Skip to main content
Log in

Place resentment in ‘the places that don’t matter’: explaining the geographic divide in populist and anti-immigration attitudes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tests a novel explanation for geographic divides in populist and anti-immigration attitudes. This explanation centres around place resentment: the feeling that one’s area is ignored by policy makers and that members of one’s local community are misunderstood and disrespected by inhabitants of other areas. I argue that place resentment mediates the relationship between the type of area one inhabits and political attitudes. With representative survey data and contextual data from The Netherlands, I show that place resentment is an important mediator explaining how geographic divides translate into anti-immigration and populist attitudes. Place resentment is a stronger explanation for geographic variation in political attitudes than alternative explanations I explored. The results suggest that place resentment plays a central role in explaining geographic polarization in Western democracies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A public version is available via https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/ui/datasets/id/easy-dataset:161510/tab/2.

  2. See https://osf.io/a764w/?view_only=7882d07889b44be3b7b06cdaa70c4a0a.

  3. The explained variance in Model 2c (R2 = .285) is higher than in Model 2b (R2 = .122).

  4. The explained variance in Model 3d (R2 = .414) is higher than in Model 3b (R2 = .325).

  5. The explained variance in Model 3e (R2 = .330) is similar to Model 3b (R2 = .325).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Eelco Harteveld, Sarah de Lange, Wouter van der Brug and Bram Lancee for their valuable feedback and their support.

Funding

This work was supported by the Amsterdam Centre for Inequality Studies (AMCIS), PO Box 15508, 1001 NB Amsterdam, the Netherlands, amcis@uva.nl.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Twan Huijsmans.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author hereby declares that he has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 11157 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huijsmans, T. Place resentment in ‘the places that don’t matter’: explaining the geographic divide in populist and anti-immigration attitudes. Acta Polit 58, 285–305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00244-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00244-9

Keywords

Navigation