Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 841–858 | Cite as

‘the whole window just shatters into a million pieces and it doesn’t make any sound’: an examination of ‘affordance’ and situational cues for theft from a motor vehicle

  • Anthony QuinnEmail author
  • Louise Grove
Original Article

Abstract

Much offending, particularly acts of acquisitive crime, is influenced by whether there is a discernible opportunity to take advantage of. The success of this can be determined by the presence or absence of certain characteristics in the immediate environment and how they are interpreted to facilitate gain by an offender. This study explores some of these techniques or ‘affordances’ that have been adopted by individuals when seeking to commit Theft from a motor vehicle offences. This insight is gleaned through qualitative one-to-one interviews with participants who have received criminal convictions for this crime type. There is an evaluation of how offender awareness of affordances could lead to the vulnerability of certain contexts as subsequently, ideas of countermeasures against these offending opportunities are offered.

Keywords

Theft from a motor vehicle Offender perspectives Situational cues Affordance Environmental criminology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Leicestershire Police and the Derbyshire Leicestershire Nottinghamshire and Rutland Community Rehabilitation Company for their collaboration with Loughborough University and for helping to facilitate this study.

References

  1. Andresen, M.A., P.J. Brantingham, and J.B. Kinney. 2010. Classics in Environmental Criminology. British Columbia: Simon Fraser University Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, R. 2017. Design, Crime and the Built Environment. In Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Chapter 11, 2nd ed, ed. N. Tilley, and A. Sidebottom. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, R. 2018. Burglars’ Take on Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED): Reconsidering the Relevance from an Offender Perspective. Security Journal 31: 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, J., I. Brown, B. Senior, and K. Pease. 1998. Repeat Victimisation: Offender Accounts. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention 3 (4): 269–279.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, T., and R. Wright. 1984. Burglars on Burglary. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 1978. A Theoretical Model of Crime Site Selection. In Crime, Law and Sanctions, ed. M. Krohn, and R. Akers. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 1981. Environmental Criminology. Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  8. British Society of Criminology. 2006. Code of Ethics. http://www.britsoccrim.org/docs/CodeofEthics.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2017.
  9. Bromley, R., and C. Thomas. 1997. Vehicle Crime in the City Centre: Planning for Secure Parking. The Town Planning Review 68 (2): 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R.V., and P.M. Harris. 1992. Auto Theft and Its Prevention. In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 16, ed. M. Tonry, 1–54. Chicago: Chicago University Press, Chicago University.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Copes, H. 1999. Routine Activities and Motor Vehicle Theft: A Crime Specific Approach. Journal of Crime & Justice 22 (2): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DLNR CRC. 2014. Derbyshire Leicestershire Nottinghamshire & Rutland Community Rehabilitation Company: Transforming Lives, Reducing Crime. https://dlnrcrc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/DLNR-LF-018_The-DLNR-CRC-Ltd-About-Us.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
  15. Earle, J., and Edmunds, A. 2004. Operation Cobra. http://www.popcenter.org/library/awards/tilley/2004/04-71(R).pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
  16. Ekblom, P. 2012. Conceptual and Methodological Explorations in Affordance and Counter Terrorism. In Terrorism and Affordance, Chapter 3, ed. M. Taylor, and P.M. Currie. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Farrell, G., and K. Pease. 1993. Once Bitten, Twice Bitten: Repeat Victimisation and its Implications for Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Unit Paper 46. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  18. Felson, M. 1994. Crime and Everyday Life: Insights and Implications for Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  19. Felson, M. 2014. Linking Criminal Choices, Routine Activities, Informal Control, and Criminal Outcomes. In The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Chapter 8, ed. D.B. Cornish, and R.V. Clarke. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Garwood, Jeanette. 2011. A Quasi-Experimental Investigation of Self-Reported Offending and Perception of Criminal Opportunity in Undergraduate Students. Security Journal 24 (1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson, E.J. 1988. Exploratory Behaviour in the Development of Perceiving Acting, and the Acquiring of Knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology 39: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibson, J.J. 2015. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Classic ed. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gov.uk. 2017. Home Office Counting Rules for Recorded Crime: Vehicle Offences. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/602805/count-vehicle-apr-2017.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2017.
  24. Grove, L. 2011. Preventing Repeat Domestic Burglary: A Meta-Evaluation of Studies from Australia, the UK, and the United States. Victims and Offenders 6: 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grove, L.E., and G. Farrell. 2012. Once Bitten, Twice Shy: Repeat Victimization and Its Prevention. In The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention, Chapter 20, ed. B.C. Welsh, and D.P. Farrington. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Grove, L.E., G. Farrell, D.P. Farrington, and S.D. Johnson. 2012. Preventing Repeat Victimization: A Systematic Review. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.Google Scholar
  27. Hirschi, T. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jaques, S., and E. Bonomo. 2017. Learning from the Offender’s Perspective on Crime Prevention. In Crime Prevention in the 21st Century, Chapter 2, ed. B. Leclerc, and E.U. Savona. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. 2010. A Brief History of the Analysis of Crime Concentration. European Journal of Applied Mathematics 21 (4–5): 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, S.D., L. Summers, and K. Pease. 2006. Vehicle Crime: Communicating Spatial and Temporal Patterns. London: UCL Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, S.D., L. Summers, and K. Pease. 2009. Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lab, S.P. 2016. Crime Prevention: Approaches, Practices, and Evaluations, 9th ed. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Lasky, N.V., B.S. Fisher, and S. Jacques. 2017. ‘Thinking thief’ in the Crime Prevention Arms Race: Lessons Learned from Shoplifters. Security Journal 30 (3): 772–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, Y., J.E. Eck, O. SooHyun, and N.N. Martinez. 2017. How Concentrated is Crime at Places? A Systematic Review from 1970 to 2015. Crime Science 6 (1): 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leicestershire Police. 2018. Current Local Priorities: To Reduce the Incidents of Vehicle Crime. https://leics.police.uk/local-policing/city-centre. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
  36. Light, R., C. Nee, and H. Ingham. 1993. Car Theft: The Offender’s Perspective. Home Office Research Study No.130. London HMSO.Google Scholar
  37. Lockwood, Brian. 2012. The Presence and Nature of a Near-Repeat Pattern of Motor Vehicle Theft. Security Journal 25 (1): 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loughborough University. nd. Ethics Approvals (Human Participants) Sub-Committee. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/wwwlboroacuk/content/universitycommittees/ethicsapprovalshumanparticipantssub-committee/Data%20Collection%20and%20Storage.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
  39. Nee, C. 2003. Research on Burglary at the End of the Millennium: A Grounded Approach to Understanding Crime. Security Journal 16 (3): 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nee, C. 2010. Research on Residential Burglary: Ways of Improving Validity and Participants’ Recall When Gathering Data. In Offenders on Offending: Learning About Crime from Criminals, ed. W. Bernasco. Devon: Willan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nee, C., and A. Meenaghan. 2006. Expert Decision Making in Burglars. British Journal of Criminology 46 (5): 935–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nee, C., and M. Taylor. 2000. Examining Burglars’ Target Selection: Interview, Experiment or Ethnomethodology? Psychology, Crime & Law 6 (1): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nee, C., M. White, K. Woolford, T. Pascu, L. Barker, and L. Wainwright. 2015. New Methods for Examining Expertise in Burglars in Natural and Simulated Environments: Preliminary Findings. Psychology, Crime & Law 21 (5): 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newman, G., R.V. Clarke, and S.G. Shoham. 2016. Rational Choice and Situational Crime Prevention. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Norman, D.A. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Office for National Statistics. 2017. Overview of Vehicle-Related Theft: England and Wales. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/overviewofvehiclerelatedtheft/2017-07-20. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  47. Palmer, E.J., A. Holmes, and C.R. Hollin. 2002. Investigating Burglars’ Decisions: Factors Influencing Target Choice, Method of Entry, Reasons for Offending, Repeat Victimisation of a Property and Victim Awareness. Security Journal 15 (1): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pease, K. 1998. Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock. Crime Prevention and Detection Series Paper 90. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  49. Pease, K., and G. Laycock. 1999. Revictimisation: Reducing the Heat on Hot Victims. Australian Institute of Criminology 128: 1–6.Google Scholar
  50. Polišenská, V.A. 2011. Interviewing Offenders in a Penitentiary Environment and the Use of Mental Maps During Interviews. In Offenders on Offending: Learning About Crime from Criminals, Chapter 15, ed. W. Bernasco. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Sampson, R. 2004. Theft of and from Autos in Parking Facilities in Chula Vista, California: A Final Report to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services on the Field Applications of the Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Project. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  52. Saunders, M.N.K. 2006. Gatekeeper. In The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods, ed. V. Jupp. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Sherman, L.W., P.R. Gartin, and M.E. Buerger. 1989. Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place. Criminology 27 (1): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spelman, W., and J.E. Eck. 1989. Sitting Ducks, Ravenous Wolves and Helping Hands: New Approaches to Urban Policing. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  55. Suresh, G., and R. Tewksbury. 2012. Locations of Motor Vehicle Theft and Recovery. American Journal of Criminal Justice 3 (8): 200–215.Google Scholar
  56. Telegraph & Argus. 2014. Video: Brazen Thieves in High-vis Jackets Steal Benches from Heritage Station. http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/NEWS/11134840.VIDEO__Brazen_thieves_in_high_vis_jackets_steal_benches_from_heritage_station/. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
  57. Temple University. 2015. Near Repeat Calculator. http://www.cla.temple.edu/cj/center-for-security-and-crime-science/projects/nearrepeatcalculator/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  58. The AA. 2012. Reducing Risks: Top Tips for Reducing Car Crime. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/security/reducing_risk.html. Accessed 29 Jan 2018.
  59. The DLNR CRC. 2014. Transforming Lives, Reducing Crime. https://dlnrcrc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/DLNR-LF-018_The-DLNR-CRC-Ltd-About-Us.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  60. Tilley, N. 1993. After Kirkholt: Theory, Method and Results of Replication Evaluations. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
  61. Van Gelder, J.L., C. Nee, M. Otte, A. Demetriou, I. van Sintemaartensdijk, and J.W. van Prooijen. 2017. Virtual Burglary: Exploring the Potential of Virtual Reality to Study Burglary in Action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 54 (1): 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wickström, P.O. 2006. Individuals, Settings, and Acts of Crime: Situational Mechanisms and the Explanation of Crime. In The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development, Chapter 3, ed. P.O. Wickström, and R. Sampson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson, J.Q., and G.L. Kelling. 1982. Broken Windows. Atlantic Monthly 249 (3): 29–38.Google Scholar
  64. Wortley, R. 1997. Reconsidering the Role of Opportunity in Situational Crime Prevention. In Rational Choice and Situational Crime Prevention, ed. G. Newman, R.V. Clarke, and S.G. Shohan, 65–81. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Wortley, R. 2008. Situational Precipitators of Crime. In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, Chapter 3, ed. R. Wortley, and L. Mazerolle. Willan: Cullompton.Google Scholar
  66. Wortley, R. 2012. Affordance and Situational Crime Prevention: Implications for Counter Terrorism. In Terrorism and Affordance, Chapter 2, ed. M. Taylor, and P.M. Currie. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  67. Wortley, R. 2017. Situational Precipitators of Crime. In Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, Chapter 3, ed. R. Wortley, and M. Townsley. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Zetinigg, B., and M. Gaderer. 2011. Validating Offenders’ Accounts: Learning from Offender Interviews with Bank Robbers in Austrian Prisons. In Offenders on Offending: Learning About Crime from Criminals, Chapter 16, ed. W. Bernasco. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations