Activity, speech, and change: Progressive politics and regressive fantasies
This essay examines convictions about the importance of speech and activity with reference to an ideal of change, where change may be understood in at least two ways: first, as a process by which persons or things become new or different in reality, and, second, as a grandiose fantasy in which change represents an end in itself and is aligned with ideals such as eternality, centrality, and significance. The essay compares analytic and political situations without suggesting that analytic and political arenas are identical, or that individuals or groups involved in either sort of activity ought to behave identically. Rather, it maintains that much of the dedication to speech and activity relies on a fantasy of change that may be orthogonal, if not antithetical, to a goal shared by psychoanalysis and progressive politics: the facilitation of the capacity to be, to act, and to generate meaningful change for the self and others.
Keywordschange responsibility neutrality omnipotent fantasy group identification subjectivity
- Baldwin, J. and Mead, M. (1971) A Rap on Race. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott. Selections reprinted in M. Popova (2015) A rap on race: Margaret Mead and James Baldwin’s rare conversation on forgiveness and the difference between guilt and responsibility. https://www.brainpickings.org/2015/03/19/a-rap-on-race-margaret-mead-and-james-baldwin/, accessed 1 June 2017.
- Bracher, M. (2006) Radical Pedagogy Identity, Generativity, and Social Transformation. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Caruth, C. (1995) Introduction. In: C. Caruth (ed.) Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1952) Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Tavistock and Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kohut, H. (1977) The Restoration of the Self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Levine, D. (2004) Attack on Government: Fear, Distrust, and Hatred in Public Life. Charlottesville, VA: Pitchstone.Google Scholar
- Levine, D., and Bowker, M.H. (forthcoming) The Destroyed World and the Guilty Self: A Psychoanalytic Study of Culture and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, S.A. (1997) Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
- Racker, H. (1968) Transference and Countertransference. Madison, CO: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
- Reilly, K. (2016) Read Elie Wiesel’s Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech. Time. 2 July. http://time.com/4392267/elie-wiesel-dead-nobel-peace-prize-speech/, accessed 5 July 2018.
- Sartre, J.-P. (1956) Being and Nothingness. Translated by H.E. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
- Schafer, R. (1983) The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Simonsen, K. (2002) The body as battlefield. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1(25): 7–9.Google Scholar
- Tea, K. (2017) To my friends who are sick of politics. Motherwise. https://motherwiselife.org/to-my-friends-who-are-sick-of-politics/, accessed 5 July 2018.
- Winnicott, D.W. (1986) Home is Where We Start From: Essays by a Psychoanalyst. Edited by C. Winnicott, R. Shepard and M. Davis. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar