Alonso, S., and S.C.D. Fonseca. 2012. Immigration, Left and Right. Party Politics 18: 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810393265.
Article
Google Scholar
Andall, J. 2007. Introduction: Immigration and Political Parties in Europe. Patterns Prejudice 41: 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220701265478.
Article
Google Scholar
Bale, T. 2003. Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party Systems. West European Politics 26: 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280598.
Article
Google Scholar
Bale, T., C. Green-Pedersen, A. Krouwel, K.R. Luther, and N. Sitter. 2010. If you can’t Beat them, Join them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies 58: 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00783.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R., S.L.D. Boef, and A.E. Boydstun. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R., and B.D. Jones. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Benoit, K., and M. Laver. 2012. The Dimensionality of Political Space: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations. European Union Politics 13: 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511434618.
Article
Google Scholar
Berkhout, J., D. Ruedin, W. Van Der Brug, and G. D’Amato. 2015. Research Design. In The Politicisation of Migration, ed. W. van der Brug, G. D’Amato, D. Ruedin, and J. Berkhout, 19–31. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Berkhout, J., Sudulich, M.L. 2011. Codebook for Political Claims Analysis (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1990221). Social Science Research Network, Rochester.
Budge, I., and D. Farlie. 1983. Party Competition: Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data’. West European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, 267–305. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Carter, N., R. Ladrech, C. Little, and V. Tsagkroni. 2017. Political Parties and Climate Policy: A New Approach to Measuring Parties’ Climate Policy Preferences. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817697630.
Google Scholar
Castelli Gattinara, P. 2016. The Politics of Migration in Italy: Perspectives on Local Debates and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Caviedes, A. 2015. An Emerging ‘European’ News Portrayal of Immigration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41: 897–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.1002199.
Article
Google Scholar
De Sio, L. 2010. Beyond “Position” and “Valence”. A Unified Framework for the Analysis of Political Issues (Working Paper).
Esser, F., and J. Matthes. 2013. Mediatization Effects on Political News, Political Actors, Political Decisions, and Political Audiences. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, 177–201. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Ghanem, S. 1997. Filling in the Tapestry: The Second Level of Agenda-setting. Communication and Democracy, 3–14. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C., and P.B. Mortensen. 2010. Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to it in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting. European Journal of Political Research 49: 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Guinaudeau, I., and S. Persico. 2014. What is Issue Competition? Conflict, Consensus and Issue Ownership in Party Competition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24: 312–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2013.858344.
Article
Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J., and M.J. Hiscox. 2007. Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. International Organization 61: 399–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070142.
Article
Google Scholar
Helbling, M. 2014. Framing Immigration in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40: 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.830888.
Article
Google Scholar
Helbling, M., D. Hoeglinger, and B. Wüest. 2010. How Political Parties Frame European Integration. European Journal of Political Research 49: 495–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01908.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Hobolt, S.B., Klemmensen, R. 2008. The Dynamics of Issue Diversity in Party Rhetoric (Working Paper OCSID), The Politics of Change Workshop, Amsterdam.
Höglinger, D., B. Wuest, and M. Helbling. 2012. Culture versus Economy: The Framing of Public Debates over Issues Related to Globalization. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Kiousis, S., M. Mitrook, X. Wu, and T. Seltzer. 2006. First- and Second-Level Agenda-Building and Agenda-Setting Effects: Exploring the Linkages Among Candidate News Releases, Media Coverage, and Public Opinion During the 2002 Florida Gubernatorial Election. Journal of Public Relations Research 18: 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1803_4.
Article
Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., and A.J. McGann. 1997. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Detroit: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Koopmans, R., Statham, P. 1999. Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 4, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756.
Koopmans, R., P. Statham, M. Giugni, and F. Passy. 2005. Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (ed.). 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., L. Bernhard, and R. Hänggli. 2009. The Politics of Campaigning – Dimensions of Strategic Action. Politik in Der Mediendemokratie, 345–365. New York: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Lahav, G. 2004. Immigration and Politics in the New Europe: Reinventing Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
López-Escobar, E., J.P. Llamas, and M. McCombs. 1998. Agenda Setting and Community Consensus: First and Second Level Effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10: 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.4.335.
Article
Google Scholar
McCombs, M., and S. Ghanem. 2001. The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing. Framing Public Life: Perspectives and Our Understanding, 67–81. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Meguid, B.M. 2005. Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99: 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701.
Article
Google Scholar
Morales, L., J.-B. Pilet, and D. Ruedin. 2015. The Gap Between Public Preferences and Policies on Immigration: A Comparative Examination of the Effect of Politicisation on Policy Congruence. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41: 1495–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1021598.
Article
Google Scholar
Mudde, C. 2013. The Ideology of the Extreme Right. New York: Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Google Scholar
Odmalm, P. 2014. The Party Politics of the EU and Immigration. Berlin: Springer.
Book
Google Scholar
Odmalm, P., and T. Bale. 2014. Immigration into the Mainstream: Conflicting Ideological Streams, Strategic Reasoning and Party Competition. Acta Politica 50: 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.28.
Article
Google Scholar
Odmalm, P., and B. Super. 2014. If the Issue Fits, Stay Put: Cleavage Stability, Issue Compatibility and Drastic Changes on the Immigration ‘Issue’. Comparative European Politics 12: 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.24.
Article
Google Scholar
Petrocik, J.R. 1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850.
Article
Google Scholar
Petrocik, J.R., W.L. Benoit, and G.J. Hansen. 2003. Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly 118: 599–626.
Article
Google Scholar
Roggeband, C., and R. Vliegenthart. 2007. Divergent Framing: The Public Debate on Migration in the Dutch Parliament and Media, 1995–2004. West European Politics 30: 524–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276352.
Article
Google Scholar
Ruedin, D., Morales, L., Ros, V., Sudulich, M.L., Berkhout, J., Cunningham, K., Peintinger, T., Sarah, M. 2012. Comparative Data Set of the Political Opportunity Structure Statistics (Countries and Parties) 1995-2010, Support and Opposition to Migration Project, Swiss Forum for Migration and Population Studies, University of Neuchâtel, 2012. (Harvard Dataverse).
Sniderman, P., and M. Theriault. 2004. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Non-Attitudes, Measurement Error and Change, 133–165. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Tan, Y., and D.H. Weaver. 2007. Agenda-Setting Effects among the Media, the Public, and Congress, 1946–2004. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84: 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400405.
Article
Google Scholar
van der Brug, W., G. D’Amato, D. Ruedin, and J. Berkhout. 2015. The Politicisation of Migration. Abingdon: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Van der Brug, W., and J. Van Spanje. 2009. Immigration, Europe and the ‘New’ Cultural Dimension. European Journal of Political Research 48: 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00841.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, G. 2011. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Book
Google Scholar
Zimmer, M.R., T.F. Stafford, and M.R. Stafford. 1994. Green Issues: Dimensions of Environmental Concern. Special Issue: Linking Theory to Policy. Journal of Business Research 30: 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90069-8.
Article
Google Scholar