Acta Politica

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 184–203 | Cite as

The impact of policy content and party label on policy agreement and candidate support. An analysis on the issue of the integration of immigrants

  • Hilde CofféEmail author
Original Article


There is an ongoing debate in the public opinion and voting behaviour literature on whether policy content or party cues determine voters’ opinions and electoral behaviour. This study focuses on the issue of the integration of immigrants, and assesses to what extent the policy content and a radical right party label relate to voters’ likelihood of agreeing with the policy and of voting for the candidate introducing the policy. The analysis, using experimental video data with hypothetical political candidates embedded in a representative Dutch survey (LISS) (N = 3249), reveals that the influence of the radical right label is limited. It only negatively affects the likelihood of supporting a candidate and agreeing with the policy among voters who do not support a mainstream right or radical right party. The content of the policy plays a major role. In particular, a radical right compared with mainstream right policy towards the integration of immigrants decreases the likelihood of agreeing with the policy and supporting the candidate presenting such a policy among non-radical right voters. Radical right voters are substantially more likely to agree with a restrictive migration policy and to support a candidate presenting such a policy than voters of all other parties.


Party label Policy content Policy agreement Candidate support Migration policy Radical right 



I would like to thank the Institute of Governmental Studies, the University of California, Berkeley for its hospitality while working on the paper; the Victoria University of Wellington for funding; and the MESS (Measurement and Experimentation in the Social Sciences) project for accepting my research proposal, helping with recording the videos, and providing the data. I am also grateful to Laura Stoker for the fruitful discussions and methodological help, and to Sebastiaan Bierema and Sam Crawley for their editorial help. A previous version of the paper has been presented at the Leuphana University of Lüneburg, the Institute of Political Science and Center for the Study of Democracy, and at the University of California, Berkeley, the Institute of Governmental Studies, Race, Ethnicity and Immigration Colloquium. I would like to thank all participants for their helpful comments and feedback. Finally, my study gained from the reviewers’ comments and suggestions.


  1. Aaroe, L. 2012. When Citizens Go Against Elite Directions: Partisan Cues and Contrast Effects on Citizens’ Attitudes. Party Politics 18 (2): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale, T., C. Green-Pederson, A. Krouwel, K.R. Luther, and N. Sitter. 2010. If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies 58: 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechtel, M.M., J. Hainmueller, D. Hangartner, and M. Helbling. 2015. Reality Bites: The Limits of Framing Effects for Salient and Contested Policy Issues. Political Science Research and Methods 3 (3): 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berning, C.C., and E. Schlueter. 2016. The Dynamics of Radical Right-Wing Populist Party Preferences and Perceived Group Threat: A Comparative Panel Analysis of Three Competing Hypotheses in the Netherlands and Germany. Social Science Research 55: 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boudreau, C., and S.A. MacKenzie. 2014. Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives. American Journal of Political Science 58 (1): 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brader, T., and J. Tucker. 2012. “Following the Party’s Lead: Party Cues, Policy Opinion and the Power of Partisanship in Three Multiparty Systems. Comparative Politics 44 (4): 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brader, T., J. Tucker, and D. Duell. 2012. Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 46 (11): 1485–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullock, J.G. 2011. Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate. American Political Science Review 105 (3): 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coan, Travis G., Jennifer L. Merolla, Laura B. Stephenson, and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. 2008. It’s Not Easy Being Green: Minor Party Labels as Heuristic Aids. Political Psychology 29 (3): 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coffé, H. 2005. Do Individual Factors Explain the Different Success of the Two Belgian Extreme Right Parties? Acta Politica 40 (1): 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, G.L. 2003. Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5): 802–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conroy-Krutz, J., D.C. Moehler, and R. Aguilar. 2016. Partisan Cues and Vote Choice in New Multiparty Systems. Comparative Political Studies 49 (1): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delli Carpini, M.X., and S. Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  15. Eger, M.A. and S. Valdez. 2014. “Neo-nationalism in Western Europe.” European Sociological Review. doi:  10.1093/esr/jcu087.
  16. Feldman, S., and P.J. Conover. 1983. Candidates, Issues and Voters: The Role of Inference in Political Perception. Journal of Politics 45 (4): 810–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green, D., B. Palmquist, and E. Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Green-Pedersen, C., and J. Krogstrup. 2008. “Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research 47 (5): 610–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halikiopoulou, D., S. Mock, and S. Vasilopoulou. 2013. The Civic Zeitgeist: Nationalism and Liberal Values in the European Radical Right. Nations and Nationalism 19 (1): 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huckfeldt, R., J. Levine, W. Margan, and J. Sprague. 1999. Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations. American Journal of Political Science 43: 888–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Immerzeel, T., H. Coffé, and T. van der Lippe. 2015. Explaining the Gender Gap in Radical Right Voting: A Cross-National Investigation in 12 Western-European Countries. Comparative European Politics 13 (2): 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivarsflaten, E. 2005. Threatened by Diversity: Why Rerestrictiveive Asylum and Immigration Policies Appeal to Voters in Western Europe. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15 (1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, R. 2006. Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences? Annual Review of Political Science 9 (1): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kam, C.D. 2005. Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values and Individual Differences. Political Behavior 27 (2): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitschelt, H. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kitschelt, H. 2007. Growth and Persistence of the Radical Right in Postindustrial Democracies: Advances and Challenges in Comparative Research. West European Politics 30 (5): 1176–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lubbers, M., M. Gijsberts, and P. Scheepers. 2002. Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 245–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucardie, P. 2010. Tussen establishment en extremism: populistische partijen in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Res Publica 2: 149–165.Google Scholar
  29. Mayer, N. 2002. Ces Français Qui Votent Le Pen. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  30. Merolla, J.L., L.B. Stephenson, and E.J. Zechmeister. 2008. Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In)Effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mutz, D.C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norris, P. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahn, W.M. 1993. The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information-Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rydgren, J. 2008. Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists? Radical Right-Wing Voting in Six West European Countries. European Journal of Political Research 47 (6): 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Samuels, D., and C. Zucco. 2014. The Power of Partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from Survey Experiments. American Journal of Political Science 58 (1): 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skenderovic, D. 2007. Immigration and the Radical Right in Switzerland: Ideology, Discourse and Opportunities. Patterns of Prejudice 41 (2): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Squire, P., and E.R.A.N. Smith. 1988. The Effect of Partisan Information on Voters in Nonpartisan Elections. Journal of Politics 50: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tomz, M, and P. Sniderman. 2005. “Brand Names and the Organization of Mass Belief Systems.” Unpublished Manuscript. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  40. van Heerden, S., and B. Creusen. 2014. Responding to the Populist Radical Right: The Dutch Case. In European Populism and Winning the Immigration Debate, ed. C. Sandelind, 179–212. Falun: Scandbook.Google Scholar
  41. Van Kersbergen, K., and A. Krouwel. 2008. A Double-Edged Sword! The Dutch Centre-Right and the ‘Foreigners Issue. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (3): 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vliegenthart, R., and C. Roggeband. 2007. Framing Immigration and Integration. Relationships Between Press and Parliament in the Netherlands. The International Communication Gazette 69 (3): 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walgrave, S., and K. De Swert. 2004. The Making of the (Issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication 21: 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, M.H. 2010. Can Leopards Change Their Spots? Between Xenophobia and Trans-ethnic Populism among West European Far Right Parties. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 16 (1): 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations