Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 426–433 | Cite as

Disadapting to the environmental crisis

Field Note

Abstract

This paper offers a psychoanalytically informed reflection on how the environmental crisis has been framed and debated. The author draws attention to the ways in which apparently radical responses to the environmental crisis may often only reinforce established sociopolitical positions. By examining various responses to the environmental situation, it is argued that solutions-focused thinking runs counter both to the underlying assumptions of much environmentalist literature, and to basic psychoanalytic insights concerning the nature of change. Emphasis on action and the theme of adaptation is portrayed as being fundamentally opposed to a more substantive shift in consciousness.

Keywords

adaptation crisis ecology environmentalism psychoanalysis 

References

  1. Beeson, M. (2010) The coming of environmental authoritarianism. Environmental Politics 19(2): 276–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bion, W.R. (1961, 2014) Experience in Groups and Other Papers. The Complete Works of W.R. Bion, Vol. VI. London: Karnac Books, pp. 95–257.Google Scholar
  3. Bookchin, M. (1982) The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. London: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R.S. (2014) Affirming the contradiction: Jungian aesthetics, reification, and the shadow. Jung Journal: Culture & Psyche 8(3): 66–74.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R.S. (2015) An opening: Trauma and transcendence. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches 7(1): 72–80.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R.S. (2017) Psychoanalysis Beyond the End of Metaphysics: Thinking Towards the Post-Relational. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1930, 1961) Civilization and Its Discontents. Standard Edition, 21. London: The Hogarth Press, pp. 64–148.Google Scholar
  8. Hillman, J. and Ventura, M. (1992) We’ve Had a Hundred Years of Psychotherapy—And the World’s Getting Worse. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  9. Lertzman, R.A. (2013) The myth of apathy: Psychoanalytic explorations of environmental subjectivity. In: S. Weintrobe (ed.) Engaging with Climate Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 117–133.Google Scholar
  10. Merchant, C. (1980) The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Morton, T. (2007) Ecology Without Nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Odajnyk, V.W. (1976) Jung and Politics: The Political and Social Ideas of C.G. Jung. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pepper, D. (2005) Utopianism and environmentalism. Environmental Politics 14(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roszak, T. (1992) The Voice of the Earth: An Exploration of Ecopsychology. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  15. Samuels, A. (1993) ‘I am a place’: Depth psychology and environmentalism. British Journal of Psychotherapy 10(2): 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shepard, P. (1982) Nature and Madness. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  17. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968) General Systems Theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  18. Weintrobe, S. (2013) Introduction. In: S. Weintrobe (ed.) Engaging with Climate Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, E.O. (1986) Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zimmerman, M.E. (1997) Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations