Advertisement

postmedieval

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Myth-science as residual culture and magical thinking

Original Article

References

  1. Adorno, T. and M. Horkheimer. 1969. Dialectic of the Enlightenment, trans. J. Cummings. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. 2004. Matter and Memory, trans. N.M. Paul and W.S. Palmer. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bracewell, M., M. Clark, and A. Rowlands, eds. 2009. The Dark Monarch: Magic and Modernity in British Art. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Brassier, R. 2011. The View from Nowhere. Identities: Journal of Politics, Gender and Culture 8(2): 7–23.Google Scholar
  5. Centre for Cybernetic Research, Ccru. 2015. Ccru: Writings 19972003. Shanghai: Time Spiral Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, E. 1988. Techgnosis: Myth, Magic and Mysticism in the Age of Information. New York: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus, trans. B. Massumi. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition, trans. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dinshaw, C. 2012. How Soon is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon, T. 2015. Magical Aesthetics: Subjectivity, Simondon, Animism and the Aesthetic. MA Dissertation. Goldsmiths University.Google Scholar
  11. Eshun, K. 1988. More Brilliant than the Sun: Adventures in Sonic Fiction. London: Quartet.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, M. 2014. Ghosts of My Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures. London: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  13. Frazer, J.G. 1957. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Hardy, R. dir. 1973. The Wicker Man.Google Scholar
  15. Hoban, R. 1980. Riddley Walker. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  16. Home, S. 2002. Sixty-Nine Things to Do with a Dead Princess. London: Canongate.Google Scholar
  17. Jarman, D., dir. 1971. Journey to Avebury.Google Scholar
  18. Kelley, M. 1995. Myth Science. In Oyvind Fahlstrom: The Installations, 19–27. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.Google Scholar
  19. Laboria Cuboniks. n.d. Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation. http://www.laboriacuboniks.net.
  20. Lacey, B., dir. 1981. Castlerigg. In The Lacey Rituals: Films by Bruce Lacey (and Friends), 2012. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  21. Lessing, D. 1979–1982. Canopus in Argos: Archives Quartet. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  22. Lippard, L.R. 1983. Overlay: Contemporary Art and the Art of Prehistory. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mackay, R. and A. Avanessian, eds. 2015. Accelerate: The Reader. Falmouth, UK: Urbanomic.Google Scholar
  24. Mellor, D.A. 2012. The Bruce Lacey Experience: Paintings, Sculptures, Installations, Performances. London: Camden Arts Centre.Google Scholar
  25. O’Sullivan, S. 2006. Pragmatics for the Production Of Subjectivity: Time for Probe-Heads. Journal for Cultural Research 10(4): 311–22.Google Scholar
  26. O’Sullivan, S. 2012. On the Production of Subjectivity: Five Diagrams of the Finite–Infinite Relation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Sullivan, S. 2013. A Diagram of the Finite–Infinite Relation: Towards a Bergsonian Production of Subjectivity. In Bergson and the Art of Immanence, eds. J. Mullarkey and C. De Mille, 165–86. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Sullivan, S. 2015. Accelerationism, Prometheanism and Mythotechnesis. In Aesthetics After Finitude, eds. A. Ireland, B. Brits, and P. Gibson, 171–90. Melbourne, Australia: re:press.Google Scholar
  29. O’Sullivan, S. 2017a. Accelerationism, Hyperstition and Myth-Science. Cyclops: Contemporary Theory, Theory of Religion, Experimental Theory 2: 11–44.Google Scholar
  30. O’Sullivan, S. 2017b. From Science Fiction to Science Fictioning: SF’s Traction on the Real. Foundation: The International Review of Science Fiction 126: 74–84.Google Scholar
  31. O’Sullivan, S. 2017c. Memories of a Deleuzian: To Think is Always to Follow the Witches Flight. In A Thousand Plateaus and Philosophy, eds. H. Somers-Hall, J. Bell, and J. Williams, 172–90. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  32. O’Sullivan, S. and O. Stähl. 2006. Contours and Case Studies for a Dissenting Subjectivity (or, How to Live Creatively in a Fearful World). Angelaki 11(1): 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plastique Fantastique (D. Burrows, A. Marzeta, V. Page, and S. O’Sullivan). 2016. Plastique Fantastique Review of the Kibbo Kift: Seven Celebrations/Seven Critiques/Seven Parallels. Visual Culture in Britain 17(2): 225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sames, L.R. 2014. Sci-Fi Paganism. London: Enclave.Google Scholar
  35. Simondon, G. 2011. Extract of on the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, trans. N. Mellamphy, D. Mellamphy and N.B. Mellamphy. Deleuze Studies 5(3): 407–24.Google Scholar
  36. Simondon, G. 2012. Technical Mentality, trans. A. De Boever. In Gilbert Simondon: Being and Technology, eds. A. De Boever, A. Murray, J. Roffe, and A. Woodward, 1–15. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
  37. Srnicek, N. and A. Williams. 2015. Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics. In Accelerate: The Reader, eds. R. Mackay and A. Avanessian, 349–78. Falmouth, UK: Urbanomic.Google Scholar
  38. The Confraternity of Neoflagellants (N. Hogg and N. Mulholland). 2013. thN Lng folk 2go: Investigating Future Premoderns. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  39. Watkins, A. 1974. The Old Straight Track: Its Mounds, Beacons, Moats, Sites and Mark Stones. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, R. 1978. Utopia and Science Fiction. Science Fiction Studies 5(3): 203–14.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, R. 1980. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. In Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays, 31–49. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Visual Cultures, Goldsmiths CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations