Labor market disadvantage and political alienation: a longitudinal perspective on the heterogeneous risk in temporary employment
- 134 Downloads
This paper investigates whether and how individual shocks of temporary employment translate into feelings of political alienation. Recently, research started to investigate cross-sectional associations between temporary employment, political attitudes and behavior. Yet, the cross-sectional research so far struggles to disentangle empirically whether the relationship between temporary work and political orientations is determined by structural factors only – such as skill-set and education – or whether we are also able to observe the dynamic patterns suggested in theoretical arguments. This paper takes up the task of tracing the dynamic relationship between temporary employment experiences and adjustments in political orientations. It is argued that temporary employment has ambiguous effects on political orientations and that we are in need for convincing strategies to tackle this heterogeneity. Using perceived risk measures as mediators, we propose a strategy to capture the dynamic effects of temporary employment. Fixed-effects regressions show that if temporary employment experiences are translated by increases in perceived job insecurity and perceived financial insecurity, trust in politics starts to erode. The identification of such dynamic patterns is highly relevant for research on the political effects of labor market disadvantages.
Keywordslabor market disadvantage temporary employment insider–outsider conflict political alienation panel data
For helpful comments and advise, I would like to thank Patrick Emmenegger, Flavia Fossati, Paul Marx, and André Walter, as well as the two anonymous reviewers. Of course, all remaining errors are mine.
- Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2012) How We Grow Unequal. In P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (Eds.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 3–26). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- King, G. and Honaker, J. (2001) Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 49–69.Google Scholar
- King, D. and Rueda, D. (2008) Cheap labor: The new politics of “bread and roses” in industrial democracies. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 279–297.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2014) Labor Force Statistics 2014. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- van der Meeer, T. and Dekker, P. (2011) Trustworthy states, trusting citizens? A multilevel study into objective and subjective determinants of political trust. In S. Zmerli and M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political Trust. Why Context Matters (pp. 95–116). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
- Verba, S., Scholzman, K. L. and Brady, H. E. (1995) Voice and equality. Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google Scholar