Skip to main content
Log in

Equilibrium analysis in multi-echelon supply chain with multi-dimensional utilities of inertial players

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

In a supply chain, the importance of information elicitation from the supply chain players is vital to design supply chain network. The rationality and self-centredness of these players causes the information asymmetry in the supply chain and thus situation of conflict and non-participation of the players in the network design process. In such situations, it is required to analyse the supply chain players’ behaviour in order to explore potential for coordination through incentives. In this paper, a novel approach of social utility analysis is proposed to elicit the information for supply chain coordination among the supply chain players in a dyadic relationship – supplier and buyer. In principal, we consider a monopsony situation where buyer is a dominant player. With the objective of maximizing the social utility, efforts have been made to value behavioural issues in supply chain. On the other hand, the reluctance of player due to the information asymmetry is measured in the form of inertia – an offset to the supply chain profit. The suppliers’ behaviour is analysed with three distinct level of risk for two types of the product in procurement process. The useful insight from this paper is in supplier selection process where the reluctance of supplier offsets supply chain profit. The paper provides recommendations to supply chain managers for efficient decision-making ability in supplier selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beil, D.R. and Wein, L.M. (2003) An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Science 49(11): 1529–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. and Swinney, R. (2009) Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Science 55(3): 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che, Y. (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 24:668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, W.Y.K., Chhajed, D., Hess, J.D. (2003) Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management Science 49(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S.H., McCardle, K.F., Tang, C.S. (2009) Optimal pricing and rebate strategies in a two-level supply chain. Production and Operations Management 18(4): 426–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., Prasad, A. and Sethi, S.P. (2009) Cooperative advertising and pricing in a dynamic stochastic supply chain: Feedback Stackelberg strategies. Production and Operations Management 18(1): 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B.F. and Pang, J.S. (2007) Nash-Cournot equilibria in electric power markets with piecewise linear demand functions and joint constraints. Operations Research 55(1): 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Q., Schwarz, L.B. and Uhan, N.A. (2012) The impact of group purchasing organizations on healthcare-product supply chains. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 14(1): 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, V. and Deshmukh, S.G. (2009) Dynamic supply chain modeling using a new fuzzy hybrid negotiation mechanism. International Journal of Production Economics 122(1): 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, V., Panchal, G.B. and Kumar, S. (2014) Universal supplier selection via multi-dimensional auction mechanisms for two-way competition in oligopoly market of supply chain. Omega 47(0): 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, V., Wadhwa, S. and Deshmukh, S.G. (2009) Select supplier-related issues in modelling a dynamic supply chain: potential, challenges and direction for future research. International Journal of Production Research 47(11): 3013–3039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, K. and Tapiero, C.S. (2007) Supply Chain Games: Operations Management and Risk Valuation. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J. and Martimort, D. (2009) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.W., Chiang, M. and Calderbank, A.R. (2006) Price-based distributed algorithms for rate-reliability tradeoff in network utility maximization. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24(5): 962–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Y., McGill, J. and Nediak, M. (2009) Dynamic pricing in the presence of strategic consumers and oligopolistic competition. Management Science 55(1): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and Graves, S.C. (2012) Pricing decisions during inter-generational product transition. Production and Operations Management 21(1): 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D. and Green, J.R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narahari, Y. and Srivastava, N.K. (2007) A Bayesian incentive compatible mechanism for decentralized supply chain formation, The 9th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the 4th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce, and E-Services, 2007. CEC/EEE 2007, pp. 315–322.

  • Niyato, D. and Hossain, E. (2007) A game-theoretic approach to competitive spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007. WCNC 2007. IEEE, pp. 16–20.

  • Ovchinnikov, A. and Milner, J.M. (2012) Revenue management with end-of-period discounts in the presence of customer learning. Production and Operations Management 21(1): 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal, G. and Jain, V. (2011a) Multi-dimensional analysis of utilities in pricing game, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI), pp. 359–363.

  • Panchal, G. and Jain, V. (2011b) A review on select models for supply chain formation. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling 3(2): 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal, G.B., Jain, V. and Kumar, S. (2015) Multidimensional utility analysis in a two-tier supply chain. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 37(1): 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, D.C. and Kalagnanam, J. (2005) Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Science 51(3): 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, G., Roma, P. and Lo Nigro, G. (2010) Designing multi-attribute auctions for engineering services procurement in new product development in the automotive context. International Journal of Production Economics 124(1): 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2005) Pricing and Revenue Optimization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, G., Liu, W. and Bell, D. (2007) Combining multiple prioritized knowledge bases by negotiation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158(23): 2535–2551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C., Zhao, Y. and Ma, S. (2012) Procurement decision making mechanism of divisible goods based on multi-attribute auction. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11(4): 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.K., Sun, D. and Zhao, X. (2012) Coordinating a supply chain with a manufacturer-owned online channel: A dual channel model under price competition. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60(2): 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, X. (2009) A model of consumer inertia with applications to dynamic pricing. Production and Operations Management 18(4): 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A.A. and Agrawal, N. (2004) Channel conflict and coordination in the E-commerce age. Production and Operations Management 13(1): 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W. and Wellman, M. (2000) Modeling supply chain formation in multiagent systems. International Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electonic Commerce. Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce II, pp. 94–101.

  • Wang, H. (2013) Contingent payment auction mechanism in multidimensional procurement auctions. European Journal of Operational Research 224(2): 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2007) Contract, mechanism design, and technological detail. Econometrica 75(1): 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Desai, A. (1998) Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1): 208–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, M.P., Walsh, W.E., Wurman, P.R. and MacKie-Mason, J.K. (2001) Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. Games and Economic Behavior 35(1–2): 271–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurman, P.R. and Wellman, M.P. (1999) Equilibrium prices in bundle auctions, Proc. AAAI-99 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce, pp. 56–61.

  • Zhao, L., Tian, P. and Li, X. (2012) Dynamic pricing in the presence of consumer inertia. Omega 40(2): 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zschocke, M.S., Mantin, B. and Jewkes, E. (2012) Competitive market selection with timing and capacity decisions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60(1): 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vipul Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panchal, G., Jain, V., Cheikhrouhou, N. et al. Equilibrium analysis in multi-echelon supply chain with multi-dimensional utilities of inertial players. J Revenue Pricing Manag 16, 417–436 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-017-0094-0

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-017-0094-0

Keywords

Navigation