Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Declining transportation funding and need for analytical solutions: dynamics and control of VMT tax

Journal of Marketing Analytics volume 5, pages 131–140 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

There is a growing concern among policy makers and analysts regarding the mismatch between demand and supply of the revenue for improving and maintaining highway infrastructure. One possible solution is to link actual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to the fee structure. The main objective of this paper is to model VMT dynamics and establish a methodology for designing an optimal VMT tax rate. The paper proposes a novel model for VMT dynamics and estimates the model parameters using historical data. An optimal control problem is then formulated by designing a cost function which aims to maximize the generated revenue while keeping the tax rate at a reasonable rate. Using optimal control theory, a solution is provided to this problem. Steady-state analysis of this model is provided and simulations are performed for the 50-year period showing the projected VMT, generated revenue, and the optimal tax rate. The model provides a parameter in the cost function which can be adjusted for achieving a certain amount of revenue in a given time frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  • Anas, A., and R. Lindsey. 2011. Reducing urban road transportation externalities: Road pricing in theory and in practice. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (1): 66–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebon, D. 1999. Handbook of vehicle-road interaction. Routledge: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Palma, A., and R. Lindsey. 2007. Transport user charges and cost recovery. Research in Transportation Economics 19: 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi, M.A. and D.R. McCubbin. 2010. External costs of transport in the us. Institute of Transportation Studies.

  • Ecola, L., and T. Light. 2009. Equity and congestion pricing, 1–45. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fwa, T.F. 2005. The handbook of highway engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., and S.M. Puckett. 2005. Road user charging: The global relevance of recent developments in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy 12 (5): 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn, S., and P.H. Bovy. 2003. Simulation of pedestrian flows by optimal control and differential games. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 24 (3): 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H.-J., and H. Yang. 1999. Optimal utilization of a transport system with auto/transit parallel modes. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 20 (6): 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INRIX. 2013. Economic & environmental impact of traffic congestion in Europe & the U.S. http://www.inrix.com/economic-environment-cost-congestion/. Accessed 20 November 2014

  • Ison, S., and T. Rye. 2005. Implementing road user charging: The lessons learnt from Hong Kong, Cambridge and central London. Transport Reviews 25 (4): 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, N.N., and J.H. Lambert. 2007. Equity metrics with risk, performance, and cost objectives for the prioritization of transportation projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54 (3): 539–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachroo, P., S. Agarwal, and S. Sastry. 2016. Inverse problem for non-viscous mean field control: Example from traffic. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 61 (11): 3412–3421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachroo, P., S. Gupta, S. Agarwal, and K. Ozbay. 2017. Optimal control for congestion pricing: Theory, simulation, and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18 (5): 1234–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D.E. 2012. Optimal control theory: An introduction. Mineola: Courier Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R.S., and W.J. Mallett. 2013. Funding and financing highways and public transportation. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, A.S., and M. Petrescu. 2017. The world of analytics: interdisciplinary, inclusive, insightful, and influential. Journal of Marketing Analytics 5: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, A., R. Raschke, and M. Mejza. 2010. Guidelines for shaping perceptions of fairness of transportation infrastructure policies: The case of a vehicle mileage tax. Transportation Journal 49: 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, A., R. Raschke, P. Kachroo, M. LaTour, and P. Verma. 2014a. Promote me or protect us? The framing of policy for collective good. European Journal of Marketing 48 (3/4): 742–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, A., R.L. Raschke, P. Kachroo, M. Mejza, and A. Khan. 2014b. Interpretation of public feedback to transportation policy. Transportation Journal 53 (1): 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.T. 1987. The control of environmental pollution and optimal investment and employment decisions. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 8 (1): 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, T. (1999). Distance-based charges; a practical strategy for more optimal vehicle pricing. In Transportation Research Board 78th Annual Meeting, No. 99-0678.

  • Mahmoud, M.S., and S.Z. Eid. 1988. Optimization of freeway traffic control problems. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 9 (1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriss, J. and M. Krukar. 1982. A proposal for an axle weight-distance road user charge. In Transportation Research Forum Proceedings, Vol. 23.

  • Morris, J.R. 2006. The fuel tax and alternatives for transportation funding. TR NEWS 245: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, C., B. Matthews, B. Menaz and E. Niskanen. 2003. Charges for heavy goods vehicles: Eu policy and key national developments. In IMPRINTEUROPE Workshop on charges for heavy goods vehicles.

  • NSTIFC. 2009. Paying our own way: A new framework for transportation finance. http://financecommission.dot.gov/ Accessed 10 October 2011

  • NSTPRSC. 2007. Transportation: invest in our future. Surface transportation policy recommendations for the National Surface Transportation Police and Revenue Study Commission, Vol. 2. American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials.

  • Parry, I.W., and K.A. Small. 2005. Does Britain or the United States have the right gasoline tax? The American Economic Review 95 (4): 1276–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrescu, M., and A.S. Krishen. 2017. Marketing analytics: from practice to academia. Journal of Marketing Analytics 5: 45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raschke, R.L., A.S. Krishen, and P. Kachroo. 2014. Understanding the components of information privacy threats for location-based services. Journal of Information Systems 28 (1): 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, W. 2005. Road user charging: Theory and practice. Transport Policy 12 (5): 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selekwa, M.F., R.N. Mussa, and A. Chiteshe. 2003. Application of LQ modelling and optimization in urban traffic control. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 24 (6): 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, J.S., Y. Tjader, and Y. Ding. 2004. A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 (3): 300–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, K.A., C. Winston, and C.A. Evans. 1989. Road work: A new highway pricing and investment policy. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, P.A. and B.D. Taylor. 2005. Review and synthesis of road-use metering and charging systems. In: Report Commissioned by the Committee for the Study of the Long-Term Viability of Fuel Taxes for Transportation Finance, UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies.

  • Souza, F.A., E. Camponogara, W. Kraus, and V.B. Peccin. 2015. Distributed mpc for urban traffic networks: A simulation-based performance analysis. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 36 (3): 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr McMullen, B., L. Zhang, and K. Nakahara. 2010. Distributional impacts of changing from a gasoline tax to a vehicle-mile tax for light vehicles: A case study of Oregon. Transport Policy 17 (6): 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumalee, A., T. May, and S. Shepherd. 2005. Comparison of judgmental and optimal road pricing cordons. Transport Policy 12 (5): 384–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEIA. 2012. Petrolium and other liquids. http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/data.cfm. Accessed 20 November 2012

  • Vasudevan, V., and S. Nambisan. 2013a. A model to estimate passenger vehicle fleet composition, vehicle miles traveled, and fuel consumption. Public Works Management & Policy 18 (1): 56–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, V., and S.S. Nambisan. 2013b. Impacts of energy regulations and vehicular technologies on fuel tax revenues. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 20 (2): 04014007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, P., H. Yang, P. Kachroo, and S. Agarwal. 2016. Modeling and estimation of the vehicle-miles traveled tax rate using stochastic differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 46 (6): 818–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, M. 2003. A dozen reasons for gasoline taxes. Public Works Management & Policy 7 (4): 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, M. 2005. Improving efficiency and equity in transportation finance. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, J.M. and B. Imholt. 2007. Oregon’s mileage fee concept and road user fee pilot program. Oregon Department of Transportation.

  • Winston, C. 1991. Efficient transportation infrastructure policy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Pratik Verma & Pushkin Kachroo

  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, California State University, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Shaurya Agarwal

  3. Department of Marketing & International Business, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, CA, USA

    Anjala Krishen

Authors
  1. Pratik Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaurya Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pushkin Kachroo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anjala Krishen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaurya Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, P., Agarwal, S., Kachroo, P. et al. Declining transportation funding and need for analytical solutions: dynamics and control of VMT tax. J Market Anal 5, 131–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-017-0025-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-017-0025-3

Search

Navigation