Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 204–230 | Cite as

What about the welfare state? exploring precarious youth political participation in the age of grievances

  • Matteo Bassoli
  • Lara Monticelli
Original Article

Abstract

In this paper, the authors analyse non-institutionalised political participation patterns of precarious urban youth in five European cities—Cologne (Germany), Geneva (Switzerland), Kielce (Poland), Lyon (France) and Turin (Italy)—following the 2008 financial crisis. In particular, the aim is to test the validity of the ‘grievance theory’ on precarious youth. In fact, the political participation of precarious youth has been overlooked to date. The article shows that across the cities, precarious workers exhibit higher levels of political participation owing to a sense of relative deprivation with respect to their regularly employed counterparts. The authors apply a logit analysis to duly consider the local context (i.e. unemployment regulations and labour market regulations). The empirical results show that precarious youth are more active than regular workers when unemployment regulations and labour market regulations are at their intermediate level, featuring as ‘issue-specific’ political opportunity structures. In sum, the article contributes to the debate on occupational disadvantage and political participation, shifting the focus on precarious young workers.

Keywords

Non-institutionalised political participation Job precariousness Grievance theory Youth Welfare regimes Political opportunity structures 

References

  1. Almond, G.A., and S. Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C.J. 2001. Desperate Times Call for Desperate Measures? In Unemployment in the New Europe, ed. N. Bermeo, 271–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C.J., and J. Pontusson. 2007. Workers, Worries and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Research 46 (2): 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arts, W., and J. Gelissen. 2002. Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy 12 (2): 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, P.C. 2010. Estimating Multilevel Logistic Regression Models When the Number of Clusters is Low: A Comparison of Different Statistical Software Procedures. The International Journal of Biostatistics 6 (1): 0–18. Article 16.Google Scholar
  6. Baglioni, S., P. Colloca, and M. Theiss. 2015. Political Participation of Unemployed Youth: The Moderator Effect of Associational Membership. PArtecipazione e COnflitto 8 (3): 770–787.Google Scholar
  7. Barbieri, P., and S. Scherer. 2005. Le conseguenze sociali della flessibilizzazione del mercato del lavoro in Italia. Stato e mercato (2): 291.Google Scholar
  8. Bassoli, M. 2010. Local Governance Arrangements and Democratic Outcomes (with Some Evidence from the Italian Case). Governance 23 (3): 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bassoli, M., and L. Monticelli. 2011. Laureati, precari e politicamente attivi. L’impatto del lavoro e della scuola sulle forme della partecipazione. In La ricerca sociologica e i temi del lavoro. Giovani ricercatori italiani a confronto, ed. M. La Rosa, 150–167. Milano: F. Angeli.Google Scholar
  10. Bassoli, M., and L. Monticelli. 2016. Precarious Voices? Types of “Political Citizens” and Repertoires of Action among European Youth. PArtecipazione e COnflitto 9 (3): 824–856.Google Scholar
  11. Berthet, T., and C. Bourgeois. 2014. Towards ‘activation-friendly’ integration? Assessing the progress of activation policies in six European countries: Towards ‘activation-friendly’ integration. International Journal of Social Welfare 23: S23–S39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berton, F., M. Richiardi, and S. Sacchi. 2009. Flex-insecurity: perché in Italia la flessibilità diventa precarietà. Bologna: Il mulino.Google Scholar
  13. Boeri, T., and P. Garibaldi. 2007. Two Tier Reforms of Employment Protection: a Honeymoon Effect?*: A HONEYMOON EFFECT. The Economic Journal 117 (521): F357–F385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brady, H.E., S. Verba, and K.L. Schlozman. 1995. Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation. The American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bussing, A. 1999. Can control at work and social support moderate psychological consequences of job insecurity? results from a quasi-experimental study in the steel industry. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 8 (2): 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castel, R. 1995. Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  17. Cinalli, M., and M. Giugni. 2010. Welfare States, Political Opportunities, and Claim Making in the Field of Unemployment Politics. In The Contentious Politics of Unemployment in Europe, ed. M. Giugni, 19–42. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230304208_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cinalli, M., and M. Giugni. 2013. New Challenges for the Welfare State: The Emergence of Youth Unemployment Regimes in Europe? New Challenges for the Welfare State’. International Journal of Social Welfare 22 (3): 290–299. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cinalli, M., and M. Giugni. 2014. The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Politicization of Civil Society Organizations in the Field of Unemployment and Precarity. In Civil Society Organizations, Unemployment, and Precarity in Europe, ed. S. Baglioni, and M. Giugni, 85–106. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230391437_5.Google Scholar
  20. Coffé, H., and C. Bolzendahl. 2010. Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation. Sex Roles 62 (5–6): 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corbetta, P., and P. Colloca. 2013. Job Precariousness and Political Orientations: The Case of Italy. South European Society and Politics 18 (3): 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Corrigall-Brown, C. 2012. Patterns of protest: trajectories of participation in social movements. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Craw, M. 2015. The Effect of Fragmentation and Second-Order Devolution on Efficacy of Local Public Welfare Policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45 (2): 270–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dalton, R.J. 2008. Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies 56 (1): 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Witte, H., and K. Näswall. 2003. `Objective’ vs `Subjective’ Job Insecurity: Consequences of Temporary Work for Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Four European Countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy 24 (2): 149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Della Porta, D. 2008. Protest on unemployment: forms and opportunities. Mobilization 13 (3): 277–295.Google Scholar
  27. Demazière, D., and M.T. Pignoni. 1998. Chômeurs–du silence à la révolte: sociologie d’une action collective. Paris: Hachette littératures.Google Scholar
  28. Driskell, R., E. Embry, and L. Lyon. 2008. Faith and Politics: The Influence of Religious Beliefs on Political Participation. Social Science Quarterly 89 (2): 294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dörre, K., K. Kraemer, and F. Speidel. 2006. The increasing precariousness of the employment society: driving force for a new right wing populism? International Journal of Action Research 2 (1): 98–128.Google Scholar
  30. Eggert, N., and M. Giugni. 2010. Does Associational Involvement Spur Political Integration? Political Interest and Participation of Three Immigrant Groups in Zurich. Swiss Political Science Review 16 (2): 175–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eichhorst, W., and P. Marx (eds.). 2015. Non-standard employment in post-industrial labour markets: an occupational perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Emmenegger, P. (ed.). 2012. The age of dualization: the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Emmenegger, P., J. Kvist, P. Marx, and K. Peresen. 2015. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: The making of a classic. Journal of European Social Policy 25 (1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. EUROSTAT (2015). EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology—population structure—Statistics Explained. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/EU_statistics_on_income_and_living_conditions_(EU-SILC)_methodology_-_population_structure [Accessed August 18, 2016].
  36. Forno, F., and P.R. Graziano. 2014. Sustainable community movement organisations. Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gallie, D., and S. Paugam. 2000. Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gamson, W.A. 1968. Power and discontent. vol. 124. Homewood: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gamson, W.A., and D.S. Meyer. 1996. Framing political opportunity. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, eds. D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy, and M.N. Zald, 275–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gebel, M. 2011. Early career consequences of temporary employment in Germany and the UK. Work, Employment & Society 24 (4): 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giugni, M. and Lorenzini, J. (2013) Employment Status and Political Participation: Does Exclusion Influence the Protest Behavior of the Young Unemployed? In: B. Andreosso-O’Callaghan and F. Royall, eds. Economic and Political Change in Asia and Europe. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 179–195. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-94-007-4653-4_11.
  42. Gurr, T.R. 1970. Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Harrington, J.W., and P.W. Daniels (eds.). 2006. Knowledge-based services, internationalization and regional development. Aldersht: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Hooghe, M., B. Hosch-Dayican, and J.W. van Deth. 2014. Conceptualizing political participation. Acta Politica 49 (3): 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hooghe, M., and E. Quintelier. 2014. Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics 12 (2): 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Jessoula, M., P.R. Graziano, and I. Madama. 2010. Selective Flexicurity’ in Segmented Labour Markets: The Case of Italian ‘Mid-Siders. Journal of Social Policy 39 (4): 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kazepov, Y. 2010. Rescaling social policies: towards multilevel governance in Europe, Farnham. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  49. Kern, A., S. Marien, and M. Hooghe. 2015. Economic Crisis and Levels of Political Participation in Europe (2002–2010): The Role of Resources and Grievances. West European Politics 38 (3): 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kitschelt, H.P. 1986. Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kriesi, H. 2004. Political Context and Opportunity. In The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell companions to sociology, ed. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 67–90. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  52. Kriesi, H. 2012. The Political Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe: Electoral Punishment and Popular Protest. Swiss Political Science Review 18 (4): 518–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachar, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey. 2006. Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachar, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey. 2008. West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. La Due Lake, R., and R. Huckfeldt. 1998. Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation. Political Psychology 19 (3): 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levi, M., and L. Stoker. 2000. Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lorenzini, J., and M. Bassoli. 2015. Gender ideology: The last barrier to womens participation in political consumerism? International Journal of Comparative Sociology 56 (6): 460–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lorenzini, J., and M. Giugni. 2015. Welfare institutions, resources, and political learning. Interacting with the State as an Incentive for the Political Participa-tion of Long-Term Unemployed Youth. PArtecipazione e COnflitto 8 (3): 814–844.Google Scholar
  59. Lorenzini, J., and M. Giugni. 2012. Employment Status, Social Capital, and Political Participation: A Comparison of Unemployed and Employed Youth in Geneva. Swiss Political Science Review 18 (3): 332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Maclennan, D., and A. O’Sullivan. 2013. Localism. Devolution and Housing Policies. Housing Studies 28 (4): 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marien, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2010. Inequalities in Non-institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-level Analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies 58 (1): 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marx, P. 2014. Labour market risks and political preferences: The case of temporary employment. European Journal of Political Research 53 (1): 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marx, P., and G. Picot. 2013. The party preferences of atypical workers in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy 23 (2): 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mattoni, A. 2016. Media practices and protest politics: How precarious workers mobilise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Maurer, S., and N. Mayer. 2001. Les chômeurs en action (décembre 1997–mars 1998) mobilisation collective et ressources compensatoires. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  66. Mertens, A., V. Gash, and F. McGinnity. 2007. The Cost of Flexibility at the Margin. Comparing the Wage Penalty for Fixed-term Contracts in Germany and Spain using Quantile Regression. Labour 21 (4–5): 637–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meyer, D.S., and D.C. Minkoff. 2004. Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces 82 (4): 1457–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Murgia, A., and E. Armano (eds.). 2012. Mappe della precarieta. Spazi, rappresentazioni, esperienze e critica delle politiche del lavoro che cambia. Bologna: I libri di Emil.Google Scholar
  69. Niemi, R.G., S.C. Craig, and F. Mattei. 1991. Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. The American Political Science Review 85: 1407–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Palier, B. (ed.). 2010. A long goodbye to Bismarck?: the politics of welfare reforms in continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Perea, E.A. 2002. Individual characteristics, institutional incentives and electoral abstention in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 41 (5): 643–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piven, F.F., and R.A. Cloward. 1977. Poor people’s movements: why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  73. Rosanvallon, P. 2008. Counter-democracy: politics in an age of distrust. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schlozman, K.L., N. Burns, and S. Verba. 1999. ‘What Happened at Work Today?’: A Multistage Model of Gender, Employment, and Political Participation. The Journal of Politics 61 (1): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schur, L. 2003. Employment and the Creation of an Active Citizenry. British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (4): 751–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Solt, F. 2008. Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Standing, G. 2011. The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  78. Stiglitz, J.E. 2015. Devolution, independence, and the optimal provision of public goods. Economics of Transportation 4 (1–2): 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stolle, D., and M. Hooghe. 2011. Shifting Inequalities: Patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation. European Societies 13 (1): 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sverke, M., J. Hellgren, and K. Näswall. 2002. No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7 (3): 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Der Meer, T.T., and E.E. Van Ingen. 2009. Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries. European Journal of Political Research 48 (2): 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. van Deth, J.W. 2014. A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica 49 (3): 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Verba, S., et al. 1993. Citizen Activity: Who Participates? What Do They Say? The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, H. Brady, and N.H. Nie. 1973. The modes of participation. Continuities in research. Comparative Political Studies 6 (2): 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Verba, S., H.N. Nie, and J.-O. Kim. 1978. Participation and political equality: a seven-nation comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Vráblíková, K. 2014. How Context Matters? Mobilization, Political Opportunity Structures, and Nonelectoral Political Participation in Old and New Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 47 (2): 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wilkes, R. 2004. First nation politics: deprivation, resources, and participation in collective action. Sociological Inquiry 74 (4): 570–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LaweCampus UniversityNovedrateItaly
  2. 2.Institute for Humanities and Social SciencesScuola Normale SuperioreFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations