Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding changes in a brand’s core positioning and customer engagement: a sentiment analysis of a brand-owned Facebook site

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marketing Analytics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing power of social media has created unprecedented opportunities for marketers. In particular, brand-owned social media seems to be an increasingly popular way of enhancing a brand’s position, connecting with customers, and improving customer engagement with the brand. To guide strategic marketing communication decision-making on social media, the current study extends the relationship communication model and offers an analytical workflow to gain new insights from unstructured textual data available on brand-owned social media. The workflow utilizes an eclectic mix of analytical tools such as word clouds, and cluster and word association analyses, which collectively allow for identification of main topics and their temporal evolution in unstructured textual data from a brand’s social media. In doing so, the proposed workflow offers researchers and practitioners a step by step procedure to make sense of such textual data, which may prove unwieldy and overwhelming otherwise. Furthermore, to manifest the utility of the proposed workflow, it is applied to illustrative data collected from a brand’s Facebook page. Results from this example analysis point to a slight fading of the brand’s perceived core position as an event avenue, as well as an evolution of customer sentiments that may reflect different levels and types of customer engagement with the page. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for research and brand management practice, as well as the study’s limitations and future research opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ågerfalk, P.J. 2014. Insufficient theoretical contribution: a conclusive rationale for rejection? European Journal of Information Systems 23 (6): 593–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarella, C.V., T.F. Wagner, J.H. Kietzmann, and I.P. McCarthy. 2018. Social media? It’s serious! Understanding the dark side of social media. European Management Journal 36 (4): 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baesens, B., R. Bapna, J.R. Marsden, J. Vanthienen, and J.L. Zhao. 2016. Transformational issues ofbigdataand analytics in networked business. MIS Quarterly 40 (4): 807–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitsohl, J., W.H. Kunz, and D. Dowell. 2015. Does the host match the content? A taxonomical update on online consumption communities. Journal of Marketing Management 31 (9–10): 1040–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukhari, I., C. Wojtalewicz, M. Vorvoreanu, and J.E. Dietz. 2015. Social media use for large event management: The application of social media analytic tools for the Super Bowl, In 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) (pp. 24–29). IEEE.

  • Camiciottoli, B.C., S. Ranfagni, and S. Guercini. 2014. Exploring brand associations: An innovative methodological approach. European Journal of Marketing 48 (5–6): 1092–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T.K., X. Zheng, C.M. Cheung, M.K. Lee, and Z.W. Lee. 2014. Antecedents and consequences of customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Marketing Analytics 2 (2): 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. 1999. Brand management through narrowing the gap between brand identity and brand reputation. Journal of Marketing Management 15 (1–3): 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, Z. 2019. Data rich but insight poor: How companies are missing the point. Customerthink. https://customerthink.com/data-rich-but-insight-poor-how-companies-are-missing-the-point/. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Edelman, D.C. 2010. Branding in the digital age. Harvard Business Review 88 (12): 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., and T. Strandvik. 2000. Is a critical incident critical for a customer relationship? Managing Service Quality 10 (2): 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finne, Å., and C. Grönroos. 2009. Rethinking marketing communication: From integrated marketing communication to relationship communication. Journal of Marketing Communications 15 (2–3): 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finne, Å., and C. Grönroos. 2017. Communication-in-use: customer-integrated marketingcommunication. European Journal of Marketing 51 (3): 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gensler, S., F. Völckner, Y. Liu-Thompkins, and C. Wiertz. 2013. Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing 27 (4): 242–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, D., and O’cass, A. . 2005. Examining the effects of service brand communications on brand evaluation. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510592581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D., M. Petrescu, A. Krishen, and M. Bendixen. 2019. The state of marketing analytics in research and practice. Journal of Marketing Analytics 7 (3): 152–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamensky, J. 2018. Data rich, but information poor. IBM Center for The Business of Government. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/blog/data-rich-information-poor. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Keller, K. L. 2002. Branding and brand equity. Handbook of Marketing, 151.

  • Keller, K.L., and D.R. Lehmann. 2006. Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science 25 (6): 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D.M., and S. Fairley. 2018. The utility of relationships in the creation and maintenance of an event portfolio. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 36 (2): 260–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korfiatis, N., P. Stamolampros, P. Kourouthanassis, and V. Sagiadinos. 2019. Measuring service quality from unstructured data: A topic modeling application on airline passengers’ online reviews. Expert Systems with Applications 116: 472–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, A.S., and M. Petrescu. 2018. Marketing analytics: Delineating the field while welcoming crossover. Journal of Marketing Analytics 6 (4): 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., K. Hosanagar, and H.S. Nair. 2018. Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Science 64 (11): 5105–5131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenka, S., V. Parida, and J. Wincent. 2017. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms. Psychology & Marketing 34 (1): 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A., and I. Crawford. 1999. Implementing, monitoring, and measuring a programme of relationship marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 17 (5): 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. 2012. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 5 (1): 1–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, A., E. Guerra, B. Gonzalez, and S. Madero. 2020. Consumer sentiments toward brands: The interaction effect between brand personality and sentiments on electronic word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Analytics 8 (4): 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maceli, M., 2016. Introduction to text mining with R for information professionals. Code4Lib Journal, 33.

  • Maclaran, P., and M. Catterall. 2002. Researching the social web: Marketing information from virtual communities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 20 (6): 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manaman, H.S., S. Jamali, and A. AleAhmad. 2016. Online reputation measurement of companies based on user-generated content in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior 54: 94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, . 1996. Building brands directly. London: MacMillan Business.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, D., A. Bouchachia, and H. Hellwagner. 2016. Online indexing and clustering of social media data for emergency management. Neurocomputing 172: 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambocas, M., and J. Gama. 2013. The role of sentiment analysis. Working Paper [489], FEPUP, University of Porto, April, available at: http://wps.fep.up.pt/wps/wp489.pdf (accessed in November 2020).

  • Rambocas, M., and B.G. Pacheco. 2018. Online sentiment analysis in marketing research: A review. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 12 (2): 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, B., and E.P.Z. Brito. 2017. The brand meaning co-creation on Facebook. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 35 (7): 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, G. 2009. Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research 19 (1): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, F., and V. Tossan. 2018. Does brand-consumer social sharing matter? A relational framework of customer engagement to brand-owned social media. Journal of Business Research 85: 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., and X. Ye. 2018. Social media analytics for natural disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32 (1): 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., and P.K. Kannan. 2016. Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing 80 (6): 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., H. Murphy, and J.C. Fierro. 2012. Hospitality and travel: The nature and implications of user-generated content. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 53 (3): 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., G.L. Frankwick, and E. Ramirez. 2015. Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: A knowledge fusion perspective. Journal of Business Research 69 (5): 1562–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing & Management, California State University, Bakersfield, USA

    Zhenning Xu

  2. Consumer Deposits Products and Payments (CDPP), TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank, ME2-002-029 | 70 Gray Road, Falmouth, ME, 04105, USA

    Colin Vail

  3. School of Business, University of Southern Maine, P.O. Box 9300, Portland, ME, 04104-9300, USA

    Amarpreet S. Kohli

  4. Indiana University Southeast, Hillside Hall 41A, New Albany, USA

    Saeed Tajdini

Authors
  1. Zhenning Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Colin Vail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amarpreet S. Kohli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saeed Tajdini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenning Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Vail, C., Kohli, A.S. et al. Understanding changes in a brand’s core positioning and customer engagement: a sentiment analysis of a brand-owned Facebook site. J Market Anal 9, 3–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00099-z

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00099-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation