Fostering institutionalisation? The impact of the EU accession process on state–civil society relations in Serbia
- 56 Downloads
In the framework of its enlargement policy, the EU has placed considerable emphasis on supporting civil society organisations (CSOs) both as domestic drivers of change and as a means to foster new, more participatory modes of governance. Our research examines the impact of the EU accession process on state–civil society relations in the Western Balkans and assesses the extent to which new forms of interaction are becoming institutionalised. Comparing minority rights and environmental regulation in Serbia, we find that enlargement negotiations lead to increased dialogue and more formalised interactions between government and CSOs. However, the institutionalisation of state–CSO cooperation remains partial and is hampered by a lack of political will. Whereas civil servants are generally open to civil society input, political officials frequently resort to façade cooperation in response to external pressures. We conclude that the emerging governance model is nothing like the ‘double weakness’ or agency capture found in earlier studies, but instead consists of strong hierarchy and a narrow group of highly professional CSOs engaged at the margins.
KeywordsCivil society organisation Environment Institutionalisation Minority rights Serbia
The authors would like to thank their interview partners in Belgrade for their time and gratefully acknowledge the constructive feedback from two anonymous reviewers.
- Anđelković, B., and L. Gojgić. 2014. EU Civil Society Facility Serbia Programme 2011–2013. http://civilnodrustvo.gov.rs/upload/documents/Kancelarija/EU_IPA/English/EU%20Civil%20Society%20Facility%20Programm%202011-2013.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2017.
- Balkan Civil Society Development Network. 2016. Monitoring Matrix: Country Report for Serbia 2016. http://monitoringmatrix.net/m-m-reports-coded/civil-society-development-in-serbia-2016/. Accessed 17 June 2017.
- Belgrade Centre for Human Rights. 2016. Study on the Legal Framework for National Councils of National Minorities: Focus on Co-operation and Communication Tools. Belgrade, December.Google Scholar
- Bobić, M., and R. Božić. 2012. Civil Society in the Process of European Integration—from Constructive Dialogue to Successful Negotiations. Belgrade: European Movement in Serbia.Google Scholar
- Bojičić-Dželilović, V., J. Ker-Lindsay, and D. Kostovicova. 2013. Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Börzel, T.A., and Y. Pamuk. 2011. Europeanization Subverted? The European Union’s Promotion of Good Governance and the Fight against Corruption in the Southern Caucasus. KFG Working Paper Series April(26).Google Scholar
- Della Porta, D., and M. Diani. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Elbasani, A. 2013. Europeanization Travels to the Western Balkans: Enlargement Strategy, Domestic Obstacles and Diverging Reforms. In European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual?, ed. A. Elbasani, 3–21. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Elek, B., L. Ubović, and T. Zornaczuk. 2015. Civil Society Networks in the EU Integration of Serbia. Warsaw: Polish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2013. Guidelines for EU Support to Civil Society in Enlargement Countries, 2014–2020. http://www.tacso.org/doc/doc_guidelines_cs_support.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2017.
- European Commission. 2014. Serbia 2014 Progress Report: SWD(2014) 302 Final. Brussels.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2015. Serbia 2015 Report: SWD(2015) 211 Final. Brussels.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2016. Serbia Report 2016: SWD(2016) 361 Final. Brussels.Google Scholar
- Government of Serbia. 2014. Smernice za ukǉučivanje organizacija civilnog društva u proces donošenja propisa. Belgrade, 26 August. https://civilnodrustvo.gov.rs/upload/old_site/2012/10/SR-smernice.pdf.
- Government Office for Cooperation with Civil Society. 2015. Baseline Study for the Development of the first National Strategy for Creating an Enabling Environment for Civil Society Development in the Republic of Serbia 2015–2019. Belgrade. https://www.civilnodrustvo.gov.rs/upload/documents/Kancelarija/EU_IPA/English/Cooperation%20of%20State%20Administration%20and%20CSOs%20-%20Baseline%20study.pdf.
- Keil, S., and Z. Arkan. 2014. The EU and Member State Building: European Foreign Policy in the Western Balkans. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Langbein, J. 2015. Transnationalization and Regulatory Change in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Ukraine Between Brussels and Moscow. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Raik, K. 2006. The Ambivalent Impact of Accession on Civil Society: The Case of Estonia. In Das Erbe des Beitritts: Europäisierung in Mittel- und Osteuropa, ed. A. Kutter, and V. Trappmann, 317–338. Nomos: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
- Rosenau, J.N. 1995. Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance 1 (1): 13–43.Google Scholar
- Velat, D. 2013. Civil Society Advocacy Initiative Legacy 2006-2013. Belgrade: Civic Initiatives/USAID. January.Google Scholar
- Vidačak, I., and M. Škrabalo. 2014. Exploring the Effects of Europeanization on the Openness of Public Administration in Croatia. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14 (1): 149–187.Google Scholar
- Wunsch, N. 2018. EU Enlargement and Civil Society in the Western Balkans: From Mobilisation to Empowerment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar