Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 208–225 | Cite as

You can trust me: a multimethod analysis of the Nigerian email scam

  • Timothy RichEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

How do scammers invoke trust within the Nigerian email scam and how do recipients interpret such trust-laden offers? Rather than view the email content as static, this article suggests that the emails strategically appeal to trust as a means to enhance susceptibility. Content analysis of over a half-million scam emails reveals that references to trust language are most common in larger award claims and those claiming to be from Africa. However, experimental evidence suggests that trust language within scam letters has minimal influence on respondents’ perceptions of the letter. This analysis expands our understanding of the psychology behind the scam letter format and suggests means to further combat email fraud.

Keywords

Nigerian email scam Trust Content analysis Experimental design Perceptions 

References

  1. Atkins, B., and W. Huang. 2013. A study of social engineering in online frauds. Open Journal of Social Sciences 1 (3): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barron, A. 2006. Understanding spam: A macro-textual analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (6): 880–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berelson, B. 1952. Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berinsky, A.J., G.A. Huber, and G.S. Lenz. 2012. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis 20: 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blommaert, J., and T. Omoniyi. 2006. Email fraud: Language, technology, and the indexicals of globalization. Social Semiotics 16 (4): 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S.D. Gosling. 2011. Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Button, M., C. Lewis, and J. Tapley. 2014. Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal 27: 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caplan, T. 2013, February 13. Phone interview.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, J. 2010. Suckers victims lost $9.3 billion to 419 scammers in 2009. Arstechnica. http://arstechnica.com/security/2010/01/victims-lost-93-billion-to-419-scammers-in-2009/. Accessed 29 Jan 2010.
  10. Costin, A., J. Isacenkova, M. Balduzzi, A. Francillon, and D. Balzarotti. 2013. The role of phone numbers in understanding cyber-crime schemes. Paper presented at the 2013 Eleventh Annual International Conference on Privacy Security and Trust, pp. 213–220.Google Scholar
  11. Cukier, W.L., E.J. Nesselroth, and S. Cody. 2007. Genre, narrative and the ‘Nigerian letter’ in electronic mail. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2007/2755/00/27550070a.pdf.
  12. Datar, T.D., K.A. Cole, and M.K. Rogers. 2014. Awareness of scam e-mails: An exploratory research study. ADFSL Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law. http://proceedings.adfsl.org/index.php/CDFSL/article/view/26/26.
  13. Downs, J.S., M.B. Holbrook, and L.F. Cranor. 2006. Decision strategies and susceptibility to phishing. Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, M., W.V. McIntosh, J. Lin, and C.L. Cates. 2007. Recounting the courts? Applying content analysis to enhance empirical legal research. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (4): 1007–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao, Y., and G. Zhao. 2005. Knowledge-based information extraction: A case study of recognizing emails of Nigerian frauds. In Natural language processing and information systems, ed. A. Montoyo, R. Munoz, and E. Metais, 161–172. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glickman, H. 2005. The Nigerian ‘419’ advance fee scams: Prank or peril? Canadian Journal of African Studies 39 (3): 460–489.Google Scholar
  17. Gregory, D.W., and B. Nikiforova. 2012. A sweetheart of a deal: How people get hooked and reeled in by financial scams. Journal of Behavioral Finance & Economics 2 (2): 96–122.Google Scholar
  18. Grinker, R.R., S.C. Lubkemann, and C.B. Steiner. 2010. Perspectives on Africa: A reader in culture, history and representation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Haines, L. 2004. Nigerian judge claims ‘no jurisdiction to hear it. The A Register. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/20/419_trail_collapse/. Accessed 20 July 2004.
  20. Hamburger, Y.A., and E. Ben-Artzi. 2000. The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 16 (4): 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamburger, Y.A., and E. Ben-Artzi. 2003. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (1): 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herley, C. 2012. Why do Nigerian scammers say they are from Nigeria? Unpublished paper. http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/167719/whyfromnigeria.pdf.
  23. Horton, J.J., D. Rand, and R.J. Zeckhauser. 2011. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 14 (3): 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huber, G.A., S.J. Hill, and G.S. Lenz. 2012. Sources of bias in retrospective decision making: Experimental evidence on voters’ limitations in controlling incumbents. American Political Science Review 106 (4): 720–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huff, C., and D. Tingley. 2015. “Who are these people” evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics July–September: 1–12.Google Scholar
  26. Isacenkova, J., D. Thonnard, A. Coston, A. Francillon, and D. Balzarotti. 2014. Inside the scam jungle: A closer look at 419 scam email operations. EURASIP Journal on Information Security 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
  27. King, A., and J. Thomas. 2009. You can’t cheat an honest man: Making ($$$s and) sense of the Nigerian e-mail scams. In Crimes of the Internet, eds. F. Schmallegar, and M. Pittaro, 206–224. Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  28. Konig, T., and B. Luig. 2009. German ‘LexIconSpace’: Policy positions and their legislative context. German Politics 18 (3): 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krebs, B. 2011. Where did that scammer get your email address? Krebs on Security blog. http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/04/where-did-that-scammer-get-your-email-address/. Accessed 25 Apr 2011.
  30. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Kuziemko, I., M.I. Norton, E. Saez, and S. Stantcheva. 2015. How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Economic Review 105 (4): 1478–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazarus, D. 2003. Greed fuels big internet scam. San Francisco Chronicle 12 January.Google Scholar
  33. Legard, D. 2003. E-mail threats increase sharply. PC World. http://www.pcworld.com/article/107930/article.html.
  34. Levy, E. 2003. Crossover: Online pests plaguing the offline world. IEEE Security and Privacy 1 (6): 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Longe, O., and A. Osofisan. 2011. On the origins of advance free fraud electronic emails: A technical investigation using Internet protocol address tracers. African Journal of Information Systems 3 (1): 17–26.Google Scholar
  36. Longe, O.B., V. Mbarika, M. Kourouma, F. Wada, and R. Isabalija. 2009. Seeing beyond the surface: Understanding and tracking fraudulent cyber activities. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 6 (3): 124–135.Google Scholar
  37. Mbaziira, A.V., E. Abozindah, and J.H. Jones Jr. 2015. Evaluating classifiers in detecting 419 scams in bilingual cybercriminal communities. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 13 (7): 1–7.Google Scholar
  38. Milne, G.R., L.I. Labrecque, and C. Cromer. 2009. Toward an understanding of the online consumer risky behavior and protection practices. Journal of Consumer Affairs 43 (3): 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitnick, K., and W. Simon. 2002. The art of deception: Controlling the human element of security. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Muscat, G., M. James, and A. Graycar. 2002. Older people and consumer fraud. Number 220 Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  41. Neuendorf, K.A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Nhan, J., P. Kinkade, and R. Burns. 2009. Finding a pot of gold at the end of an internet rainbow: Further examination of fraudulent email solicitation. International journal of Cyber Criminology 3 (1): 452–475.Google Scholar
  43. Onyebadi, U., and J. Park. 2012. ‘I’m Sister Maria, please help me’: A lexical study of 4-1-9 international advance fee fraud email communications. International Communication Gazette 74 (2): 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paolacci, G., J. Chandler, and P.G. Ipeirotis. 2010. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5 (5): 411–419.Google Scholar
  45. Park, Y., J. Jones, D. McCoy, E. Shi, and M. Jakobsson. 2014. Scambaiter: Understanding targeted Nigerian scams on Craigslist. Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. Internet Society. https://cs.gmu.edu/~mccoy/papers/scambaiter.pdf.
  46. Rich, T.S. 2014. Propaganda with purpose: Uncovering patterns in North Korean nuclear coverage, 1997–2012. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 14 (3): 427–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross, D.G. 2009. Ars dictaminis perverted: The personal solicitation of email as a genre. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 39 (1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schiesel, S. 2004. Turning the tables on e-mail swindlers. New York Times 17 June: Gl, G7.Google Scholar
  49. Shank, D.B. 2016. Using crowdsourcing websites for sociological research: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. The American Sociologist 47 (1): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tade, O., and I. Aliyu. 2011. Social organization and Internet fraud among university undergraduates in Nigeria. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 5 (2): 860–875.Google Scholar
  51. Thompson, S. 2006. Helping the hacker? Library information, security, and social engineering. Information Technology and Libraries 25: 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Titus, R.M., F. Heinzelman, and J.M. Boyle. 1995. Victimisation of persons by fraud. Crime and Delinquency 41: 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. US Department of State. 1997. Nigerian Advance fee fraud.Google Scholar
  54. Viosca, C., B.J. Bergiel, and P. Balsmeier. 2004. Effects of the electronic money fraud on the brand equity of Nigeria and Africa. Management Research News 27 (6): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wizard, B. 2000. Nigeria 419 scam: Game over. Wallowa: Starguill International.Google Scholar
  56. Zuckoff, M. 2005. Annals of crime: The perfect mark. The New Yorker 82 (13): 36–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations