Modelling the global maritime container network

Abstract

Travel demand modelling has a long history going back to 50s when the conventional four-step modelling structure was introduced and developed for Chicago and Detroit, USA. However, the first travel demand models for freight movements were not developed until 40 years after the first model for passenger cars. Freight models are yet limited to studies looking at goods movements by truck and rail. This paper explores the effectiveness of the conventional travel demand modelling techniques for maritime container movements. Two approaches for modelling the movement of trade in the global maritime container network are discussed. The conventional methods of trip generation and distribution are applied in a sequential model, and compared against an alternative joint model methodology. Results show that the sequential methodology achieves high accuracy, while the joint methodology reveals more detailed trade relationships. Significant relationships are revealed, such as the varying influence of airports, the negative impact of coastline length and the impact of being an island, on containerised trade volumes. The findings of this paper provide a basis for modelling the container network from a transportation discipline viewpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  1. Anderson, J.E. (2011) The gravity model. Annual Review of Economics 3: 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J.E. and Wincoop, E.V. (2004) Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature 42(3): 691–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Auld, J., Hossein Rashidi, T. and Lin, J. (2009) Analysis of National Country-Level Heavy-Duty Freight Truck Emissions. Orlando, FL: Transportation, Land Use, Planning and Air Quality, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baier, S.L. and Bergstrand, H.J. (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics 71(1): 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barigozzi, M., Fagiolo, G. and Garlaschelli, D. (2010) Multinetwork of international trade: A commodity-specific analysis. Physical Review E 81(4): 046104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell, M.G., Liu, X., Rioult, J. and Angeloudis, P. (2013) A cost-based maritime container assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 58: 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensassia, S., Martinez-Zarzoso, I. and Suárez, C. (2014) The effect of maritime transport costs on the extensive and intensive margins: Evidence from the Europe–Asia trade. Maritime Economics and Logistics 16(3): 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergstrand, J.H. (1984) The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P.O. and Morgenroth, L.E. (1999) Infrastructure, transport costs and trade. Journal of International Economics 47: 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burgess, A. et al. (2008) TRANS-TOOL Final Report, http://www.transport-research.info/sites/default/files/project/documents/20100304_172116_94411_TRANSTOOLS%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf, accessed 11 January 2015.

  11. Carrere, C. (2006) Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review 50(2): 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chou, C.-C., Chu, C.-W. and Liang, G.-S. (2008) A modified regression model for forecasting the volumes of Taiwan’s import containers. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 47(1): 797–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Egger, P. (2000) A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economics Letters 66: 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elsdon, P. and Burdall, T. (2004) Container Terminal Planning and Design, s.l.: Ports 2001.

  15. Ferguson, M. et al. (2012) Transferability and enhancement of a microsimulation model for estimating urban commercial vehicle movements. Journal of Transport Geography 24: 358–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gosasang, V., Chandraprakaikul, W. and Kiattisin, S. (2011) A comparison of traditional and neural networks forecasting techniques for container throughput at bangkok port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 27(3): 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IHS Maritime & Trade (2016) IHS World Trade Service, https://www.ihs.com/pdf/World-Trade-Service_205126110913044932.pdf, accessed 11 January 2015.

  18. Kaluza, P., Kolzsch, A., Gastner, M.T. and Blasius, B. (2010) The complex network of global cargo ship movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7(48): 1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lam, H.W., Ng, L.P., Seabrooke, W. and Hui, C.E. (2004) Forecasts and reliability analysis of port cargo throughput in Hong Kong. Journal of urban Planning and Development 130: 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lightfoot, A., Bolin, R. and Lubulwa, G. (2009) Australian Sea Port Activity to 202930. s.l.: Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics.

  21. Limao, N. and Venables, A.J. (2001) Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, trasport costs, and trade. The World Bank Economic Review 15(3): 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, M. and Grigalunas, T.A. (2003) A spatial-economic multimodal transportation simulation model For US Coastal Container Ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5(2): 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mansfield, E.D. and Milner, H.V. (2010) Regime type, veto points, and preferential trading arrangements. Stanford Journal of International Law 46: 219.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marcouiller, D. and Anderson, J.E. (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and statistics 84(2): 342–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez-Zarzoso, I. and Nowak-Lehmann, F. (2003) Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur–European union trade flows. Journal of Applied Economics 6(2): 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newton, S. (2009) WORLDNET Final Report (D11). Zoetermeer: NEA Transport Research and Training.

  27. Nuzzolo, A., Crisalli, U. and Comi, A. (2013) An aggregate transport demand model for import and export flow simulation. Transport 30: 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016) Metro Version 1 Model Documentation, http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=TAD/TC/WP(2014)24/FINAL&docLanguage=En, accessed 11 January 2015.

  29. Oxford Economics (2015) Global Economic Model, http://www.oxfordeconomics.com/forecasts-and-models/countries/scenario-analysis-and-modeling/global-economic-model/overview, accessed 11 January 2015.

  30. Rodrigue, J.-P. (2013) The Geography of Transport Systems, 3rd edn. New York: Hofstra University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. and Sapienza, P. (2006) Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sinha-Ray, P. et al. (2003) Container World: GLOBAL Agent-Based Modelling of the Container Transport Business. In Proceedings 4th Workshop of Agent-Based Simulation, Montpellier.

  33. Taplin, G.B. (1967) Models of world trade. Staff Papers 14(3): 433–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. The UNCTAD Secretariat (2012) Review of Maritime Transport. Geneva: United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Viton, P.A. (1994) Calibrating the Gravity Model, Working Paper. Columbus: Department of City and Regional Planning, The Ohio State University.

  36. World Trade Organisation (2013) World Trade Report 2013. s.l.: World Trade Organisation.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taha Hossein Rashidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Rashidi, T.H. & Gardner, L. Modelling the global maritime container network. Marit Econ Logist 20, 400–420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-016-0047-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • transport
  • modelling
  • container
  • network
  • 4-step modelling