Advertisement

How fractionalisation and polarisation explain the level of government turn-over

  • Simon Otjes
Original Article

Abstract

This article seeks to explain to what extent government composition changes in cabinet formations: it examines why some party systems tend to see wholesale turn-over (where all government parties were previously in opposition) and others only see partial turn-over (where some of the government parties were previously in government). This distinction has been described by many prominent political scientists. Yet there is limited research into the underlying causes. This article examines the importance of both party system characteristics and conditions specific to the cabinet formation: it finds that specifically the interaction between number of parties in a party system and their distribution over the political space matters for the level of party turn-over in government.

Keywords

Party systems Wholesale turn-over Partial turn-over Left–right politics Polarisation 

References

  1. Angelova, M.H. Bäck, W.C. Müller, and D. Strobl. 2017. Veto Player Theory and Reform Making in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research published online ahead of print.Google Scholar
  2. Anthonsen, M., and J. Lindvall. 2009. Party Competition and the Resilience of Corporatism. Government and Opposition 44 (2): 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, R., C. De Vries, E. Edwards, L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, G. Marks, J. Polk, J. Rovny, M. Steenbergen, and M. Vachudova. 2015. Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File 1999–2010. Party Politics 21 (1): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bale, T. 2003. Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and The Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party System. West European Politics 26 (3): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benoit, K., and M. Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Buis, M.L., N.J. Cox, and S.P. Jenkins. 2011. Betafit.Google Scholar
  7. Casal Bértoa, F., and Z. Enyedi. 2014. Party System Closure and Openness: Conceptualization, Operationalization and Validation. Party Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549340.Google Scholar
  8. Castles, F.G., and P. Mair. 1984. Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgments. European Journal of Political Research 12 (1): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheibub, J.A., J. Gandhi, and J.R. Vreeland. 2009. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143 (1–2): 67–101.Google Scholar
  10. Dalton, R.J. 2008. The Quantity and Quality of Party Systems. Party System Polarization, its Measurement, and its Consequences. Comparative Political Studies 41 (7): 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Giorgi, E., and F. Marangoni. 2015. Government Laws and Opposition Parties’ Behaviour in Parliament. Acta Politica 50: 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Swaan, A. 1973. Coalition Theories and Coalition Formations. PhD-thesis: University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Döring, H., and P. Manow. 2016. Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov). An Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Parties, Elections and Governments in Modern Democracies.Google Scholar
  14. Dumont, P., L. De Winter, and R.B. Andeweg. 2011. From Coalition Theory to Coalition Puzzles. In Puzzles of Government Formation. Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases, eds. Andeweg, R.B., De Winter, L. and Dumont, P., 1–15, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Green-Pedersen, C. 2002. The Politics of Justification. Party Competition and Welfare-State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1988. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green-Pedersen, C. 2004. The Implosion of Party Systems: A Study of Centripetal Tendencies in Multiparty Systems. Political Studies 52 (2): 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hooghe, L., R. Bakker, A. Brigevich, C. De Vries, E. Edwards, G. Marks, J. Rovny, M. Steenbergen, and M. Vachudova. 2010. Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research 49 (4): 684–703.Google Scholar
  18. Huber, J., and R. Inglehart. 1995. Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies. Party Politics 1 (1): 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ieraci, G. 2012. Government Alternation and Patterns of Competition in Europe: Comparative Data in Search of Explanations. West European Politics 35 (3): 530–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaiser, A., M. Lehnert, B. Miller, and U. Sieberer. 2002. The Democratic Quality of Institutional Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Political Studies 50 (2): 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laver, M. 1998. Models of Government Formation. Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laver, M., and N. Schofield. 1990. Multiparty Government. The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. ‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leiserson, M.A. 1966. Coalitions in Politics: A Theoretical and Empirical Study. PhD-thesis, New Haven, Yale University.Google Scholar
  25. Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Louwerse, T., S. Otjes, D.M. Willumsen, and P. Öhberg. 2016. Reaching Across the Aisle Explaining Government–Opposition Voting in Parliament. Party Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815626000.Google Scholar
  27. Lundell, K. 2011. Accountability and Patterns of Alternation in Pluralitarian, Majoritarian and Consensus Democracies. Government and Opposition 46 (2): 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mair, P. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mair, P. 2001. The Green Challenge and Political Competition: How Typical is the German Experience? German Politics 10 (2): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mair, P. 2008. Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective. Acta Politica 43 (2–3): 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, L.W., and R.T. Stevenson. 2001. Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer-Sahling, J.H., and T. Veen. 2012. Governing the Post-communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics 28 (1): 4–22.Google Scholar
  33. Otjes, S., and A. Rasmussen. 2015. Collaboration Between Interest Groups and Political Parties in Multi-party Democracies: Party System Dynamics and the Effect of Power and Ideology. Party Politics, online first..  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814568046.Google Scholar
  34. Pedersen, M.N. 1979. Electoral Volatility in Western Europe, 1948-1977. European Journal of Political Research 7 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  36. Rose, R., and T.T. Mackie. 1983. Incumbency in Government: Asset or Liability? In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. H. Daalder and P. Mair, 115–137. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Steenbergen, M., and G. Marks. 2007. Evaluating Expert Judgments. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strøm, K. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Strøm, K., and T. Bergman. 2011. Parliamentary Democracy under Siege. In The Madisonian Turn, ed. T. Bergman and K. Strøm, 3–35. Political Parties and Parliamentary Democracy in Nordic Europe: University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsebelis, G., and E.C. Chang. 2002. Veto Players and the Structure of Budgets in Advanced Industrialized Countries. European Journal of Political Research 43 (3): 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verzichelli, L., and M. Cotta. 1999. Italy: From ‘Constrained’ Coalitions to Alternating Governments? In Coalition Governments in Western Europe, ed. S. Müller and K. Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Zucchini, F. 2010. Government Alternation and Legislative Agenda Setting. European Journal of Political Research 50 (6): 749–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Groningen UniversityGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations