Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 234–273 | Cite as

Network assignment model of integrating maritime and hinterland container shipping: application to Central America

  • Ryuichi ShibasakiEmail author
  • Takayuki Iijima
  • Taiji Kawakami
  • Takashi Kadono
  • Tatsuyuki Shishido
Original Article


The authors develop a model to predict worldwide container movements including both maritime and land shipping network from the viewpoint of cargo owners, given the liner shipping network provided by shipping companies and the level of service in each port. The network assignment methodology is applied to both an intermodal shipping network and maritime shipping sub-network, by which the solution can be obtained in a huge, real-scale network including more than 150 worlds’ container ports as well as some hinterland network of the world. The developed model is applied to the Central American region, where the international maritime containers are often transported across national borders by land. It is confirmed that the model output agrees with the actual container movement in terms of the container cargo throughput for each port, land container flow, and maritime flow by shipping company in Central America. Also, the model sensitivity to key parameters included in the model is confirmed reasonable. Finally, it is also confirmed that the model can predict the volume of containers handled in the port of La Union, where no liner service had previously called and a new liner service calls.


international container cargo intermodal shipping network stochastic network assignment model generalized shipping cost ocean freight charge Central America 


  1. APL, Service Finder (currently the details of the liner service which called at port of La Union are not available since it was suspended in December 2012).
  2. Bell, M.G.H., Liu, X., Angeloudis, P., Fonzone, A. and Hosseinloo, S.H. (2011) A frequency-based maritime container assignment model. Transportation Research 45B: 1152–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K. and Ronen, D. (2004) Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transportation Science 38(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B. and Ronen, D. (2007) Maritime transportation. In: Barnhart, C. and Laporte, G. (eds.) Handbook in Operations Research and Management, Volume 14: Transportation. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 189–284.Google Scholar
  5. Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B. and Ronen, D. (2013) Ship routing and scheduling: In the new millennium. European Journal of Operational Research 228: 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Central American Commission of Maritime Transport (COCATRAM), Maritime and Port Statistics (in Spanish).
  7. Drewry Maritime Research (2011a) Container market review and forecast, Annual Report 2011/12. London, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Drewry Maritime Research (2011b) Ship Operating Costs Annual Review and Forecast 2011/12. London, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Fan, L, Wilson, W. W. and Tolliver, D. (2009) Logistical rivalries and port competition for container flows to US markets: Impacts of changes in Canada’s logistics system and expansion of the Panama Canal. Maritime Economics & Logistics 11(4): 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan, L., Wilson, W.W. and Dahl, B. (2012) Congestion, port expansion and spatial competition for US container imports. Transportation Research 48E: 1121–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haralambides, H.E. (2008) Structure and operations in the liner shipping industry. In: Hensher, D.A. and Button, K.J. (eds) Handbook of Transport Modelling (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 761–775.Google Scholar
  12. Ieda, H., Shibasaki, R., Naito, S. and Mishima, D. (2000) Model development for East Asian container shipping considering multifarious use of vessels and ports. World Conference on Transportation Research Proceedings 8(3): 213–226.Google Scholar
  13. Informa UK Ltd., CI-online impossible to access).
  14. Lacayo, M., Romero, J., Callejas, P., Canales, M., Castillo, A., Kadono, T. and Shibasaki, R. (2014) Analysis on changes of container market share among Central American Ports caused by Salvadoran port development. Proceedings of the 33rd PIANC World Congress: 1–5 June 2014, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, Z., Meng, Q., Wan, S. and Sun, Z. (2014) Global intermodal liner shipping network design. Transportation Research 61E: 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malcow, M. and Kanafani, A. (2001) A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection. Maritime Policy and Management 28(3): 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MDS Transmodal Inc., MDS containership databank.Google Scholar
  18. Meng, Q., Wang, S., Andersson, H. and Thun, K. (2014) Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: overview and future research directions. Transportation Science 48(2): 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meng, Q., Wang, S., and Liu, Z. (2012) Network design for shipping service of large-scale intermodal liners. Transportation Research Record 2269: 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meng, Q. and Wang, X. (2011) Intermodal hub-and-spoke network design: Incorporating multiple stakeholders and multi-type containers. Transportation Research Part 45B: 724–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ronen, D. (1983) Cargo ships routing and scheduling: survey of models and problems. European Journal of Operational Research 12(2): 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ronen, D. (1993) Ship scheduling: the last decade. European Journal of Operational Research 71(3): 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheffi, Y. (1985) Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Shibasaki, R., Ieda, H. and Watanabe, T. (2005) An international container shipping model in East Asia and its transferability. In: A. Kanafani and K. Kuroda (eds.) Global Competition in Transportation MarketsAnalysis and Policy Making (Research in Transportation Economics vol. 13). Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 299–336.Google Scholar
  25. Shibasaki, R. (2011) A cost minimization model of a large-scale international maritime container shipping network regarding characteristics of ports. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting: 23–27 January 2011, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Shibasaki, R. and Watanabe, T. (2012) Large-scale simulation model of international maritime container shipping considering shippers’ and carriers’ behaviour. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of Regional Association Science International: 9–12 May 2012, Timisoara, Rumania.Google Scholar
  27. Shibasaki, R., Azuma, T., Watanabe, T. and Toriumi, S. (2013) A container cargo assignment model on a real international maritime shipping network and application to the Suez Canal transit analysis. Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME 2013); 03–05 July 2013, Marseille, France.Google Scholar
  28. Suez Canal Authority, Suez Canal Toll Circular
  29. Tavasszy, L., Minderhoud, M., Perrin, J. F. and Notteboom, T. (2011) A strategic network choice model for global container flows: specification, estimation and application. Journal of Transport Geography 19: 1163–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Toriumi, S. (2010) Pattern analysis of containerships using maritime shipping network. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 55(6): 359–367. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. United Nations, UN comtrade database
  32. Wang, S., Meng, Q. and Sun, Z. (2013) Container routing in liner shipping. Transportation Research 49E: 1–7.Google Scholar
  33. World Bank Group, Doing Business Website

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryuichi Shibasaki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takayuki Iijima
    • 2
  • Taiji Kawakami
    • 3
  • Takashi Kadono
    • 4
  • Tatsuyuki Shishido
    • 5
  1. 1.International Coordination DivisionNational Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT)YokosukaJapan
  2. 2.Port and Harbor Bureau, Tokyo Metropolitan GovernmentTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Logistics Industries Affairs, Policy BureauMLITTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Tohoku District Transport BureauMLITTokyoJapan
  5. 5.The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan (OCDI)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations