillen, Drohnen, Dashcams. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit Recht und Sicherheit in Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation 41 (3): 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 2000. Government and control. The British Journal of Criminology 40 (2): 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M.B. 2008. Securitisation and desecuritisation: a dramaturgical analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (4): 321–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuilenburg, M. and Peeters, R. 2015. From biopolitics to mindpolitics: Nudging in safety and security management. Open! Platform for Art, Culture & the Public Domain. 1–7.

  • Shearing, C., and J. Wood. 2003. Nodal governance, democracy, and the new 'denizens'. Journal of Law and Society 30 (3): 400–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M. 2014. The new mobilities paradigm for a live sociology. Current Sociology 62 (6): 789–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2016. Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities 1 (1): 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. 2009. Bad impressions: the will to concrete and the projectile economy of cities. In Car Troubles: Critical Studies of Automobility and Auto-Mobility, ed. J. Conley and A.T. McLaren, 77–92. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London and New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soron, D. 2009. Driven to drive: cars and the problem of ‘compulsory consumption’. In Car Troubles: Critical Studies of Automobility and Auto-Mobility, ed. J. Conley and A.T. McLaren, 181–196. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, G., and S. Hallett. 1992. The role of advertising and the car. Transport Reviews 12 (2): 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H., and C.R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, K. 2014. The car as avatar in Australian social security decisions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 27 (4): 713–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseloni, A., J. Mailley, G. Farrell, and N. Tilley. 2010. Exploring the international decline in crime rates. European Journal of Criminology 7 (5): 375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyfield, D. 2014. Putting the power in socio-technical regimes: e-mobility transition in China as political process. Mobilities 9 (4): 585–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. 2004. The system of automobility. Theory, Culture and Society 21 (4–5): 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigar, G. 2002. The Politics of Mobility: Transport, The Environment and Public Policy. London: Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Holstein, E. 2018. Digital geographies of grassroots securitisation. Social & Cultural Geography. 19 (8): 1097–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuchic, V.R. 1999. Transportation for livable cities. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. 1995. Securitisation and desecuritisation. In On Security, ed. R.D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. 2006. Border/control. European. Journal of Social Theory 9 (2): 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J.J., C. Koper, and C. Lum. 2017. The adaptation of license-plate readers for investigative purposes: police technology and innovation re-invention. Justice Quarterly 35 (4): 614–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, L. 2017. Automated Number Plate Recognition: Data Retention and the Protection of Privacy in Public Places. Journal of Information Rights, Policy and Practice. 2 (1).

  • Wyn-Jones, R. 1999. Security, strategy and critical theory. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. 2003. Too much security? International Journal of the Sociology of Law 31: 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. 2009. Security. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Data Protection Act 2018

  • Gayer, L. 2016. The need for speed: traffic regulation and the violent fabric of Karachi. Theory, Culture & Society 33 (7–8): 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2019. National Standards for Compliance and Audit of Law Enforcement ANPR. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-anpr-standards Accessed 07/02/2020.

Web sources

Official sources

Motor Car Act 1903

  • Road Traffic Act 1988

  • Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations 2002

  • Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15 Tele2/Watson, judgment 21 December 2016 (Grand Chamber) ECLI:EU:C:2016:572 and 970

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    James Greenwood-Reeves

Authors
  1. James Greenwood-Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Greenwood-Reeves.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenwood-Reeves, J. Vehicles of control: the securitisation of surveillant automobility in the United Kingdom. Secur J 35, 38–58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-020-00266-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-020-00266-y

Keywords

search

Navigation