Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 177–195 | Cite as

United in diversity: examining the diverging attitudes towards the European Union on the ideological fringes

  • Andreas FagerholmEmail author
Original Article
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

Despite their partial move towards the political mainstream, radical right and radical left parties are still habitually considered as ardently sceptical towards European Union. Recent scholarship has, however, observed that the nature of radical right and radical left Euroscepticism is not as uniform as previously expected. In this article, I provide support for the argument that both the radical right and the radical left family are, in terms of standpoints towards the European Union, united in diversity; both families include parties with a variety of positions, ranging from hardline Euroscepticism to soft criticism and acceptance. More importantly, the article also examines the possible reasons underlying these differences. Using the policy, office or votes-framework, it provides robust support for the view that radical right and radical left parties’ attitudes towards the current European integration process are shaped by their overall (sociocultural and socioeconomic) policy profiles rather than by office- or vote-seeking incentives.

Keywords

European Union Euroscepticism Radical right Radical left Ideologies Political parties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2017 Swedish Political Science Association (SWEPSA) Annual Conference in Karlstad. I thank the participants of the workshop ‘The European Union and the Challenges of a Transforming World Order’ for their comments. I am also grateful to the two anonymous referees for their reviews. The usual disclaimer applies.

Supplementary material

41269_2018_80_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (169 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 169 kb)

References

  1. Adams, J. 2012. Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J., M. Clark, L. Ezrow, and G. Glasgow. 2006. Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkerman, T. 2012. Comparing radical right parties in government: Immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996–2010). West European Politics 35 (3): 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akkerman, T. 2016. Conclusions. In Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream?, ed. T. Akkerman, S.L. de Lange, and M. Rooduijn, 268–282. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akkerman, T., S.L. de Lange, and M. Rooduijn (eds.). 2016. Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream?. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Akkerman, T., and M. Rooduijn. 2015. Pariahs or partners? Inclusion and exclusion of radical right parties and the effects on their policy positions. Political Studies 63 (5): 1140–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Backes, U. 2010. Political Extremes: A Conceptual History from Antiquity to the Present. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bakker, R., et al. 2015. Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics 21 (1): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bale, T., and R. Dunphy. 2011. In from the cold? Left parties and government involvement since 1989. Comparative European Politics 9 (3): 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berman, S. 2008. Taming extremist parties: Lessons from Europe. Journal of Democracy 19 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Budge, I. 1994. A new spatial theory of party competition: Uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budge, I., L. Ezrow, and M.D. McDonald. 2010. Ideology, party factionalism and policy change: An integrated dynamic theory. British Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 781–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charalambous, G. 2011. All the shades of red: Examining the radical left’s Euroscepticism. Contemporary Politics 17 (3): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, G.W. 1990. Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conti, N., and V. Memoli. 2012. The multi-faceted nature of party-based Euroscepticism. Acta Politica 47 (2): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalton, R.J., D.M. Farrell, and I. McAllister. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Vries, C.E., and E.E. Edwards. 2009. Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics 15 (1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2016) Parliaments and Governments database (ParlGov) [data set, development version]. University of Bremen. http://parlgov.org.
  19. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  20. Dunphy, R. 2004. Contesting Capitalism? Left Parties and European Integration. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dunphy, R. 2007. In search of an identity: Finland’s Left Alliance and the experience of coalition government. Contemporary Politics 13 (1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunphy, R., and T. Bale. 2011. The radical left in coalition government: Towards a comparative measurement of success and failure. Party Politics 17 (4): 488–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission (v.d.) Standard & Special Eurobarometer [various data sets, 1973–2016]. Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. http://gesis.org/eurobarometer-data-service/home.
  24. Ezrow, L., C. De Vries, M. Steenbergen, and E. Edwards. 2011. Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters? Party Politics 17 (3): 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gemenis, K. 2013. What to do (and not to do) with the comparative manifestos project data. Political Studies 61 (S1): 23–43.Google Scholar
  26. Hainsworth, P. 2008. The Extreme Right in Western Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halikiopoulou, D., K. Nanou, and S. Vasilopoulou. 2012. The paradox of nationalism: The common denominator of radical right and radical left Euroscepticism. European Journal of Political Research 51 (4): 504–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heinisch, R., and K. Hauser. 2016. The mainstreaming of the Austrian Freedom Party: The more things change…. In Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream, ed. T. Akkerman, S.L. Lange, and M. Rooduijn, 73–93. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and C.J. Wilson. 2002. Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keith, D. 2018. Opposing Europe, opposing austerity: Radical left parties and the Eurosceptic debate. In The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism, ed. B. Leruth, N. Startin, and S. Usherwood, 86–99. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Keith, D., and G. Charalambous. 2016. On the (non) distinctiveness of Marxism–Leninism: The Portuguese and Greek communist parties compared. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49 (2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keith, D., and L. March. 2016. Conclusion: The European radical left; past, present, no future? In Europe’s Radical Left: From Marginality to the Mainstream?, ed. L. March, and D. Keith, 353–379. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  33. Kopecký, P., and C. Mudde. 2002. The two sides of Euroscepticism: Party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics 3 (3): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krouwel, A., and K. Abts. 2007. Varieties of Euroscepticism and populist mobilization: Transforming attitudes from mild Euroscepticism to harsh Euroscepticism. Acta Politica 42 (2–3): 252–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laver, M., and I. Budge. 1992. Measuring policy distances and modeling coalition formation. In Party Policy and Government Coalitions, ed. M. Laver, and I. Budge, 15–40. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laver, M., and J. Garry. 2000. Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin, T.-M., J.M. Enelow, and H. Dorussen. 1999. Equilibrium in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting. Public Choice 98 (1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lowe, W., K. Benoit, S. Mikhaylov, and M. Laver. 2011. Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald, M.D., and S.M. Mendes. 2001. The policy space of party manifestos. In Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, ed. M. Laver, 90–114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. McGann, A.J. 2002. The advantages of ideological cohesion: A model of constituency representation and electoral competition in multi-party democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 14 (1): 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. March, L. 2012. Radical Left Parties in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. March, L., and D. Keith (eds.). 2016. Europe’s Radical Left: From Marginality to the Mainstream?. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Marks, G., and C.J. Wilson. 2000. The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30 (3): 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marks, G., L. Hooghe, M. Nelson, and E. Edwards. 2006. Party competition and European integration in the east and west: Different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Minkenberg, M. 2017. The Radical Right in Eastern Europe: Democracy under Siege?. New York: Palgrave Pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mudde, C. 2005. Politischer Extremismus und Radikalismus in Westeuropa—Typologie und Bestandsaufnahme. In Gefährdungen der Freiheit: Extremistische Ideologien im Vergleich, ed. U. Backes, and E. Jesse, 87–104. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  47. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Müller, W.C., and K. Strøm (eds.). 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Olsen, J., D. Hough, and M. Koß. 2010. Conclusion: Left parties in national governments. In Left parties in national governments, ed. J. Olsen, M. Koß, and D. Hough, 173–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pirro, A.L.P. 2014. Populist radical right parties in Central and Eastern Europe: The different context and issues of the prophets of the patria. Government and Opposition 49 (4): 599–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riker, W.H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rooduijn, M., and T. Akkerman. 2015. Flank attacks: Populism and left–right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics 23 (3): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sitter, N. 2001. The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: Is Euro-scepticism a government-opposition dynamic? West European Politics 24 (4): 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strøm, K. 1990. A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 565–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Szczerbiak, A., and P. Taggart. 2008. Theorizing party-based Euroscepticism: Problems of definition, measurement and causality. In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives, vol. 2, ed. A. Szczerbiak, and P. Taggart, 238–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Szczerbiak, A., and P. Taggart. 2018. Contemporary research on Euroscepticism: The state of the art. In The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism, ed. B. Leruth, N. Startin, and S. Usherwood, 11–21. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Taggart, P. 1998. A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research 33 (3): 363–388.Google Scholar
  59. Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2004. Contemporary Euroscepticism in the party systems of the European Union candidate states of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 43 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2013. Coming in from the cold? Euroscepticism, government participation and party positions in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (1): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Usherwood, S. 2008. The dilemmas of a single-issue party—The UK Independence Party. Representation 44 (3): 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Spanje, J., and W. van der Brug. 2007. The party as pariah: The exclusion of anti-immigration parties and its effect on their ideological positions. West European Politics 30 (5): 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vasilopoulou, S. 2011. European integration and the radical right: Three patterns of opposition. Government and Opposition 46 (2): 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Volkens, A. et al. (2016) The Manifesto data collection [data set, version 2016a], Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu.
  65. Wittman, D.A. 1973. Parties as utility maximizers. American Political Science Review 67 (2): 490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Åbo Akademi UniversityVaasaFinland

Personalised recommendations