Impeding constitutional amendments: why are entrenchment clauses codified in contemporary constitutions?
- 109 Downloads
Almost all contemporary constitutions are entrenched, in other words, harder to amend than ordinary laws. “Entrenchment clauses” further raise these hurdles. They make amendments to certain parts of a constitution or amendments under certain circumstances either more difficult than “normal” amendments or even impossible. Such provisions are common around the world and in all types of political systems. Nevertheless, they are highly controversial from a normative point of view since they may be seen either as adequate means for protecting human rights, democracy, and the rule of law or as illegitimate restrictions on democratic sovereignty. Against this background, this article examines the factors that influence the codification of entrenchment clauses in contemporary constitutions. The study analyzes 210 national constitutions adopted from 1975 until 2015. It focuses on factors describing historical legacies, the political and social context of constitution-making, and characteristics of the newly established constitutional order. As will be shown, the state of democracy has almost no significant influence on the decision for or against entrenchment clauses. Instead, historical path dependencies and contingent procedural decisions on the constitution-making process predetermine that constitutional choice to a large extent.
KeywordsConstitution-making Constitutional politics Democracy Entrenchment clauses Human rights Rule of law
I wish to thank Horst Dreier, Stefan Ewert, Anna Fruhstorfer, Maria Haimerl, Ran Hirschl, Tobias Lenz, Felix Petersen, Theresia Smolka, Toralf Stark, Silvia von Steinsdorff, and Zeynep Yanasmayan for their helpful comments and suggestions, as well as Irina Avdeeva, Lisa Klein, and, in particular, Lisa Klingsporn, for their assistance with data collection. Moreover, I am grateful to Tom Ginsburg and Zachary Elkins for providing me access to the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, which has been the main source for the creation of the dataset used in this article.
- Abat i Ninet, A., and M. Tushnet. 2015. The Arab Spring. An Essay on Revolution and Constitutionalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Anckar, D. 2012. Constitutional Law and Colonial Heritage: Amendment Methods in Former British Colonies. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance 3 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
- Center for Systemic Peace. (2015) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions (1800–2015), http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4v2015.xls. Accessed 6 March 2017.
- Choudhry, S. 2008a. Bridging Comparative Politics and Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutional Design in Divided Societies. In Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?, ed. S. Choudhry, 1–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Choudhry, S. (ed.). 2008b. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dow, D.R. 1995. The Plain Meaning of Article V. In Responding to Imperfection. The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. S. Levinson, 117–144. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Elkins, Z., T. Ginsburg, and J. Melton. 2013. The Content of Authoritarian Constitutions. In Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. T. Ginsburg, and A. Simpser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Elster, J., C. Offe, and U.K. Preuss (eds.). 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Freedom House. (2016) Freedom in the World (1973–2016), https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/freedom_in_the_world_2016_data.zip. Accessed 6 March 2017.
- Fruhstorfer, A., and M. Hein. 2016. Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. From Post-Socialist Transition to the Reform of Political Systems. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gallina, N. 2016. Ukraine. In Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. From Post-Socialist Transition to the Reform of Political Systems, ed. A. Fruhstorfer, and M. Hein, 495–518. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ghai, Y.H. 1988. Constitution Making and Decolonisation. In Law, Politics and Government in the Pacific Island States, ed. Y.H. Ghai, 1–53. Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies of the University of the South Pacific.Google Scholar
- Ginsburg, T., and A. Simpser (eds.). 2013. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Go, J. 2002. Modeling the State: Postcolonial Constitutions in Asia and Africa. Southeast Asian Studies 39 (4): 558–583.Google Scholar
- Goerlich, H. 2008. Concept of Special Protection for Certain Elements and Principles of the Constitution against Amendments and Article 79 (3), Basic Law of Germany. NUJS Law Review 1: 397–415.Google Scholar
- Gözler, K. 2008. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative Study. Bursa: Ekin Press.Google Scholar
- Grote, R., and T.J. Röder. 2016. Constitutionalism, Human Rights, and Islam after the Arab Spring. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Guerra, D.P. 2013. Perfecting the Constitution: The Case for the Article V Amendment Process. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Hathaway, O.A. 2001. Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System. Iowa Law Review 86: 101–165.Google Scholar
- Hein, M. 2013. Verfassungskonflikte zwischen Politik und Recht in Südosteuropa. Bulgarien und Rumänien nach 1989 im Vergleich. Nomos: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
- Hein, M. 2018a. The Constitutional Entrenchment Clauses Dataset. Göttingen: University of Göttingen, http://data.michaelhein.de. Accessed 6 Feb 2018.
- Hein, M. 2018b. Entrenchment Clauses in the History of Modern Constitutionalism. Manuscript under Review. Google Scholar
- Landau, D. 2013. Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review 47 (1): 189–260.Google Scholar
- Ludwikowski, R. 1996. Constitution-Making in the Region of Former Soviet Dominance. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Mazzone, J. 2005. Unamendments. Iowa Law Review 90: 1747–1855.Google Scholar
- Pinelli, C. 2010. State-Building and Constitution-Making: the Cases of Kosovo. Iraq and Afghanistan. Diritto Pubblico 16 (1–2): 299–327.Google Scholar
- Preuss, U.K. 2011. The Implications of “Eternity Clauses”: The German Experience. Israel Law Review 44: 429–448.Google Scholar
- Reuchamps, M., and J. Suiter (eds.). 2016. Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
- Roznai, Y. 2017. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Samuels, K. 2006. Post-Conflict Peace-Building and Constitution-Making. Chicago Journal of International Law 6 (2): 1–20.Google Scholar
- Sobrevilla Perea, N., and S. Eastman (eds.). 2015. The Rise of Constitutional Government in the Iberian Atlantic World. The Impact of the Cádiz Constitution of 1812. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
- Suber, P. 1990. The Paradox of Self-Amendment. A Study of Logic, Law, Omnipotence, and Change. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Topidi, K., and A.H.E. Morawa (eds.). 2010. Constitutional Evolution in Central and Eastern Europe. Expansion and Integration in the EU. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Wheatley, J., and F. Mendez (eds.). 2016. Patterns of Constitutional Design: The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar