Skip to main content
Log in

Transphobia in the bathroom: Sexual difference, alterity and jouissance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rights of transgender people to use the bathroom of their choice is a matter of much debate, as reflected in multiple legal cases currently being bounced back and forth between the Supreme and lower courts in the U.S. Why does the figure of the trans person elicit anxiety, hatred, and aggression? The author investigates the reasons behind transphobia, or xenophobia against transgendered individuals, by using a Lacanian psychoanalytic approach. Jacques Lacan’s logic of the social bond, mirror stage, conceptions of jouissance, and sexuation formulae are taken up to shed light on transphobia in general and in particular how and why it is elicited at the site of the public bathroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Transgender studies seeks to denaturalize and make visible and articulatable gendered norms, including the social roles that go along with gender identity and the link between the sexed body and the gendered body. Although “transgender,” “transsexual,” or “genderqueer” may be the preferred term of a particular trans person to name gender identity, for the purposes of this article I will use the term “transgender” or “trans.” Even though someone can identify as transgender regardless of whether or not s/he has undergone a social or physical transition, since this article is concerned with the xenophobia elicited through observing someone as being trans, when the term “transgender” is used it will refer to someone who has socially or physically transitioned.

  2. The assumption of a sexual position is defined in reference to the phallus. In Seminar XX, Lacan (1975/1998a) said that a woman is a subject who is “not-all” in the phallic order; she is mostly defined by phallic jouissance but also has access to Other jouissance. By contrast, a man is someone who is entirely defined by phallic jouissance. In Lacan’s early work, a man is defined by having the phallus, or, more precisely, a man is “not without having it” (1994, p. 153), while a woman is defined by being the phallus. Although the phallus certainly functions as a sexual signifier, there is no signifier for what makes a woman a woman.

  3. Lacan (1957/2006e) said that his figure of the bathroom doors (p. 416) not merely “silence[s] the nominalist debate with a low blow, but [also]… show[s] how the signifier in fact enters the signified – namely, in a form which, since it is not immaterial, raises the question of its place in reality” (p. 417). Lacan is referring to the nominalist debate about whether or not abstract ideas stand for entities that objectively exist, and seems to be arguing that this abstract idea of being a gentleman or a lady does not exist somehow in the doors as entities but instead in the juxtaposition of the doors. Lacan comments also that the signifier – of “Gentlemen” or of “Ladies” – is “not immaterial” (p. 417) and has a kind of substance, one which is more substantial than that of the signified.

  4. I am referring here, on the one hand, to the aforementioned chapter, “The Sense of Symptoms,” in Freud’s Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis (1917/1963), in which Freud highlights that psychological symptoms at first do not seem to make sense. For instance, what is the sense in a young woman feeling compelled each night to remove all the clocks and watches from her room and to move all of the flower pots and vases to her writing table? But in the seeming nonsense of the symptom there is a sense -- an unconscious sense. On the other hand, Lacan similarly makes great use of the word “nonsense,” but he highlights the aspect of the signifier that  is outside of meaning, but which can nevertheless have a great effect on the subject.

  5. "There is no Other of the Other" is a much commented on idea of Lacan that dates from 1959. For the purposes of understanding this article, the phrase can be said to mean there is no vantage point outside of the system of language from which a signifier has a fixed meaning. The Other itself is lacking, and so it cannot provide a firm foundation for its own identity.

  6. In a tweet on 2 January 2018, Trump said, “North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the ‘Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.’ Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!”

References

  • Adorno, T. (2006) Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Translated by E. Jephcott. New York: Verso Press.

  • Browne, K. (2004) Genderism and the bathroom problem: (Re)materializing sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies. Gender, Place and Culture 11(3): 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, S. (2011) Queering Bathrooms: Gender, Sexuality, and the Hygienic Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1917/1963) Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis (Part III). Standard Edition 16. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 243–396.

  • Freud, S. (1921/1955) Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Standard Edition 18. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 65–144.

  • Freud, S. (1930/1961) Civilization and its Discontents. Standard Edition 21. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 59–148.

  • George, S. (2016) Trauma and Race: A Lacanian Study of African American Racial Identity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherovici, P. (2010) Please Select Y\our Gender: From the Invention of Hysteria to the Democratizing of Transgenderism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherovici, P. (2017) Transgender Psychoanalysis: A Lacanian Perspective on Sexual Difference. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. (2013) Gendered restrooms and minority stress: The public regulation of gender and its impact on transgender people’s lives. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Herman-Gendered-Restrooms-and-Minority-Stress-June-2013.pdf, accessed 8 June 2018.

  • Kaufman, S. (2014) Noam Chomsky: Zombies are the new Indians and slaves in white America’s collective nightmare, 14 February. https://www.rawstory.com/2014/02/noam-chomsky-zombies-are-the-new-indians-and-slaves-in-white-americas-collective-nightmare/, accessed 8 July 2018.

  • Lacan, J. (1945/2006a) Logical time and the assertion of anticipated certainty. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1948/2006b) Aggressiveness in psychoanalysis. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1949/2006c) The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1957/2006d) The instance of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1966/2006e) Position of the unconscious. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1973/1998a) In: J.-A. Miller (ed.) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1974/1990) Television. Translated by D. Hollier, R. Krauss, and A. Michelson. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1975/1998b) In: J.-A. Miller (ed.) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX: Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge, 1972-1973. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1986/1997) In: J.-A. Miller (ed.) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-1960. Translated by D. Porter. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Lacan, J. (1994) Le Séminaire Livre IV: La Relation d’Objet. Paris, France: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2011) Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, Livre XIX: Ou Pire. Paris, France: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, E. (2014) Racism 2.0. Lacan Quotidien 371: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, T. (2013) Enjoying What We Don’t Have: The Political Project of Psychoanalysis. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, T. (2017) Universality in a particular age. Presentation at LACK conference, October, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

  • Miller, J-A. (1994) Extimité. In: M. Bracher, M. Alcorn, R. Corthell, and F. Massardier-Kenney (eds.) Lacanian Theory of Discourse. New York: New York University Press, pp. 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Transgender Equality (2015) The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf, accessed 8 June 2018.

  • Office for Victims of Crime (2014) Responding to transgender victims of sexual assault: the numbers, June. https://www.ovc.gov/pubs/forge/sexual_numbers.html, accessed 8 June 2018.

  • Rose, G. (1999) Performing space. In: D. Massey, J. Allen and P. Sarre (eds.) Human Geography Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L. and Eilperin, J. (2017) CDC gets list of forbidden words: Fetus, transgender, diversity. Washington Post, 15 December. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8edec16379010_story.html?tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.361a7dde45e5, accessed 8 June 2018.

  • Tannehill, B. (2015) Debunking bathroom myths. Huffington Post, 28 November. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brynn-tannehill/debunking-bathroom-myths_b_8670438.html, accessed 8 June 2018.

  • Žižek, S. (2017) Moebius strip, cross cap, Klein bottle: The twisted space of subjectivity. Presentation at LACK conference, October, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

  • Zupančič, A. and Terada, R. (2015) Sex, ontology, subjectivity: In conversation with Alenka Zupančič. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 20(2): 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Swales.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swales, S. Transphobia in the bathroom: Sexual difference, alterity and jouissance. Psychoanal Cult Soc 23, 290–309 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-018-0099-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-018-0099-7

Keywords

Navigation