Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-based differential pricing for a make-to-order production system in a competitive segmented market

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

Optimal queuing system design includes deciding about some variables such as location, capacity, price, and delivery time. In order to develop an optimized system, it is essential to solve the optimization problem for all the decision variables simultaneously. In this paper, a make-to-order system is considered. In this system, some facilities are developed in different points. According to the make-to-order system definition, these facilities keep no inventory from final product. Orders are received from customers and the requested products are assembled. Due to existence of some differences among customers, they are divided into two distinct categories including express and regular customers. Each category has purchasing and upgrading demand. Upgrading demand is related to the used products that are referred to the facilities by reverse logistics for upgrade. Profit is maximized through attracting these two types of demand from different demand points. Utilizing market segmentation, different prices can be offered to each category. Difference in price is due to difference in delivery time. It means maximum guaranteed time to deliver the product. This obligation raises customer satisfaction. But lower delivery time causes increase in price and lower power in competition. Increase is price is due to designing a queue with higher capacity. In this problem, location of facilities should be selected among some potential points. There are several competitors in each potential location. Each facility is modeled as a queuing system. In these systems, decision variables are location, capacity, price, and delivery time. Finally, the optimization problem is solved by the genetic algorithm and the optimized value for each variable is gained. Facilities with these variables will have the maximum profit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboolian, R., O. Berman, and Z. Drezner. 2008. Location and allocation of service units on a congested network. IIE Transactions 40 (4): 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aboolian, R., O. Berman, and Z. Drezner. 2009. The multiple server center location problem. Annals of Operations Research 167 (1): 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abouee-Mehrizi, H., S. Babri, O. Berman, and H. Shavandi. 2011. Optimizing capacity, pricing and location decisions on a congested network with balking. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 74 (2): 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-011-0361-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, A. 1997. Solution procedures for the service system design problem. Computers & Operations Research 24 (1): 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, O., O. Berman, and D. Krass. 2008. Facility location with stochastic demand and constraints on waiting time. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10 (3): 484–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boronico, J., and A. Panayides. 2001. The joint determination of price, quality, and capacity: An application to supermarket operations. Journal of Applied Mathematics & Decision Sciences 5 (1): 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasci, A., and G. Laporte. 2004. Location and pricing decisions of a multistore monopoly in a spatial market. Journal of Regional Science 44 (3): 489–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, G., and E. Stavrulaki. 2007. Simultaneous price, location, and capacity decisions on a line oftime-sensitive customers. Naval Research Logistics 54 (1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, T., and Z. Drezner. 2011. The gravity multiple server location problem. Computers & Operations Research 38 (3): 694–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjoul, P., P. Hansen, D. Peeters, and J. Thisse. 1990. Uncapacitated plant location under alternative spatial policies. Management Science 36 (1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. 1929. Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov, V., and D. Serra. 1998. Probabilistic maximal covering location–allocation models for congested systems. Journal of Regional Science 38 (3): 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov, V., M. Rios, and M.J. Icaza. 2008. Facility location for market capture when users rank facilities by shorter travel and waiting times. European Journal of Operational Research 191 (1): 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcfadden, D. 1974. The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3 (4): 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangburn, M., and E. Stavrulaki. 2008. Capacity and price setting for dispersed, time-Sensitive customer segments. European Journal of Operational Research 184 (3): 1100–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifbarghy, M., R. Rabieian, and F. Karimi. 2011. Locating service centers optimizing customers’ perspective criteria. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 54 (5–8): 811–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teimoury, E., M. Modarres, A. KazeruniMonfared, and M. Fathi. 2011. Price, delivery time, and capacity decisions in an M/M/1 make-to-order/service system with segmented market’. International journal of advance manufacturing technology. 57 (1–4): 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3261-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., R. Batta, and C.M. Rump. 2002. Algorithms for a facility location problem with stochastic customer demand and immobile servers. Annals of Operations Research 111: 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., J. Ning, S. Lu, D. Ouyang, and T. Ding. 2009. A novel hybrid differential evolution and particle swarm optimization algorithm for unconstrained optimization. Operations Research Letters 37 (2): 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Neishaboori.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teimoury, E., Modarres, M. & Neishaboori, M. Cost-based differential pricing for a make-to-order production system in a competitive segmented market. J Revenue Pricing Manag 19, 266–275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-019-00211-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-019-00211-8

Keywords

Navigation