Advertisement

Latino Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 65–90 | Cite as

The social meaning of Spanish in Miami: Dialect perceptions and implications for socioeconomic class, income, and employment

  • Phillip M. Carter
  • Salvatore Callesano
Original Article

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the ways in which three national-origin varieties of Spanish commonly heard in metropolitan Miami—Cuban, Colombian, and Peninsular—are conceptualized by young adult residents of Miami-Dade County in terms of implicit perception. Further, we test whether or not perceptions about Spanish can predict social outcomes in the domains of labor, employment, and income. Three male residents of Miami were asked to read a text in their home variety of Spanish. All men were college educated in their respective countries of origin (Cuba, Colombia, and Spain) and are professionally employed in Miami. For each voice heard, participants were given background information about the speaker, including the parents’ country of origin. In some cases, the parents’ national-origin label matched the country of origin of the speaker (Speaker: Cuba, Origin-label: Cuba), but in other cases, the background information and voices were mismatched (Speaker: Cuba, Origin-label: Spain). This manipulation allows us to separate the perceptions based on the elements of the speech signal from the provided social information. Participants were asked to rate the voice/background permutations on five-point Likert-scales for a range of personal characteristics. Data were analyzed for significance using a three (dialect) X four (label) within-subjects ANOVA with a series of specific statistical contrasts. Our analyses of these judgments showed three kinds of significant effects: (1) main effects of language variety, (2) main effects of the background label, and (3) interaction effects. Overall, we find that adolescent Latin@s in Miami-Dade exhibit divergent perceptions of national-origin varieties of Spanish and that they use sociolinguistic differences to make predictive judgments about nonlinguistic, social attributes related to socioeconomic class, including family wealth, personal income, and profession.

Keywords

Miami Spanish Dialect perception Sociolinguistics Cuban Spanish Latinidad 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the three anonymous external reviewers for their invaluable feedback on the manuscript, to Andrew Lynch and Melissa Baralt for their feedback at various stages of the research and writing process, and to David Neal for his expertise in study design and statistical analysis. We are especially indebted to Scott Schwenter for suggesting that we pursue this line of research, and to Sarah Mahler for including our study in this special edition and for providing invaluable feedback on several drafts of the manuscript. Any errors herein are our own.

References

  1. Alfaraz, G. 2002. Miami Cuban Perceptions of Varieties of Spanish. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 2, ed. D. Long, and D. Preston, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  2. Alfaraz, G. 2014. Dialect Perceptions in Real Time: A Restudy of Miami Cuban Perceptions. Journal of Linguistic Geography 2 (2): 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  4. Babel, A. 2014. Stereotypes Versus Experience: Indexing Regional Identity in Bolivian Valley Spanish. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18 (5): 604–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baugh, J. 2003. Linguistic Profiling. In Black Linguistics: Language, Society, and Politics in Africa and the Americas, ed. S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A.F. Ball, and A.K. Spears, 155–168. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B) 57: 289–300.Google Scholar
  7. Blom, J.P., and J.J. Gumperz. 1972. Social Meaning in Linguistic Structures: Code Switching in Northern Norway. In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. J.J. Gumperz, and D. Hymes, 407–434. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2013. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Computer program).Version 5.3.23. http://www.praat.org/.
  9. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bradac, J.J., and R. Wisegarver. 1984. Ascribed Status, Lexical Diversity, and Accent: Determinants of Perceived Status, Solidarity, and Control Of Speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3 (4): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, A., and M.H. Lopez. 2013. Mapping the Latino Population by State, County, and City. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, A., and E. Patten. 2013. Hispanics of Cuban Origin in the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  14. Bucholtz, M., N. Bermudez, L. Edwards, V. Fung, and R. Vargas. 2007. Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal?: The Perceptual Dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 35 (4): 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter, P.M. 2013. Shared Spaces, Shared Structures: Latino Social Formation and African American English in the U.S. South. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (1): 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, P.M., and A. Lynch. 2014. Ideological Dimensions of Speech Perception in Bilingual Miami. Madison, WI: Paper delivered at Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. April.Google Scholar
  17. Carter, P.M., and A. Lynch. 2015. Multilingual Miami: Current Trends in Sociolinguistic Research. Language and Linguistics Compass 9 (9): 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cedergren, H. 1973. The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Docherty, G., C. Langstrof, and P. Folkes. 2013. Listener Evaluation of Sociophonetic Variability: Probing Constraints and Capabilities. Linguistics 51 (2): 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duany, J. 1998. Reconstructing Racial Identity: Ethnicity, Color, and Class among Dominicans in the United States and Puerto Rico. Latin American Perspectives 25 (3): 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Eckert, P. 2005. Variation, Convention, and Social Meaning. Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Vol. 7. Oakland, CA: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
  23. Escobar, A.M., and K. Potowski. 2015. El Español de los Estados Unidos. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Eurostat. 2015. Youth Unemployment. Eurostat: Statistics Explained. 1 September. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Youth_unemployment.
  25. Feagin, C. 1979. Variation and Change in Alabama English: A Sociolinguistic Study of the White Community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fought, C. 2002. California Students’ Perceptions of, You Know, Regions and Dialects. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 2, ed. D. Long, and D. Preston, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  27. Fridland, V., and K. Bartlett. 2006. Correctness, Pleasantness, and Degree of Difference Ratings across Regions. American Speech 81 (4): 358–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fridland, V., K. Bartlett, and R. Kreuz. 2004. Do You Hear What I Hear? Experimental Measurement of the Perceptual Salience of Acoustically Manipulated Vowel Variants by Southern Speakers in Memphis. TN. Language Variation and Change 16 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  29. Fuller, J. 2012. Bilingual Pre-teens: Competing Ideologies and Multiple Identities in the US and Germany. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. García, O., I. Evangelista, M. Martínez, C. Disla, and B. Paulino. 1988. Spanish Language Use and Attitudes: A Study of Two New York City Communities. Language in Society 17 (4): 475–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guy, G. 2005. Grammar and Usage: A Variationist Response. Language 81 (3): 561–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horvath, B. 1985. Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics London 45: 1–200.Google Scholar
  33. Irvine, J. 1989. When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy. American Ethnologist 16 (2): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  35. Lambert, W.E., R.C. Hodgson, R.C. Gardner, and S. Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60 (1): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lavandera, B. 1978. Where Does the Sociolinguistic Variable Stop? Language in Society 7 (2): 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lippi-Green, R. 1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Lopez, M. H., A. Gonzalez-Barrera, and D. Cuddington. 2013. Diverse Origins: The Nation’s 14 Largest Hispanic-Origin Groups. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/06/19/diverse-origins-the-nations-14-largest-hispanic-origin-groups/.
  39. Lynch, A. 2009. A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Final/s/ in Miami Cuban Spanish. Language Sciences 31 (6): 766–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Macías, R. 1985. Language and Ideology in the United States. Social Education 49 (2): 97–100.Google Scholar
  41. Massey, D., and G. Lundy. 2001. Use of Black English and Racial Discrimination in Urban Housing Markets: New Methods and Findings. Urban Affairs Review 36 (4): 470–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mendoza-Denton, N. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Modaressi, Y. 1978. A Sociolinguistic Investigation of Modern Persian. PhD dissertation, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  44. Mojica de León, C.M. 2014. Una mirada hacia las actitudes lingüística en Puerto Rico. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 5: 1249–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Naro, A. 1981. The Social and Structural Dimensions of a Syntactic Change. Language 57 (1): 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Niedzielski, N. 1999. The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18 (1): 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Niedzielski, N., and Preston. 2000. Folk Linguistics. In Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, vol. 122, ed. W. Winter. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  48. Omi, M., and H. Winant. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Otheguy, R., O. García, and A. Roca. 2000. Speaking in Cuban: The Language of Cuban Americans. In New Immigrants in the United States: Readings for Second Language Educators, ed. S. McKay, and S.C. Wong, 165–188. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Otheguy, R., A.C. Zentella, and D. Livert. 2007. Language and Dialect Contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the Formation of a Speech Community. Language 83 (4): 770–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Otheguy, R., and A.C. Zentella. 2012. Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poplack, S. 1980. Sometimes I’ll Start a Sentence in Spanish y Termino en Español: Toward a Typology of Code-switching. Linguistics 18 (7–8): 581–618.Google Scholar
  53. Porcel, J. 2006. The Paradox of Spanish among Miami Cubans. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (1): 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Portes, A., and R. Schauffler. 1996. Language and the Second Generation: Bilingualism Yesterday and Today. In The New Second Generation, ed. A. Portes, 8–29. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Preston, D.R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Preston, D.R. 1993. Folk Dialectology. In American Dialect Research, ed. D.R. Preston, 333–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Preston, D.R. 1996. Whaddayaknow? The Modes of Folk Linguistic Awareness. Language Awareness 5 (1): 40–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Preston, D. R. 1999. A Language Attitude Approach to the Perception of Regional Variety. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, ed. D. R. Preston, vol. 1. Trans. B. E. Evans. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  59. Preston, 2002. Perceptual Dialectology: Aims, Methods, Findings. In Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, vol. 137, ed. W. Winter, and W. Bisand, 57–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  60. Purnell, T., W. Idsari, and J. Baugh. 1999. Perceptual and Phonetic Experiments on American English Dialect Identification. Journal of Social Psychology 18 (1): 10–30.Google Scholar
  61. Quesada Pacheco, M.A. 2015. División dialectal del Español de América según sus hablantes: Análisis dialectológico perceptual. Boletín de Filología 49 (2): 257–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rickford, J.R., and S. King. 2016. Language and Linguistics on Trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and Other Vernacular Speakers) in the Courtroom and Beyond. Language 92 (4): 948–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Santa Ana, O. 2002. Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shuy, R.W., W. Wolfram, and W.K. Riley. 1968. Field Techniques in an Urban Language Study, vol. 3. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  65. Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life. Language & Communication 23 (3): 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Slomanson, P., and M. Newman. 2004. Peer Group Identification and Variation in New York Latino English Laterals. English World Wide 25 (2): 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sobrino Triana, R., L.E. Montero Bernal, and A.J. Menéndez Pryce. 2014. Actitudes lingüísticas en Cuba. Cambios positivos hacia la variante nacional de lengua. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 5: 290–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stepick, A., G. Grenier, M. Castro, and M. Dunn. 2003. This Land is Our Land: Immigrants and Power in Miami. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Suárez Büdenbender, E.M. 2013. “Te conozco bacalao”: Investigating the Influence of Social Stereotypes on Linguistic Attitudes. Hispania 96 (1): 110–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tamasi, S. 2003. Cognitive Patterns of Linguistic Perceptions. PhD dissertation, Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  71. Tetel Andresen, J., and P.M. Carter. 2016. Languages of the World: How History, Culture, and Politics Shape Language. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. US Census Bureau. 2010. 2010 Census. http://www.census.gov/2010census/data/.
  74. Veltman, C. 1988. Modeling the Language Shift Process of Hispanic Immigrants. International Migration Review 22 (4): 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wiley, T., and M. Lukes. 1996. English-Only and Standard English Ideologies in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly 30 (3): 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolfram, W., P.M. Carter, and B. Moriello. 2004. Emerging Hispanic English: New Dialect Formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8 (3): 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wolfram, W., and N. Schilling. 2015. American English: Dialects and Variation, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  78. Zentella, A.C. 1995. The “Chiquitafication” of U.S. Latinos and Their Languages, or: Why We Need an Anthropolitical Linguistics. Proceedings of Symposium about Language and Society III. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  79. Zentella, A.C. 1997. Growing Up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  80. Zentella, A.C. 2014. TWB (Talking while Bilingual): Linguistic Profiling of Latina/os, and Other Linguistic Torquemadas. Latino Studies 12 (4): 620–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zurer Pearson, B., and A. McGee. 1993. Language Choice in Hispanic-background Junior High School Students in Miami: A 1988 Update. In Spanish in the United States: Linguistic Contact and Diversity, ed. A. Roca, and J. Lipski. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations