Skip to main content
Log in

Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existing scholarship in international relations (IR) has tended to underrate the conceptual implications of different types of shaming. This article advances a new terminology of shaming. Drawing from social and criminal psychology, the article distinguishes the social distancing effects of shaming that is disintegrative from the community-building effects of shaming that is reintegrative. This is important because it offers additional ways of seeing how it may be equally important to shed light on the multifaceted role and multiple effects of shaming in maintaining social order in world politics. The main argument raised here is that reintegrative shaming – shaming, which is followed by efforts to reintegrate the offender back into the community – is central to peaceful conflict resolution in a security community. This argument is empirically illustrated by the case of NATO’s military intervention in Libya.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Germany had already once ‘abandoned’ its NATO allies in order to side with countries such as Russia and China, namely during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. However, at the time France and Germany both opposed the invasion. the Libyan case marked the first time that Germany stood alone in not siding with its fellow transatlantic community members. This fact is particularly relevant to the argument at hand, since it significantly increased the effectiveness of reintegrative shaming against Germany (which could not build on the support from other deviant members, such as France and Belgium during the case of the Iraq war).

  2. The NATO Quint is informal decision-making group of the five NATO ambassadors from the US, the UK, France, Italy, and Germany.

References

List of interviews

  • Anonymous interview partner A, 11 January, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner B, 3 March, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner C, 5 March, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner D, 11 March, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner E, 18 March, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner F, 4 March, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner G, 17 March, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner H, 12 February, 2021.

  • Anonymous interview partner I, 5 March, 2021

  • Anonymous interview partner J, 3 March, 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Chiara Cervasio, Adrian Rogstad, Frank Stengel, Richard Sakwa, and the participants of panels at the ECPR in Hamburg 2018, EISA in Prague 2018, and ISA 2021 as well as two anonymous reviewers for extremely helpful feedback and suggestions. I would also like to thank my interview partners at NATO for sharing their valuable time and insights. Research for this study has been generously funded by the German Research Council (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Koschut.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koschut, S. Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya. J Int Relat Dev 25, 497–522 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00249-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00249-5

Keywords

Navigation