, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 511–523 | Cite as

Is Dante a cosmopolitan?

  • Mary Elizabeth SullivanEmail author
Original Article


This article attempts to answer the question ‘Is Dante a Cosmopolitan?’ or, more specifically, ‘Does Dante’s advocacy for a world empire in Monarchia constitute a cosmopolitan theory of politics?’ Cosmopolitanism grew out of fifth-century B.C.E. Greece and has gained increasing traction among both moral philosophers and political scientists in recent decades. Contemporary scholars, particularly in the field of international relations theory, often list Dante as an early advocate for global governance. Dante is offered as a stepping stone between the cosmopolitans of the ancient world and Kantian liberals. Yet none of these scholars have really explored how well Monarchia fits into this tradition. This paper examines the text of Dante’s Monarchia in light of cosmopolitan political theory. It finds that, while Dante does share some key concerns with modern cosmopolitan thinkers, he ultimately fails to provide a model (even a primitive one) of cosmopolitan ethics or cosmopolitan government.


  1. Alighieri, D. 1961. The Divine Comedy (3 volumes), trans. J.D. Sinclair. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alighieri, D. 1996. Monarchy, trans. P. Shaw. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, K.A. 2000. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  4. Audi, R. 2009. Nationalism, Patriotism, and Cosmopolitanism in an Age of Globalization. The Journal of Ethics 13: 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dallmayr, F. 2003. Cosmopolitanism: Moral and Political. Political Theory 31: 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diogenes Laertius. 1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers, ed. R.D. Hicks.
  7. Euben, P. 2001. The Polis, Globalization, and the Politics of Place. In Democracy and Vision: Sheldon Wolin and the Vicissitudes of the Political, eds. A. Botwinick and W.E. Connolly, 256–90. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hassner P. 1994. Beyond the Three Traditions: The Philosophy of War and Peace in Historical Perspective. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 70: 737–56.Google Scholar
  9. Held, D. 2003. Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed? Review of International Studies 29: 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinsley, F.H. 1963. Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kant, I. 2003. To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, trans. T. Homphrey. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  12. Lijphart, A. 1974. The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 18: 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazower, M. 2012. Governing the World: The Rise and Fall of an Idea, 1815 to Present. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Mehta, P. B. 2000. Cosmopolitanism and the Circle of Reason. Political Theory 28: 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, M. C. 2005. Power and the Holy in the Age of the Investiture Conflict: A Brief History with Documents. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  16. Murphy, C. N. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance since 1850. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Nussbaum, M. 1999. In Defense of Universal Values. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pieterse, J.N. 2006. Emancipatory Cosmopolitanism: Towards an Agenda. Development and Change 36: 1247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pogge, T.W. 1992 Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty. Ethics 103: 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stone, G.P. 2005. Sodomy, Diversity, Cosmopolitanism: Dante and the Limits of the Polis. Dante Studies 123: 89–132.Google Scholar
  21. Sullivan, M.E. 2007. Justice, Temptation, and the Limits of Princely Virtue in Dante’s Conception of the Monarch. In Princely Virtue in the Middle Ages, 1200–1500, eds I. Bejzy and C. Nederman, 123–38. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tierney, B. 1988. The Crisis of Church and State, 1050–1300. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  24. Waldron, J. 2000. What is Cosmopolitan? Journal of Political Philosophy 8: 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weiss, T.G. 2009. What Happened to the Idea of World Government? International Studies Quarterly 53: 253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Central ArkansasConwayUSA

Personalised recommendations