Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 461–478 | Cite as

Information effect on voter turnout: How campaign spending mobilises voters

  • Siim Trumm
  • Laura Sudulich
  • Joshua Townsley
Original Article

Abstract

We explore the impact of campaign effort on constituency-level turnout variation in Britain, under the premise that higher levels of campaign visibility stimulate electoral participation. We focus on the relationship between the competitiveness of the race and campaign effort as a provider of electoral information on the one hand, and voter turnout on the other hand. In doing so, we address the role of campaign effort and competitiveness in shaping turnout both independently as well as jointly. Further to this, we seek to add nuance to our understanding of how electoral campaigns mobilise voters by evaluating the comparative ability of different parties – based on whether or not they are ‘viable’ contenders in a particular constituency – to stimulate turnout. We find evidence that campaign effort mobilises voters and has a significant positive effect on voter turnout; this effect is independent from, and unconditioned by, the competitiveness of the race. However, we do find that this effect is mostly driven by the campaign effort of the ‘viable’ contenders in the constituency.

Keywords

campaigns electoral participation competitiveness campaign information Great Britain 

References

  1. Benoit, K. and Marsh, M. (2003) For a few euros more: Campaign spending effects in the Irish local elections of 1999. Party Politics 9(5): 561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benoit, K. and Marsh, M. (2008) The campaign value of incumbency: A New solution to the puzzle of less effective incumbent spending. American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 874–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benoit, K. and Marsh, M. (2010) Incumbent and challenger campaign spending effects in proportional electoral systems: The Irish elections of 2002. Political Research Quarterly 63(1): 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonneau, C. W. (2007) The effects of campaign spending in state supreme court elections. Political Research Quarterly 60(3): 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowler, S. and Farrell, D. M. (2011) Electoral institutions and campaigning in comparative perspective: Electioneering in European parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research 50(5): 668–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, R. G. and Palda, K. S. (1983) Electoral turnout in rational voting and consumption perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research 9: 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutts, D. and Fieldhouse, E. (2009) What small spatial scales are relevant as electoral contexts for individual voters? The importance of the household on turnout at the 2001 general election. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 726–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson, P. and Zinser, J. (1976) Political finance and participation in congressional elections. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 425(1):59–73.Google Scholar
  9. Denver, D. T. and Hands, H. T. G. (1974) Marginality and turnout in British general elections. British Journal of Political Science 4(1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denver, D. T. and Hands, H. T. G. (1997) Challengers, incumbents, and the impact of constituency campaigning in Britain. Electoral Studies 16(2): 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denver, D., Hands, H. T. G. and MacAllister, I. (2004) The electoral impact of constituency campaigning in Britain, 1992–2001. Political Studies 52(2): 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Fieldhouse, E. and Cutts, D. (2009) The effectiveness of local party campaigns in 2005: Combining evidence from campaign spending and agent survey data. British Journal of Political Science 39(2): 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, J. (1999) Party expenditure and electoral prospects: A national level analysis of Britain. Electoral Studies 18: 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, J. (2015) Party finance: The death of the national campaign? Parliamentary Affairs 68(1): 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, J., Cutts, D. and Fieldhouse, E. (2011) The electoral effectiveness of constituency campaigning in the 2010 British general election: The ‘Triumph’ of labour? Electoral Studies 30(4): 816–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, J. and Denver, D. (2009) Evaluating the electoral effects of traditional and modern modes of constituency campaigning in Britain 1992-2005. Parliamentary Affairs 62(2): 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, J., Fieldhouse, E., Johnston, R., Pattie, C. and Cutts, D. (2016) Is all campaigning equally positive? the impact of district level campaigning on voter turnout at the 2010 British general election. Party Politics 22(2): 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher, J., Johnston, R., Cutts, D., Pattie, C. and Fieldhouse, E. (2014) You get what you (don’t) pay for: The impact of volunteer labour and candidate spending at the 2010 British general election. Parliamentary Affairs 67(4): 804–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geys, B. (2006) Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate level research. Electoral Studies 25(4): 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, D. P. and Gerber, A. S. (2008) Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, B. C. and McAllister, I. (1996) Marketing politics to voters: Late deciders in the 1992 British election. European Journal of Marketing 30(10/11): 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hillygus, D. S. (2005) Campaign effects and the dynamics of turnout intention in election 2000. Journal of Politics 67(1): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. (1994) The impact of party spending on party constituency campaigns at recent British general elections. Party Politics 1(2): 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. (2006) Putting Voters in Their Place: Geography and Elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. (2008) How much does a vote cost? Incumbency and the impact of campaign spending at english general elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(2): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. (2011) Electoral systems, geography, and political behaviour: United Kingdom examples. In: B. Warf and J. Leib (eds.) Revitalizing Electoral Geography. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, pp. 31–58.Google Scholar
  28. Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C., Cutts, D., Fieldhouse, E. and Fisher, J. (2011) Local campaign spending at the 2010 general election and its impact: Exploring what wider regulation has revealed. The Political Quarterly 82(2): 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C. and Johnston, L. C. (1989) The impact of constituency spending on the result of the 1987 British General election. Electoral Studies 8(2): 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karp, J. A. and Banducci, S. A. (2007) Party mobilization and political participation in new and old democracies. Party Politics 13(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karp, J. A., Banducci, S. A. and Bowler, S. (2008) Getting out the vote: Party mobilization in a comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kavanagh, D. (1970) Constituency Electioneering in Britain. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  33. Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L. and Brown Rovner, I. (2007) The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maddens, B., Wauters, B., Noppe, J. and Fiers, S. (2006) Effects of campaign spending in an open list pr system: The 2003 legislative elections in Flanders/Belgium. West European Politics 29(1): 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matsusaka, J. G. and Palda, F. (1993) The downsian voter meets the ecological fallacy. Public Choice 77(4): 855–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pattie, C. and Johnston, R. (2011) A tale of sound and fury, significant something? The impact of the leaders’ debates in the 2010 UK general election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(2): 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pattie, C., Johnston, R. J. and Fieldhouse, E. (1995) Winning the local vote: The effectiveness of constituency campaign spending in Great Britain, 1983-1992. American Political Science Review 89(4): 969–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rallings, C. and Thrasher, M. (2007) The Media Guide to the New Parliamentary Constituencies. Plymouth: LGC Elections Centre.Google Scholar
  39. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S. and Brady, H. E. (2012). The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevens, D., Karp, J. A. and Hodgson, R. (2011) Party leaders as movers and shakers in british campaigns? Results from the 2010 Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(2): 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sudulich, L. and Wall, M. (2011) How do candidates spend their money? Objects of campaign spending and the effectiveness of diversification. Electoral Studies 30(2): 91–111.Google Scholar
  42. Wauters, B., Weekers, K. and Maddens, B. (2010) Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list pr system: An investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium). Acta Politica 45(4): 468–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. (1994) Local party campaigning and voting behaviour in Britain. Journal of Politics 56(1): 242–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wring, D. and Ward, S. (2010) The media and the 2010 Campaign: The television election? Parliamentary Affairs 63(4): 802–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siim Trumm
    • 1
  • Laura Sudulich
    • 2
  • Joshua Townsley
    • 2
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations