, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 455–466 | Cite as

Fruit and rot: Vegetal theology in Perceforest

  • Brooke Heidenreich FindleyEmail author
Original Article


In the French prose romance Perceforest, an extended passage describes the Creator as a tree bearing the world’s creatures on its branches like fruit. The fruit draws nourishment from the tree as from a breast before coming to ripeness, falling to the ground, rotting, and eventually being resurrected in a new form. The imagery of fruit and rot evokes Eucharistic and alchemical traditions, suggesting a vegetal model of death and resurrection. In Perceforest, rot is an essential part of a cyclical cosmos, while bodies that refuse to rot are dangerous and must be destroyed. By purging the British forests of unrotted bodies, the hero Gallafur restores the vegetal cycle of decay and rebirth, and shows himself to be worthy of the throne.


  1. Aucassin et Nicolette. 1984. ed. J. Dufournet. Paris, France: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  2. Bagliani, A.P. 2001. The Corpse in the Middle Ages: The Problem of the Division of the Body. In The Medieval World, eds. P. Linehan and J.L. Nelson, 327–41. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bynum, C.W. 1991. Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
  4. Chrétien de Troyes. 1909. Philomena, ed. C. de Boer. Paris, France: Librairie Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
  5. Findley, B.H. 2016. The King’s Tree Body: The Taming of the Wilderness and the Ecology of Kingship in Perceforest. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 46(2): 233–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenhill, E.S. 1954. The Child in the Tree: A Study of the Cosmological Tree in Christian Tradition. Traditio 10: 323–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guillaume de Deguileville. 1895. Le Pèlerinage de l’âme, ed. J.J. Stürzinger. London: Nichols & Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Linden, S.J. 2003. The Alchemy Reader: From Hermes Trismegistus to Isaac Newton. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marder, M. 2013. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. McWhorter, L. 1999. Bodies and Pleasures: Foucault and the Politics of Sexual Normalization. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Orland, B. 2013. Why Could Early Modern Men Lactate? Gender Identity and Metabolic Narrations in Humoral Medicine. In Medieval and Renaissance Lactations: Images, Rhetorics, Practices, ed. J.G. Sperling, 37–54. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Perceforest. 1999. Part II, Vol. I of Textes Littéraires Français 506, ed. G. Roussineau. Geneva, Switzerland: Droz.Google Scholar
  13. Perceforest. 2015. Part VI, Vol. I of Textes Littéraires Français 631, ed. G. Roussineau. Geneva, Switzerland: Droz.Google Scholar
  14. Steel, K. 2013. Abyss: Everything is Food. postmedieval 4(1): 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yalom, M. 1998. A History of the Breast. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Arts and HumanitiesPennsylvania State University–AltoonaAltoonaUSA

Personalised recommendations