This research helps shed light on the largely overlooked practices amongst steal-to-order offenders, with a view to identifying ways in which steal-to-order offences may be disrupted through targeted intervention. Interviews were conducted with a sample of incarcerated burglars who have previously engaged in steal-to-order offences. In addition to highlighting a number of parallels between steal-to-order and non-steal-to-order offences, this paper illustrates the nature of professionalism exhibited by offenders during steal-to-order offences. Moreover, this paper reveals a behavioural continuum amongst offenders engaging in steal-to-order offences: those who steal-to-offer, those who steal-to-order more general items, and those who steal-to-order more specialist goods. The paper also highlights the potential lack of flexibility experienced by steal-to-order offenders, and the implications of this in challenging criminological theory of offender decision making. The paper concludes by discussing how steps at both a residential and organisational level may be taken to effectively disrupt the practices of offenders during steal-to-order offences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Based on 2013/14 Crime Survey for England and Wales (Shaw et al. 2015).
The ‘Market Reduction Approach’ is a multi-disciplinary approach which seeks to reduce levels of acquisitive offending through the disruption of stolen goods markets (Sutton et al. 2001).
Offenders in the broader sample had an average age of 34 years, compared with an average age of 36 years in the current sub-sample, and held an average of 17 convictions for an estimated average of 73 burglary offences, compared with an average of 18 convictions, for an estimated average of 111 burglary offences.
At the time of an individual’s arrest, they may be asked by the police to confess to any other similar offences, on the understanding that it will not be possible to prosecute the individual separately for these offences, but that they shall instead be taken into consideration at the time of sentencing for the original offence. Though it may be the case that a court will increase a sentence as a result of these TICs, this will usually be less severe than if they had been prosecuted separately for these offences (Sentencing Council 2011).
Network sales relates to friends or contacts of an offender who they would draw on to either buy the stolen goods for their own use (or to sell on themselves), or who would pass knowledge of the item’s availability to their own contacts, until a buyer was found (Sutton 2008).
Such offences are termed ‘Hanoi’ burglaries after ‘Operation Hanoi’, a West Yorkshire Police operation which was the first UK police operation targeting this particular type of offence (The Yorkshire Post 2009).
Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) technology is used by law enforcement agencies across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland to help detect, disrupt, and deter criminal behaviour across national, regional, and local levels (www.police.uk 2018).
Altheide, D.L., and C.J. Schneider. 2013. Qualitative Media Analysis, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Armitage, R. 2006. Predicting and Preventing: Developing a Risk Assessment Mechanism for Residential Housing. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 8 (3): 137–149.
AskMID.com. 2018. Welcome to the askMID website. Motor Insurance Database, http://www.askmid.com/. Accessed July 2018.
Bennett, T., and R. Wright. 1984. Burglars on Burglary. Aldershot: Gower.
Bernasco, W. 2008. Them Again? Same-Offender Involvement in Repeat and Near Repeat Burglaries. European Journal of Criminology 5 (4): 411–431.
Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1993. Nodes, Paths and Edges: Considerations on the Complexity of Crime and the Physical Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13 (1): 3–28.
Clare, J. 2011. Examination of Systematic Variations in Burglars’ Domain-Specific Perceptual and Procedural Skills. Psychology Crime & Law 17 (3): 199–214.
Clarke, R.V. 1999. Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods. Policing and Reducing Crime Unit Police Research Series Paper 112. London: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office.
Clarke, R.V., and D.B. Cornish. 1985. Modeling Offenders’ Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy. Crime and Justice 6: 147–185.
Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–608.
Cromwell, P.F., and J.N. Olson. 2005. The Reasoning Burglar: Motives and Decision-Making Strategies. In In Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime (An Anthology), 4th ed, ed. P. Cromwell, 42–56. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Cromwell, P.F., J.N. Olson, and D.W. Avary. 1991a. Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Studies in Crime, Law and Justice Volume 8. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications.
Cromwell, P.F., J.N. Olson, D.W. Avary, and A. Marks. 1991b. How Drugs Affect Decisions by Burglars. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 35 (4): 310–321.
De Haan, W., and J. Vos. 2003. A Crying Shame: The Over-Rationalized Conception of Man in the Rational Choice Perspective. Theoretical Criminology 7 (1): 29–54.
Elffers, H. 2010. Misinformation, Misunderstanding and Misleading as Validity Threats to Offenders’ Accounts of Offending. In Offenders on Offending: Learning about crime from criminals, ed. W. Bernasco, 13–22. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Ekblom, P., and N. Tilley. 2000. Going Equipped: Criminology, Situational Crime Prevention and the Resourceful Offender. British Journal of Criminology 40 (3): 376–398.
Fox, B.H., and D.P. Farrington. 2012. Creating Burglary Profiles Using Latent Class Analysis: A New Approach to Offender Profiling. Criminal Justice and Behavior 39 (12): 1582–1611.
Levesley, T., G. Braun, M. Wilkinson, and C. Powell. 2004. Emerging Methods of Car Theft–Theft of Keys. Home Office Findings 239. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office.
Maguire, E.M.W., and T. Bennett. 1982. Burglary in a Dwelling: The Offence, the Offender and the Victim. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Markson, L., J. Woodhams, and J.W. Bond. 2010. Linking Serial Residential Burglary: Comparing the Utility of Modus Operandi Behaviours, Geographical Proximity, and Temporal Proximity. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 7 (2): 91–107.
Nee, C. 2015. Understanding Expertise in Burglars: From Pre-conscious Scanning to Action and Beyond. Aggression and Violent Behavior 20: 53–61.
Nee, C., and A. Meenaghan. 2006. Expert Decision Making in Burglars. British Journal of Criminology 46 (5): 935–949.
Nee, C., and M. Taylor. 1988. Residential Burglary in the Republic of Ireland: A Situational Perspective. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 27 (2): 105–116.
Police.uk. 2018. Automatic Number Plate Recognition. Police.uk website, https://www.police.uk/information-and-advice/automatic-number-plate-recognition/. Accessed July 2018.
Sanders, A.N., J.B. Kuhns, and K.R. Blevins. 2017. Exploring and Understanding Differences between Deliberate and Impulsive Male and Female Burglars. Crime & Delinquency 63 (12): 1547–1571.
Schneider, J. 2005. Stolen Goods Markets: Methods of Disposal. British Journal of Criminology 45 (2): 129–140.
Sentencing Council. 2011. A short guide - Sentencing for offences taken into consideration (TICs), https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/public_guide_tics_for_web.pdf, Accessed August 2018.
Shaw, O., N. Morgan, I. Mineva, J. Hoare, and R. Stevenson. 2015. Crime and the Value of Stolen Goods. Research Report 81. London: Home Office.
Shaw, S.E., L.L. Smith, and J.W. Bond. 2010. Examining the Factors that Differentiate a Car Key Burglary from a Regular Domestic Burglary. International Journal of Police Science and Management 12 (3): 450–459.
Shover, N. 1973. The Social Organization of Burglary. Social Problems 20 (4): 499–514.
Stevenson, R., and L. Forsythe. 1998. The Stolen Goods Market in New South Wales: An Interview Study with Imprisoned Burglars. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Sutton, M. 1998. Handling Stolen Goods and Theft: A Market Reduction Approach. Home Office Research Study 178. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office.
Sutton, M. 2003. How Burglars and Shoplifters Sell Stolen Goods in Derby: Describing and Understanding the Local Illicit Markets. Derby: Derby Community Safety Partnership.
Sutton, M. 2008. How Prolific Thieves Sell Stolen Goods: Describing, Understanding, and Tackling the Local Markets in Mansfield and Nottingham: A Market Reduction Approach Study. Internet Journal of Criminology, https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b93dd4_8d5e20eeba8249d6831917733362afcc.pdf. Accessed July 2018.
Sutton, M. 2010. Stolen Goods Markets. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. Problem-Specific Guides Series Guide No. 57. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Sutton, M., J. Schneider, and S. Hetherington. 2001. Tackling Theft with the Market Reduction Approach. Home Office Crime Reduction Research Series Paper No. 8. London: Home Office.
Taylor, E. 2014. Honour Among Thieves? How Morality and Rationality Influence the Decision-Making Processes of Convicted Domestic Burglars. Criminology & Criminal Justice 14 (4): 487–502.
The Yorkshire Post. 2009. Gang jailed for £600,000 car raids on homes. 28 March 2009, https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/gang-jailed-for-163-600-000-car-raids-on-homes-1-2340404, Accessed January 2019.
Theft Act. 1968. Elizabeth II. Chapter 60, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60. Accessed July 2018.
Townsley, M., D. Birks, W. Bernasco, S. Ruiter, S.D. Johnson, G. White, and S. Baum. 2015. Burglar Target Selection: A Cross-national Comparison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 52 (1): 3–31.
Vandeviver, C., T. Neutens, S. van Daele, D. Geurts, and T. Vander Beken. 2015. A Discrete Spatial Choice Model of Burglary Target Selection at the House-Level. Applied Geography 64: 24–34.
Vaughn, M.G., M. Delisi, K.M. Beaver, and M.O. Howard. 2008. Toward a Quantitative Typology of Burglars: A Latent Profile Analysis of Career Offenders. Journal of Forensic Science 53 (6): 1387–1392.
Wright, R., and S. Decker. 1994. Burglars on the Job. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Wright, R., R.H. Logie, and S.H. Decker. 1995. Criminal Expertise and Offender Decision Making: An Experimental Study of the Target Selection Process in Residential Burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 32 (1): 39–53.
This research was supported through an ‘Innovations in Quantitative Methods’ Scholarship from the University of Leeds. The authors are grateful to Professor David Best, Dr James Banks, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Thanks are also extended to HM Prison Service for enabling access to the offenders in this study, and, in particular, to the staff and prisoners who gave their valuable time in order to support this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Addis, N., Evans, A. & Malleson, N. Exploring the practices of steal-to-order burglars: a different brand of offender?. Secur J 32, 457–475 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-019-00174-w
- Stolen goods
- Crime prevention
- Modus operandi