Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 40–55 | Cite as

Price fairness and PWYW (pay what you want): a behavioral economics perspective

  • Jin Young Chung
Research Article


This study proposes a conceptual framework to clarify what leads to successful implementation of the pay what you want (PWYW) pricing mechanism. Psychological factors from the behavioral economics perspective are included in the framework based on the proposition that they play a role in determining how much a consumer will pay. PWYW refers to a participative pricing model in which a consumer can take full control over the price. The goals of this value-based pricing strategy are in line with the goals of revenue management—increasing the opportunity for greater revenues and higher customer satisfaction by understanding consumers’ perceived value. A meta-analysis of real-world examples identifies components, including price fairness perception that can lead people to pay something greater than zero under PWYW.


behavioral economics service industry participative pricing price fairness pay what you want (PWYW) value-based pricing 


  1. Adams, J.S. (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, pp. 267–299.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., Rosenthal, L.H. and Brown, T.C. (2000) Effects of perceived fairness on willingness to pay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30(12): 2439–2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreoni, J. (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. The Journal of Political Economy 97(6): 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodner, R. and Prelec, D. (1995) The diagnostic value of actions and the emergence of personal rules in a self-signaling model. In R. Bodner (ed.) Self-knowledge and the diagnostic value of one’s actions, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
  5. Bodner, R. and Prelec, D. (2003) Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. The Psychology of Economic Decisions 1: 105–126.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, M.C. (1999) Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research 36(2): 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, R.E. and Curry, D.J. (2010) Transparent pricing: theory, tests, and implications for marketing practice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38(6): 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung, J.Y. and Petrick, J.F. (2013) Price fairness of airline ancillary fees: An attributional approach. Journal of Travel Research 52(2): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung, J.Y. and Petrick, J.F. (2015) Measuring price fairness: Development of a multidimensional scale. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 32(7): 907–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cialdini, R.B., Demaine, L.J., Sagarin, B.J., Barrett, D.W., Rhoads, K. and Winter, P.L. (2006) Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social influence 1(1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cialdini, R.B. and Goldstein, N.J. (2002) The science and practice of persuasion. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 43(2): 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, K.S. and Hegtvedt, K.A. (1983) Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology 9(1): 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics: 817–868.Google Scholar
  14. Fiske, A.P. (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99(4): 689–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson, J.J. (1977) The Theory of affordances. In R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson, J.J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  17. Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L.D. and Brown, A. (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989): 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G. and Nelson, L.D. (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(19): 7236–7240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, J. (1983) Self-image versus impressional management in adherence to distributive justice standards: The influence of self-awareness and self-consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haws, K. L. and Bearden, W.O. (2006) Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research 33: 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes, D.K. and Miller, A.A. (2011) Revenue management for the hospitality industry. River Street Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Hinterhuber, A. and Liozu, S. (2012) Is it time to rethink your pricing strategy? MIT Sloan Management Review 53(4): 69–77.Google Scholar
  23. Jang, H. and Chu, W. (2012) Are consumers acting fairly toward companies? An examination of pay-what-you-want pricing. Journal of Macromarketing 32(4): 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R. (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review 76(4): 728–741.Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39(4): 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009) Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing 73(1): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kimes, S.E. (2003) Revenue management: A retrospective. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 44(5–6): 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kreps, D.M. and Wilson, R. (1982) Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory 27(2): 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kyle, G., Graefe, A.R. and Absher, J.D. (2002) Determining appropriate prices for recreation on public lands. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 20(2): 69–89.Google Scholar
  31. Laarman, J.G. and Gregersen, H.M. (1996) Pricing policy in nature-based tourism. Tourism Management 17(4): 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. León, F.J., Noguera, J.A. and Tena-Sánchez, J. (2012) How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato. Social Science Information 51(3): 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L. and Gaeth, G.J. (1998) All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 76(2): 149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liozu, S.M., Hinterhuber, A., Boland, R. and Perelli, S. (2012) The conceptualization of value-based pricing in industrial firms. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management 11(1): 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mak, V., Zwick, R., Rao, A.R. and Pattaratanakun, J.A. (2015) “Pay what you want” as threshold public good provision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 127: 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maxwell, S. (2008) The price is wrong: Understanding what makes a price seem fair and the true cost of unfair pricing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. McCarville, R.E. and Crompton, J. (1987) An empirical investigation of the influence of information on reference prices for public swimming goods. Journal of Leisure Research 19: 223–235.Google Scholar
  38. McGraw, A.P., Tetlock, P.E. and Kristel, O.V. (2003) The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. Journal of Consumer Research 30(2): 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petrick, J.F. (1999) An examination of the relationship between golf travelers’ satisfaction, perceived value, loyalty, and intentions to revisit. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Clemson, SC: Clemson University.Google Scholar
  40. Petrick, J.F. (2002) Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service. Journal of Leisure Research 34(2): 119–134.Google Scholar
  41. Petrick, J.F. (2004) The roles of quality, value, and satisfaction in predicting cruise passengers’ behavioral intentions. Journal of Travel Research 42: 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rabin, M. (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review 83(5): 1281–1302.Google Scholar
  43. Regner, T. and Barria, J.A. (2009) Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71(2): 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riener, G. and Traxler, C. (2012) Norms, moods, and free lunch: Longitudinal evidence on payments from a Pay-What-You-Want restaurant. The Journal of Socio-Economics 41(4): 476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt, K.M., Spann, M. and Zeithammer, R. (2015) Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets. Management Science 61(6): 1217–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: The gentle power of choice architecture. New Haven, Conn.: Yale.Google Scholar
  47. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1123–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481): 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaidyanathan, R. and Aggarwal, P. (2003) Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research 56: 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wirtz, J. and Kimes, S.E. (2007) The moderating role of familiarity in fairness perceptions of revenue management pricing. Journal of Service Research 9(3): 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xia, L., Monroe, K.B. and Cox, J.L. (2004) The price is unfair! a conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing 68(4): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeithaml, V.A. (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(July): 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing 60(April): 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Incheon National UniversityIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations