Skip to main content
Log in

Responsibility not to be silent: Academic knowledge production about the war against Ukraine and knowledge diplomacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the role that academics have played in knowledge production about Russia’s war against Ukraine. Focusing on Aotearoa New Zealand – a like-minded country with Ukraine but distant from it and with few historical links – we examine how many academics chose to engage with the war through their teaching, public outreach, and interactions with policymakers. We situate our analysis within the emerging literature on knowledge diplomacy, the ‘contribution that education and knowledge creation, sharing and use make to international relations and engagement’ (Knight in Int Higher Educ 80:8–9, 2015). Drawing on 20 in-depth interviews with academics across seven NZ universities and a range of disciplines, we show that academics who undertook the responsibility not to remain silent have become spontaneous contributors to knowledge diplomacy processes. In doing so, they have avoided its potential trap, namely to use knowledge for power-projections and manipulations. On the contrary, the reflections revealed how academics – as subject and objects in knowledge-production – exercise their independent self-motivated agency to ensure a two-way process: (1) to foster knowledge among students and various communities as a tool for better-informed, critically-approached international relations and (2) to use international relations developments to strengthen higher education tools and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Source: our own, based on engagement with the concepts introduced by Knight (2015, 2020).

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A subjective opinion by an interviewee. Timothy Snyder’s approach to nationalism was specifically mentioned by one of our respondents.

  2. Adding our perspective here, TikTok should not be delegitimised as a news source as Russia’s war against Ukraine has been extensively documented and covered on this platform. This platform has not been engineered to raise political awareness. Nonetheless, it has become a useful information source on domestic and international news.

References

  • Aberbach, Joel, Chesney, James, & Rockman, Bert (1975) ‘Exploring Elite Political Attitudes: Some Methodological Lessons’, Political Methodology 2(1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asada, Sarah (2021) ‘Study Abroad and Knowledge Diplomacy: Increasing Awareness and Connectivity to the Host Country, Host Region, and World’, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 51(4): 580–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand Finance (2022) Russia’s Soft Power Collapses Globally Following Invasion, Attitudes towards Ukraine Soar, available at https://brandfinance.com/press-releases/russias-soft-power-collapses-globally-following-invasion-attitudes-towards-ukraine-soar

  • Byrne, David (2022) ‘A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis’, Quality & Quantity 56(3): 1391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Jane (2015) ‘Moving from Soft Power to Knowledge Diplomacy’, International Higher Education 80: 8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Jane (2020) ‘Knowledge Diplomacy: What are the Key Characteristics’, International Higher Education 100: 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koval, Nadiia, Kulyk, Volodymyr, Riabchuk, Mykola, Zarembo, Kateryna, & Fakhurdinova, Marianna (2022) ‘Morphological Analysis of Narratives of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict in Western Academia and Think-Tank Community’, Problems of Post-Communism 69(2): 166–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, Patti (1986) ‘Research as Praxis’, Harvard Educational Review 56(3): 257-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinet, Luc (2010) ‘Universities and Knowledge Diplomacy’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2(5): 6772–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Sophie Hill who assisted us with various aspects of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Chaban.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaban, N., Headley, J. Responsibility not to be silent: Academic knowledge production about the war against Ukraine and knowledge diplomacy. J Int Relat Dev 26, 733–747 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00300-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00300-7

Keywords

Navigation