Improving the return on investment in ports: opportunities in data management
- 36 Downloads
Ports provide a critical link in the supply chain by connecting sea, air, and land transport. They provide facilities and services for the transfer, storage, inspection, and control of the goods moving both in and out of a country. Inefficient port management can increase costs considerably and hamper the timeliness of delivery. Many traditional industry techniques fail to capitalize on the global nature of data, thereby omitting the maximum benefit available. The objective of this research is to investigate issues associated with inefficient port operations and suggest new disruptive methods for resolving them. This research proposes to examine the factors of accepted industry practice, data management, and enterprise asset management to help link and streamline operational processes at sea ports. Specifically, we look at the accepted definition of a Port Community System and expand this to a Port Eco-System (PES), a system that includes the addition of interdependent stakeholders. Through the lens of a PES, this research concludes that ports can substantially improve their existing return on investment, by as much as 30% or more, through the streamlining of operational processes.
KeywordsPort management Data management Operational streamlining Transportation Return on investment
- Brooks, M. R. 2001. Good governance and ports as tools of economic development: Are they compatible? Proceedings of the International Association of MAritime Economists Annual Conference, 1–19. Hong Kong: International Association of MAritime Economists.Google Scholar
- Clearswift. 2015. Information visibility: Reducing business risk. White Paper. www.clearswift.com.
- CMAIS. 1999. Applying advanced information systems to ports and waterways management. National Academy of Science, Committee on Maritime Advanced Information Systems. Washington, DC: Nation Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Cong, G., Fan, W., Geerts, F., and Jia, X. (2007). Improving data quality: Consistency and accuracy. Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, 23–27. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
- Deming, W.E. 1982. Out of the crisis. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Studies.Google Scholar
- ESCAP. 2016. Regional study: The use of Logistics Information Systems for increased efficiency and effectiveness. New York: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Transport and Tourism Division, United Nations.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2016. www.ec.europa.eu.
- Ford, R., and D. Zussman. 1997. Alternative service delivery: Transending boundaries. In Aternative service delivery: Sharing governance in Canada, ed. R.Z. Ford. Toronto: IPAC/KPMG.Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, M. 2016. CEO, I2A Phillipines, Bonifacio Global City, Philippines.Google Scholar
- IPCSA. (2014). Port community systems. (I. P. Association, Editor). http://www.epcsa.eu/pcs.
- Klein, R., and A. Rai. 2009. Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Quarterly 33 (4): 735–762.Google Scholar
- Legner, C., and J. Schemm. 2008. Towards the inter-organizational product informaiton supply chain: Evidence from the retail and consumer goods industry. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (3/4): 115–150.Google Scholar
- Mathas, S., N. Ramasubbu, and V. Sambamurthy. 2001. How information management capability influences frim performance. MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 237–256.Google Scholar
- MSPCC. 2006. The maritime infrastructure recover plan for the National Strategy for Maritime Security. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Maritime Security Policy Coordinating Committee.Google Scholar
- Muro, S., Ibaraki, T., Miyajima, H., and Hasegawa, T. 1983. File redundancy issues in distributed database systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 275-277. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Nakatani, k, T.T. Chuang, and D. Zhou. 2006. Data synchronization technology: Standards, business values, and implimentations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 17 (1): 44.Google Scholar
- Notteboom, T., and J.P. Rodrigue. 2006. Challenges in the maritime-land interface: Maritime freight and logistics. In The master development plan for port logistics parks in Korea, ed. C.E. Target, 301–332. Soeul: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
- Osborne, D., and Gaebler, T. 1992. Introduction: An American perestroika. In Reinventing Government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Pires, A., G. Putruik, and P. Avila. 2012. A survey analysis of the resource selection models in agile/virtual enterprises. Journal of Applied REsearch Technology 10: 416–427.Google Scholar
- Rodal, A., and N. Mulder. 1993. Partnerships, devolution and power sharing: issues and implications for management. Optimal, the Journal of Public Sector Management 24: 27–48.Google Scholar
- Street, C.T., and D.B. Meister. 2004. Small business growth and internal transparency: The role of information systems. MIS Quarterly 2 (3): 473–506.Google Scholar
- UNCTAD. 2016a. Harnessing emerging technological breakthroughs for the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Policy Brief No. 45, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
- UNCTAD. 2016b. Review of maritime transport 2016. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. New York, NY: United Nations. http://unctad.org/rmt.
- Waller, M., M.E. Johnson, and T. Davis. 1999. Vendor-managed inventory in the retail supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics 20 (1): 183–203.Google Scholar
- World Bank. 2016. Port Reform Toolkit. Transport@worldbank.org: https://ppiaf.org/sites/ppiaf.org/files/documents/toolkits/Portoolkit/Toolkit/index.html.