Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 20–44 | Cite as

An assessment of factors affecting airport security services: an AHP approach and case in Turkey

  • Nalan Ergün
  • K. Gülnaz BülbülEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Conducting air transportation in the fastest and the most comfortable manner depends fundamentally on ensuring safe and secure flights. Therefore, due to its increasing significance, the subject of airport security services has been the focus of various studies. The purpose of this study is to determine the relative importance of the factors that play a key role in airport security services. Determining the relative importance of these factors may help use the resources more effectively and efficiently, and thus enable airport checkpoint security services to be delivered at the optimal level. This study employs a multi-criteria decision-making technique known as the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The major factors named as Human Resources, Facilities and Equipment, Stakeholders, Regulation and Supervision and Costs, and the sub-factors under these major factors were determined on the basis of the consultations held with the field experts and review of the relevant literature. Within the scope of the study, airport security staff including both practitioners and managers at various levels of work positions were selected as the participants. The AHP method was applied to the obtained data, and the human resources factor was found to be more important than the other factors, which is supported by other research findings in the aviation literature.

Keywords

Aviation security Airport security Airport checkpoint Security services AHP 

References

  1. Bülbül, K. G., & Ergün N. (2016). An assessment of the effective factors in airport security procedures by AHP model. In The 4th international conference on tourism, transport and logistics, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Eldar, Z. 2010. The human factor in aviation security. Airport Management 5 (1): 34–38.Google Scholar
  3. Elias, B. (2011). Changes in airport passenger screening technologies and procedures: Frequently asked questions. CRS Report for Congress R41502, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  4. Gillian, D., and W.G. Morrison. 2015. Aviation security: Costing, pricing, finance and performance. Journal of Air Transport Management 48: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harris, H.D. 2002. How to really improve airport security. Ergonomics and Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Application 10 (1): 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harrison, J. 2009. International aviation and terrorism: Evolving threat, evolving security. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). 2011. Annex 17: Security, 9th ed. Montreal, QC: ICAO.Google Scholar
  8. Karimbocus, M. (2009). Competency requirements for aviation security. In 43rd Annual international Carnahan conference on security technology (pp. 1–4). Zurich: IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ccst.2009.5335574.
  9. Kirschenbaum, A., M. Mariani, C.V. Gulijk, S. Lubasz, C. Rapaport, and H. Andriessen. 2012. Airport security: An ethnographic study. Journal of Air Transport Management. 18 (1): 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirschenbaum, A. 2013. The cost of airport security: The passenger dilemma. Journal of Air Transport Management 30: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kraemer, S., P. Carayon, and T.F. Sanquist. 2009. Human and organizational factor in security screening and inspection systems: Conceptual framework and key research needs. Cognition, Technology & Work 11 (1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Price, J.C., and J.S. Forrest. 2013. Practical aviation security: Predicting and preventing future threats. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinmann.Google Scholar
  13. Saaty, R.W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9 (3): 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saaty, T.L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48: 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shanks, N.E.L., and A.L.W. Bradley. 2004. Handbook of checked baggage screening. Wiltshire: Professional Engineering Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  16. Sindhav, B., J. Holland, R.A. Rodie, P.T. Adidam, and L.G. Pol. 2006. The impact of perceived fairness on satisfaction: Are airport security measures fair? Does it matter? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 14 (4): 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2015). Milli Sivil Havacılık Güvenlik Programı. Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, A.R. 2008. Aviation Security Management. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Turney, M. A., J. C. Bishop, and P. C. Fitzgerald. 2004. Measuring the importance of recent airport security interventions. Journal of Air Transportation 9 (3): 56–66.Google Scholar
  20. Wittmer, A., B. Thomas, and M. Roland. 2011. Aviation systems: Management of the integrated aviation value chain. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yoo, K.E., and Y.C. Choi. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 12: 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aviation Management, Faculty of Aeronautics and AstronauticsEskisehir Technical UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations