Skip to main content

Getting into character: On psychoanalysis and literature in the classroom

Abstract

This article reflects on literary criticism’s longstanding disciplinary aversion to psychoanalytic character study, using personal experience to rethink the value of this method in the undergraduate classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. I have in mind here the early work of Harold Bloom and Frederick Crews as representative examples of the psycho-biographical and content-focused psychoanalytic literary scholarship from 1970s and Shoshana Felman, Peter Brooks, Barbara Johnson, Leo Bersani, and Jane Gallop as some of the more well-known Lacanian (and often Derridian) affiliates from the 1980s. For further accounts of the relationship between literary theory and psychoanalysis, see Terry Eagleton’s canonical Literary Theory: An Introduction and Maud Ellman’s edited collection Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Laubender.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laubender, C. Getting into character: On psychoanalysis and literature in the classroom. Psychoanal Cult Soc 27, 386–390 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-022-00300-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-022-00300-5

Keywords

  • psychoanalysis
  • literature
  • literary criticism
  • teaching
  • character