Abstract
Social media played a significant role in past Presidential elections, and it is very likely that this form of communication will continue to influence political campaigns. Can analytics uncover the linguistic “plot arcs” and resulting sentiment or emotion in political text? This paper examines how natural language processing (NLP) and data visualization tools and methods in analytics can play a key role in marketing political candidates. Using publicly available text messages, the authors employ NLP techniques to transform the text observations from the past campaigns of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump into a linguistic “corpus” and story arc visualizations. The methodology includes the use of Syuzhet and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) models. The resulting data visualizations reveal the story arcs associated with the candidate’s communications, and they provide a means to analyze the unbiased political sentiment or hidden emotion in the text. In an analysis of the results, the authors found distinctly different story arcs and vocabulary usage among the three Presidential candidates. The contribution to the literature is a methodology for extracting the story and the resulting sentiment from text messages for marketing campaigns. The authors suggest that the techniques used in this paper can assist future research on marketing other products or services that utilize computer-mediated communications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amit-Danhi, Eedan R., and Limor Shifman. 2018. Digital Political Infographics: A Rhetorical Palette of an Emergent Genre. New Media & Society. Sociology and Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817750565.
Appel, Gil, Lauren Grewal, Thonda Hadi, and Andrew Stephen. 2020. The Future of Social Media in Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marking Science 48: 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1.
Berinato, Scott. 2016. Visualizations That Really Work. Harvard Business Review, June, 92–100. https://hbr.org/2016/06/visualizations-that-really-work. Accessed April 2019.
Bimber, Bruce A., and Richard Davis. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003): 993–1022.
Boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Buccoliero, Luca, Elena Bellio, Giulia Crestini, and Alessandra Arkoudas. 2020. Twitter and Politics: Evidence from the US Presidential Elections. Journal of Marketing Communications 26 (1): 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1504228.
Conger, Kate. 2020. Twitter Says It Labeled 0.2% of all Election-Related Tweets as Disputed. New York Times, 12 Nov. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/12/technology/twitter-says-it-labeled-0-2-of-all-election-related-tweets-as-disputed.html. Accessed 13 Nov 2020.
Coursaris, Constantinos K., Wietske van Osch, and Brandon Brooks. 2014. Social Media Marketing on Twitter. In International Conference on HCI in Business, vol. 8527, 155–165. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_15.
Dang-Xuan, Linh, Stefan Stieglitz, Jennifer Wladarsch, and Christoph Neuberger. 2013. An Investigation of Influentials and the Role of Sentiment in Political Communication on Twitter During Election Periods. Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 795–825.
Davis, Richard. 1999. The Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System. New York: Oxford University Press.
Desjarlais, Malinda, and Jessica J. Joseph. 2017. Socially Interactive and Passive Technologies Enhance Friendship Quality: An Investigation of the Mediating Roles of Online and Offline Self-Disclosure. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 20 (5): 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0363.
Diakopoulos, Nicholas A., and David A. Shamma. 2010. Characterizing Debate Performance via Aggregated Twitter Sentiment. In Association for Computing Machinery. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, 1195–1198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753504.
Erlich, Victor. 1954. Russian Formalism: In Perspective. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (2): 215–225.
Gadde, Vijaya, and Kayvon Beykpour. 2020. An Update on Our Work Around the 2020 US Elections. Twitter, 12 Nov. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/2020-election-update.html. Accessed Nov 2020.
Hamner, Ben. 2016. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Tweets: Tweets from the Major Party Candidates for the 2016 US Presidential Election. kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/benhamner/clinton-trump-tweets. Accessed April 2019.
Hirschberg, Julia, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. Advances in Natural Language Processing. Science 349 (6245): 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8685.
Holt, Richard. 2004. Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-Mediated Communication (Civic Discourse for the Third Millennium). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Horacek, Helmut. 1990. Natural Language Processing. Computer Physics Communications 61 (1–2): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(90)90107-C.
Hutchins, John. 1954. The First Public Demonstration of Machine Translation: The Georgetown-IBM System, 7th January 1954. S2CID 132677.
Kumar, Shamanth, Fred Morstatter, and Huan Liu. 2014. Twitter Data Analytics. New York: Springer.
Liu, S., X. Wang, M. Liu, and J. Zhu. 2017. Towards Better Analysis of Machine Learning Models. Visual Informatics 1 (1): 48–56.
Mohammad, Saif. 2020. NLP Scholar: An Interactive Visual Explorer for Natural Language Processing Literature. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL-2020), July, Seattle, USA. http://saifmohammad.com/WebDocs/NLP-Scholar/ACL2020-NLP-Scholar-Demo.pdf. Accessed Oct 2020.
Ott, Brian. 2017. The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686.
Pagolu, V. S., Challa K. N. R. Reddy, G. Panda, and B. Majhi. 2016. Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data for Predicting Stock Market Movements. In International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES). arXiv:1610.09225 [cs.IR].
Patterson, Dan. 2018. How Data Analytics Has Forever Changed Political Campaigns and Elections. Digital Transformation. March 13. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-data-analytics-has-forever-changed-political-campaigns-and-elections/. Accessed Mar 2020.
Phan, Xuan-Hieu., Cam-Tu. Nguyen, Dieu-Thu. Le, Le-Minh. Nguyen, Susumu Horiguchi, and Quang-Thuy. Ha. 2011. A Hidden Topic-Based Framework Toward Building Applications with Short Web Documents. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23 (7): 961–976.
Rodgers, P., Rob Gaizauskas, K. Humphreys, and H. Cunningham. 1997. Visual Execution and Data Visualization in Natural Language Processing. In Visual Languages, IEEE Symposium, 338. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1997.626602.
Searle, John. 1980. Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756.
Sievert, Carson, and Kenneth Shirley. 2014. LDAvis: A Method for Visualizing and Interpreting Topics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June 27. Association for Computational Linguistics, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1394.3043.
Singer, P.W., and Emerson T. Brooking. 2018. Likewar: The Weaponization of Social Media. Boston: Houghton Miffin Harcourt.
Soboleva, Alena, Suzan Burton, and Aila Khan. 2015. Marketing with Twitter: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Maximizing Commerce and Marketing Strategies through Micro-Blogging. Chapter 1, 1–39. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8408-9.ch001.
Turing, Alan. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.
UMass Amherst. 2020. MALLET. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu/. Accessed Nov 2020.
Wertz, Jia. 2018. Why Sentiment Analysis Could Be Your Best Kept Marketing Secret. Forbes. Forbes Women Contributor. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jiawertz/2018/11/30/why-sentiment-analysis-could-be-your-best-kept-marketing-secret/#27a2b2d12bbe. Accessed Feb 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mathaisel, D.F.X., Comm, C.L. Political marketing with data analytics. J Market Anal 9, 56–64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00097-1
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00097-1