Advertisement

Picking on immigrants: a cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice

  • Barbara Yoxon
  • Steven M. Van Hauwaert
  • Johanness Kiess
Original Article

Abstract

In many European countries, anti-immigrant sentiments seem to have spread following recent economic challenges. By drawing on relative deprivation (RD) theory, we establish a theoretical connection between economic downturns and anti-immigrant prejudice. We argue that the experience of individual-level relative deprivation (IRD) is comparable to that of social threat and social exclusion. We draw on a large body of research that suggests the experience of social threat and uncertainty leads to the perception of the world in ethnocentric terms and rejecting pluralistic belief systems. Unlike much of the literature, we focus on individual-level perceptions and distinguish between an objective and subjective relative deprivation. Given our focus on individual-level predictors, we also test for the effects of authoritarian preferences on the likelihood of anti-immigrant bias. Our study demonstrates that unlike objective deprivation, both subjective deprivation and authoritarianism have a significant impact on anti-immigrant sentiments. Furthermore, we find evidence that one component of authoritarian preferences, namely authoritarian submission, moderates the effect of relative deprivation on economic (not cultural) forms of anti-immigrant prejudice.

Keywords

Anti-immigrant Prejudice Relative deprivation Authoritarianism Fixed effects 

References

  1. Abrams, D., and P.R. Grant. 2012. Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: the political rise of Scottish nationalism. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (4): 674–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, N.E., E.S. Epel, G. Castellazzo, and J.R. Ickovics. 2000. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology 19 (6): 586–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, C.R., V.D. Thompson, V.A. Smith, R.H. Gramzow, and D.P. Currey. 1993. Proximal and distal predictors of homophobia: framing the multivariate roots of outgroup rejection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23 (24): 2013–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, P.D. 2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Altemeyer, B. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Agroskin, D., and E. Jonas. 2010. Out of control: how and why does perceived lack of control lead to ethnocentrism? Review of Psychology 17 (2): 1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Akkerman, T., S. de Lange, and M. Rooduijn. 2016. Radical Right-wing Populist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Ashmore, R.D. 1970. Prejudice: causes and cures. In Social Psychology: Social Influence, Attitude Change, Group Processes, and Prejudice, ed. Barry E. Collins, 245–339. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  9. Aydin, N., J.I. Krueger, D. Frey, A. Kastenmüller, and P. Fischer. 2014. Social exclusion and xenophobia: intolerant attitudes toward ethnic and religious minorities. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 17 (3): 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bermeo, N.G. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bermeo, N.G., and L.M. Bartels. 2014. Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biernat, M., T.K. Vescio, and S.A. Theno. 1996. Violating American values: A “value-congruence” approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32 (4): 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blau, J.R., and P.M. Blau. 1982. The cost of inequality: metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review 47 (1): 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callan, M.J., J.H. Ellard, N. Shead, and D.C. Hodgins. 2008. Gambling as a search for justice: examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (11): 1514–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaplin, D. 2003. Hierarchical linear models: strengths and weaknesses. paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 9 December, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, P., Crawford, C., Steele, F., and Vignoles, A. 2010. The Choice Between Fixed and Random Effects Models: Some Considerations for Educational Research. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. IZA Discussion Paper Series 5287.Google Scholar
  17. Cohrs, C.J., and F. Ashbrock. 2009. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology 39 (2): 270–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohrs, J.C., and S. Ibler. 2009. Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 31 (1): 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. West, and L. Aiken. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Crawford, J.T., M.J. Brandt, Y. Inbar, and S.R. Mallinas. 2016. Right-wing authoritarianism predicts prejudice equally toward “gay men and lesbians” and “homosexuals”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111 (2): 31-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Creighton, M.J., A. Jamal, and N.C. Malancu. 2015. Has opposition to immigration increased in the United States after the economic crisis? An experimental approach. International Migration Review 49 (3): 727–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crosby, F. 1976. A model of egotistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review 83 (2): 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crosby, F. 1984. Relative deprivation in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (1): 51–93.Google Scholar
  24. Davies, J.C. 1962. Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review 27 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Tocqucville, A. 1955. The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New York, NY: Garden City.Google Scholar
  26. Decker, O., K. Rothe, M. Weißmann, J. Kiess, and E. Brähler. 2013. Economic prosperity as "narcissistic filling": A missing link between political attitudes and right-wing authoritarianism. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 7 (1): 136–149.Google Scholar
  27. Duckitt, J. 2001. A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 33, ed. M. Zanna, 41–113. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Duckitt, J., and K. Fisher. 2003. The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology 24 (1): 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duckitt, J., and C.G. Sibley. 2010. Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality 78 (6): 1861–1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Duckitt, J., C. Wagner, I. du Plessis, and I. Birum. 2002. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (1): 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eibner, C., R. Sturn, and C.R. Gresenz. 2004. Does relative deprivation predict the need for mental health services? The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 7 (4): 167–175.Google Scholar
  32. Esses, V.M., and G. Hodson. 2006. The role of lay perceptions of ethnic prejudice in the maintenance and perpetuation of ethnic bias. Journal of Social Issues 62 (3): 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Falter, J.W. 1994. Die Massenbasis des Rechtsextremismus in Europa in vergleichender perspektive. Jahrbuch Extremismus und Demokratie 6 (1): 35–56.Google Scholar
  34. Feldman, A., and K. Stenner. 1997. Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology 18 (4): 741–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Friesen, J.P., A.C. Kay, R.P. Eibach, and A.D. Galinsky. 2014. Seeking structure in social organization: compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106 (4): 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fritsche, I., E. Jonas, and T. Fankhänel. 2008. The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on group support and defence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (3): 524–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fritsche, I., E. Jonas, and T. Kessler. 2011. Collective reactions to threat: implications for intergroup conflict and for solving societal crises. Social Issues and Policy Review 5 (1): 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Glick, P., and S.T. Fiske. 1996. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grant, P.R. 2008. The protest intentions of skilled immigrants with credentialing problems: A test of a model integrating relative deprivation theory with social identity theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 47 (4): 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grant, P.R., D. Abrams, D.W. Robertson, and J. Garay. 2015. Predicting protests by disadvantaged skilled immigrants: a test of an integrated social identity, relative deprivation, collective efficacy (SIRDE) model. Social Justice Research 28 (1): 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grieve, P.G., and M.A. Hogg. 1999. Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (8): 926–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guimond, S., and M. Dambrun. 2002. When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: the effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (8): 900–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gurney, J.N., and K.J. Tierney. 1982. Relative deprivation and social movements: a critical look at twenty years of research. The Sociological Quarterly 23 (1): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gurr, T.R. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Healey, J.F., and A. Stepnick. 2016. Diversity and Society: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender, 5th ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Herek, G.M. 2010. Sexual orientation differences as deficits: Science and stigma in the history of American psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (6): 693–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hjerm, M. 2009. Anti-immigrant attitudes and cross-municipal variation in the proportion of immigrants. Acta Sociologica 52 (1): 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hodson, G. 2009. The puzzling person-situation schism in prejudice research. Journal of Research in Personality 43 (2): 247–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hodson, G., and K. Dhont. 2015. The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology 26 (1): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hodson, G., K. Costello, and C.C. MacInnis. 2013. Is intergroup contact beneficial among intolerant people? Exploring individual differences in the benefits of contact on attitudes. In Advances in Intergroup Contact, ed. G. Hodson, and M. Hewstone, 49–80. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hogg, M.A. 2012. Uncertainty-identity theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 2, ed. P.A.M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, and E.T. Higgins, 62–80. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hogg, M.A. 2014. From uncertainty to extremism: social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (5): 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hox, J.J. 1998. Multilevel modelling: when and why. In Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways, ed. I. Balderjahn, R. Mathar, and M. Schader, 147–154. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hox, J.J. 2010. Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Jetten, J., N.R. Branscombe, S.A. Haslam, C. Haslam, T. Cruwys, J.M. Jones, L. Cui, G. Dingle, J. Liu, S. Murphy, A. Thai, Z. Walter, and A. Zhanget. 2015. Having a lot of a good thing: multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem. PLoS ONE 10 (6): e0131035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jones, A.M., and J. Wildman. 2008. Health, income and relative deprivation: Evidence from the BHPS. Journal of Health Economics 27 (2): 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kawachi, I., B. Kennedy, and R.G. Wilkinson. 1999. Crime: social disorganization and relative deprivation. Social Science and Medicine 48 (6): 719–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kawakami, K., and K.L. Dion. 1993. The impact of salient self-identities on relative deprivation and action intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology 23 (5): 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kay, A., J.A. Whitson, D. Gaucher, and A.D. Galinsky. 2009. Compensatory control: achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (5): 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kennedy, P.E. 2003. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lancee, B., and S. Pardos-Prado. 2013. Group conflict theory in a longitudinal perspective: Analyzing the dynamic side of ethnic competition. International Migration Review 47 (1): 106–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Landau, M.J., A.C. Kay, and J.A. Whitson. 2015. Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin 141 (3): 694–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lavine, H., M. Lodge, and K. Freitas. 2005. Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology 26 (2): 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lipset, S.M. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Mark, M. M., and Folger, R. 1984. Responses to relative deprivation: a conceptual framework. In: P. Shaver (ed.) Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 5. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 198–202.Google Scholar
  66. Marx, K. 1935. Wage, Labour and Capital. New York, NY: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. McCann, S.J.H. 2009. Political conservatism, authoritarianism, and societal threat: voting for republican representatives in U.S. congressional elections from 1946 to 1992. The Journal of Psychology 143 (4): 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McFarland, S. 2010. Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology 31 (3): 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morrison, D.E. 1971. Some notes toward theory on relative deprivation, social movements, and social change. American Behavioral Scientist 14 (5): 675–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mullin, B.A., and M.A. Hogg. 1998. Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology 37 (3): 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Navarro, V. 1999. Health and equity in the world in the era of “globalization”. International Journal of Health Services 29 (2): 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mishra, S., and D. Novakowski. 2016. Personal Relative deprivation and risk: an examination of individual differences in personality, attitudes, and behavioral outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences 90 (1): 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Murnane, R., and J. Willet. 2011. Methods Matter. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Osborne, D., and C.G. Sibley. 2013. Through rose-colored glasses: system-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 39 (8): 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Osborne, D., Y.J. Huo, and H.J. Smith. 2014. Organizational respect dampens the impact of group-based relative deprivation on willingness to protest pay cuts. British Journal of Social Psychology 54 (1): 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Passini, S. 2015a. Different ways of being authoritarian: the distinct effects of authoritarian dimensions on values and prejudice. Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12309.Google Scholar
  78. Passini, S. 2015b. Social relations, the financial crisis and human development. In Social Relations in Human and Societal Development, ed. C. Psaltis, A. Gillespie, and A. Perret-Clermont, 194–214. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pettigrew, T.F. 2015. Samuel Stouffer and relative deprivation. Social Psychology Quarterly 78 (1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pettigrew, T.F. 2016. In pursuit of three theories: authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology 67 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pettigrew, T.F., O. Christ, U. Wagner, R.W. Meertens, R. van Dick, and A. Zick. 2008. Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues 64 (2): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pettigrew, T.F., and R.W. Meertens. 1995. Subtle and blatant prejudice in western europe. European Journal of Social Psychology 25 (1): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rippl, S., and C. Seipel. 2012. Threat appraisal and authoritarianism in context: reactions to the European Union enlargement in border regions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42 (11): 2758–2775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Runciman, W.G. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  85. Rustenbach, E. 2010. Sources of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Europe: A multi- level analysis. International Migration Review 44 (1): 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Saucier, G. 2000. Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (2): 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schmitt, M., J. Maes, and K.F. Widaman. 2010. Longitudinal Effects of egoistic and fraternal relative deprivation on well-being and protest. International Journal of Psychology 45 (2): 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schneider, S.L. 2008. Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 24 (1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scott, J. 1998. Changing attitudes to sexual morality: A cross-national comparison. Sociology 32 (4): 815–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sibley, C.G., and J. Duckitt. 2008. Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (3): 248–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sidanius, J., and F. Pratto. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, H.J., T. Cronin, and T. Kessler. 2008. Anger, fear, or sadness: faculty members’ emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology 29 (2): 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith, H.J., and D.J. Ortiz. 2002. Is it just me?: The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development and Integration, ed. I. Walker, and H.J. Smith, 91–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, H.J., T.F. Pettigrew, G.M. Pippin, and S. Bialosiewicz. 2012. Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 16 (3): 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stark, O., and J.E. Taylor. 1989. Relative deprivation and international migration. Demography 26 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stark, O., and S. Yitzhaki. 1988. Labour migration as a response to relative deprivation. Journal of Population Economics 1 (1): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Steenbergen, M.R., and B.S. Jones. 2002. Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stegmueller, D. 2013. How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches. American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 748–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stenner, K. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stouffer, S.A., E.A. Schuman, L.C. DeVinney, S.A. Star, and R.B. Williams. 1949. The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life, vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Tajfel, H. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Taylor, M.C. 2002. Fraternal deprivation, collective threat, and racial resentment: perspectives on white racism. In Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration, ed. I. Walker, and H.J. Smith, 13–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Thomsen, L., E. Green, and J. Sidanius. 2008. We will hunt them down: how social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (6): 1455–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Van Kessel, S. 2015. Populist Parties in Europe: Agents of Discontent?. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Verkuyten, M., and L. Hagendoorn. 1998. Prejudice and self-categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and in-group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (1): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Walker, I., and L. Mann. 1987. Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13 (2): 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Walker, I., and T.F. Pettigrew. 1984. Relative deprivation theory: an overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology 23 (4): 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Whitley, B.E., and S. Ægisdóttir. 2000. The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles 42 (11): 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Whitley, B.E., and S.E. Lee. 2000. The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30 (1): 144–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Whitson, J.A., A.D. Galinsky, and A.C. Kay. 2015. The emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and belief in the paranormal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 56 (1): 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zamora-Kapoor, A., and M. Verea. 2014. ‘Public attitudes toward immigration in turbulent times. Migration Studies 2 (2): 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Yoxon
    • 1
  • Steven M. Van Hauwaert
    • 2
  • Johanness Kiess
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany & Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)Ciudad de MexicoMexico
  3. 3.University of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations