Advertisement

Pricing decisions of car aggregation platforms in sharing economy: a developing economy perspective

  • Agam Gupta
  • Biswatosh Saha
  • Parthasarathi Banerjee
Research Article

Abstract

Unlike developed economies, developing economies lack surplus assets that have fueled the growth of sharing economy through various digital platforms. In this research, we build a system dynamics model of a ride sharing platform in a developing country that endogenizes the growth of the platform in the presence of stickiness of the asset provider, since platform growth can occur only through new investments in assets that have limited utility outside the platform. Our modeling approach enables capture of two-sided positive network externalities and the same-side negative externalities together in the same framework. Simulations illustrate that the pricing and incentive decisions taken by the platform to overcome the problem of initial asset unavailability have long-term consequences on various parameters of performance of the platform such as driver’s profits, platform revenues, and the level of prices of services.

Keywords

Ride sharing platforms Pricing and incentives System dynamics Simulation Network effects 

References

  1. Armstrong, M. 2006. Competition in two-sided markets. The Rand Journal of Economics 37 (3): 668–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M., and J. Wright. 2005. Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts. Economic Theory 32 (2): 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardhi, F., and G.M. Eckhardt. 2012. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing: Table 1. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (4): 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlas, Y. 1996. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 12 (3): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cachon, G.P., K.M. Daniels, and R. Lobel. 2017. The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 19 (3): 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caillaud, B., and B. Jullien. 2003. Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics Journal of Economics 34 (2): 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castillo, J.C., Knoepfle, D., and Wyle, G. 2017 Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  8. Choudary, S.P. 2013. Why business models fail: Pipes vs. platforms. Wired. https://www.wired.com/insights/2013/10/why-business-models-fail-pipes-vs-platforms/.
  9. Coyle, G. 1998. The practice of system dynamics: Milestones, lessons and ideas from 30 years experience. System Dynamics Review 14 (4): 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramer, J. and Krueger, A.B. 2015. Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber Judd Cramer and Alan B. Krueger. Princeton: Princeton University.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161002. Accessed 31 Dec 2015.
  11. Einav, L., C. Farronato, and J. Levin. 2015. Peer-to-peer markets. SIEPR Discussion Paper 15 (29): 1–34.Google Scholar
  12. Einav, L., C. Farronato, and J. Levin. 2016. Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Review of Economics 8 (1): 615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, D.S., and R. Schmalensee. 2016. The matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Express, F. 2017. Uber, Ola cab drivers go on three-day strike in Guwahati after income plunges from Rs 75,000 to Rs 25,000 p.m., Financial Express. http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/uber-ola-cab-drivers-go-on-three-day-strike-in-guwahati-after-income-plunges-from-rs-75000-to-rs-25000-p-m/691080/. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.
  15. Fang, Z., Huang, L. and Wierman, A. 2016. Prices and subsidies in the sharing economy http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01627.
  16. Forrester, J.W. 1996. Industrial dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communication.Google Scholar
  17. Gurvich, I., Lariviere, M. and Moreno, A. 2016. Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Ssrn, p. 27.Google Scholar
  18. Hagiu, A. 2009. Two-sided platforms : Product variety and pricing structures. Journal of Economic and Management Strategy 18 (4): 1011–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, J., Kendrick, C. and Nosko, C. 2015. The effects of uber’ s surge pricing: A case study, mimeo.Google Scholar
  20. Hinterhuber, A. 2004. Towards value-based pricing: An integrative framework for decision making. Industrial Marketing Management 33 (8): 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacob, J. and Roet-green, R. 2017. Ride solo or pool: The impact of sharing on optimal pricing of ride-sharing services.Google Scholar
  22. Paul, B. 2017. Ola, Uber drivers go on strike in Bangalore as talks fail; one attempts suicide. Tech Circle. http://techcircle.vccircle.com/2017/02/16/ola-uber-drivers-go-on-strike-in-bangalore-as-talks-fail-one-attempts-suicide/. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.
  23. Raysman, M. 2009. The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (3): 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richardson, G.P. 1996. Modeling for management. Dartmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  25. Rifkin, J. 2016. Market share. RSA (Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) Journal. f//medium.com/rsa-journal/market-share-8f028c7abcc7#.ml7z37v6u.
  26. Rochet, J., and J. Tirole. 2003. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4): 990–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rochet, J., and J. Tirole. 2006. Two-sided markets: A progress report. The Rand Journal of Economics 37 (3): 645–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Senge, P.M., and J.W. Forrester. 1980. Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. System Dynamics, TIMS Studies in Management Sciences 14: 209–228.Google Scholar
  29. Shah, A. 2017. Uber reviews India leasing scheme as driver incomes drop. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-tech-india-analysis-idUSKBN16V04Z.
  30. Sundararajan, A. 2016. The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. https://books.google.com/books?id=F-iEjgEACAAJ&pgis=1.
  31. Vlachos, D., P. Georgiadis, and E. Iakovou. 2007. A system dynamics model for dynamic capacity planning of remanufacturing in closed-loop supply chains. Computers & Operations Research 34 (2): 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agam Gupta
    • 1
  • Biswatosh Saha
    • 2
  • Parthasarathi Banerjee
    • 3
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management RohtakRohtakIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Management CalcuttaKolkataIndia
  3. 3.International Management Institute (IMI)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations