Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 48–67 | Cite as

Labor market disadvantage and political alienation: a longitudinal perspective on the heterogeneous risk in temporary employment

  • Dominik Schraff
Original Article
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates whether and how individual shocks of temporary employment translate into feelings of political alienation. Recently, research started to investigate cross-sectional associations between temporary employment, political attitudes and behavior. Yet, the cross-sectional research so far struggles to disentangle empirically whether the relationship between temporary work and political orientations is determined by structural factors only – such as skill-set and education – or whether we are also able to observe the dynamic patterns suggested in theoretical arguments. This paper takes up the task of tracing the dynamic relationship between temporary employment experiences and adjustments in political orientations. It is argued that temporary employment has ambiguous effects on political orientations and that we are in need for convincing strategies to tackle this heterogeneity. Using perceived risk measures as mediators, we propose a strategy to capture the dynamic effects of temporary employment. Fixed-effects regressions show that if temporary employment experiences are translated by increases in perceived job insecurity and perceived financial insecurity, trust in politics starts to erode. The identification of such dynamic patterns is highly relevant for research on the political effects of labor market disadvantages.

Keywords

labor market disadvantage temporary employment insider–outsider conflict political alienation panel data 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For helpful comments and advise, I would like to thank Patrick Emmenegger, Flavia Fossati, Paul Marx, and André Walter, as well as the two anonymous reviewers. Of course, all remaining errors are mine.

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2009) Fixed effects regression models. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin, D. F. and Krosnick, J. A. (1991) Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003) Public attitudes toward welfare state policies a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M. and Frank, J. (2002) Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? Economic Journal, 112(480), F189–F213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgoon, B. and Dekker, F. (2010) flexible employment, economic insecurity and social policy preferences in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(2), 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Citrin, J., Mcclosky, H., Merrill Shanks, J. and Sniderman, P. M. (1975) Personal and political sources of political alienation. British Journal of Political Science, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbetta, P. and Colloca, P. (2013) Job precariousness and political orientations: The case of Italy. South European Society and Politics, 18(3), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Easton, D. (1975) A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmenegger, P. (2009) Barriers to entry: Insider/outsider politics and the political determinants of job security regulations. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emmenegger, P. (2014) The power to dismiss. Trade unions and the regulation of job security in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2012) How We Grow Unequal. In P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (Eds.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 3–26). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emmenegger, P., Marx, P. and Schraff, D. (2015) Labour market disadvantage, political orientations and voting: How adverse labour market experiences translate into electoral behaviour. Socio-Economic Review, 13(2), 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emmenegger, P., Marx, P. and Schraff, D. (2017) Off to a bad start: Unemployment and political interest during early adulthood. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enders, C. K. (2001) A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fong, C. (2001) Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giesecke, J. (2009) Socio-economic risks of atypical employment relationships: Evidence from the German labour market. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 629–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H. (1999) The real worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamermesh, D. S. (2004) Subjective outcomes in economics. Southern Economic Journal, 71(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hatemi, P. K., Funk, C. L., Medland, S. E., Maes, H. M., Silberg, J. L., Martin, N. G., et al. (2009) Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1141–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Honaker, J., King, G. and Blackwell, M. (2011) Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, G. and Honaker, J. (2001) Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 49–69.Google Scholar
  22. King, D. and Rueda, D. (2008) Cheap labor: The new politics of “bread and roses” in industrial democracies. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 279–297.Google Scholar
  23. Lieberson, S. and Hansen, L. K. (1974) National development, mother tongue diversity, and the comparative study of nations. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindvall, J. and Rueda, D. (2013) The insider-outsider Dilemma. British Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marx, P. (2014a) Labour market risks and political preferences: The case of temporary employment. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marx, P. (2014b) The effect of job insecurity and employability on preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(4), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marx, P. (2015) The political behavior of temporary workers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marx, P. (2016) The insider-outsider divide and economic voting: Testing a new theory with german electoral data. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marx, P. and Picot, G. (2013) The party preferences of atypical workers in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(2), 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mughan, A., Bean, C. and McAllister, I. (2003) Economic globalization, job insecurity and the populist reaction. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mughan, A. and Lacy, D. (2002) Economic performance, job insecurity and electoral choice. British Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD. (2014) Labor Force Statistics 2014. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. Pontusson, J. and Rueda, D. (2010) The politics of inequality: Voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comparative Political Studies, 43(6), 675–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rubin, D. B. (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rueda, D. (2005) Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challange to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwander, H. and Häusermann, S. (2013) Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sobel, M. E. (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Meeer, T. and Dekker, P. (2011) Trustworthy states, trusting citizens? A multilevel study into objective and subjective determinants of political trust. In S. Zmerli and M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political Trust. Why Context Matters (pp. 95–116). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  39. Verba, S., Scholzman, K. L. and Brady, H. E. (1995) Voice and equality. Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Comparative and International StudiesETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations