Management innovation and firm performance: the mediating effects of tacit and explicit knowledge
- 186 Downloads
This paper examines the role of tacit and explicit knowledge in translating management innovation into firm performance in Japanese companies. While past research has been inconsistent on the role of management innovation on firm performance, this research considers how management innovation in organizations can promote tacit and/or explicit knowledge creation, and whether this leads to higher firm performance. This research uses a questionnaire survey of employees of Japanese firms and applies conditional process analysis. There was no direct effect of management innovation onto firm performance, and that instead, both tacit and explicit knowledge fully mediated the relationship between management innovation and firm performance. While management innovation programs by themselves did not directly increase firm performance, the alignment of these programs with knowledge management initiatives enhanced performance. This highlights the need for management innovation that first considers the type of knowledge needed for enhanced performance. Previous research did not consider the role of knowledge as a means to translate management innovation into firm performance. This paper uncovers the mediating role of knowledge, potentially elucidating past inconclusive results.
KeywordsManagement innovation Tacit knowledge Explicit knowledge Firm performance Japan
This study was funded by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI #26380497).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Becerra, M., R. Lunnan, and L. Huemer. 2008. Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management 45 (4): 691–713.Google Scholar
- Botha, A., D. Kourie, and R. Snyman. 2014. Coping with continuous change in the business environment. Burlington: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Chen, E.T., J. Monahan, and D. Feng. 2009. A longitudinal cross-section examination of the implementation of knowledge management systems and firm performance. Journal of International Technology and Information Management 18 (2): 223–238.Google Scholar
- Costello, A.B., and J.W. Osborne. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 10: 1–9.Google Scholar
- Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. 1998. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Eldring, J. 2009. Porter’s 1980 generic strategies, performance and risk: An empirical investigation with german data. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.Google Scholar
- Foster, R., and S. Kaplan. 2001. Creative destruction. New York: Currency/Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Hansen, M.T., N. Nohria, and T. Tierney. 1999. What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review 77 (2): 106–116.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A.F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
- Hislop, D. 2013. Knowledge management in organizations, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kurzweil, R. (2001). The law of accelerating returns. http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns.
- Lam, A. 2005. Organizational innovation. In Oxford handbook of innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson, 115–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Martin, A. (2015). ‘Englishnization’ Advances at Rakuten. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2015/05/08/englishnization-advances-at-rakuten/.
- Mukherji, S. 2005. Knowledge management strategy in software services organizations: Straddling codification and personalization. IIMB Management Review 17 (3): 33–39.Google Scholar
- Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MA.: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
- Rakuten (2015). Next 20 Years Annual Report. Available at: http://global.rakuten.com/corp/investors/documents/pdf/15-1_CEOMessage&FinancialHighlights.pdf.
- Schumpeter, J. 1961. The theory of economic development; an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Translated from German by Redvers Opie.Google Scholar
- Simpson, M., N. Tuck, and S. Bellamy. 2004. Small business success factors: the role of education and training. Education + Training 46 (8/9): 481–491.Google Scholar