Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global informalism and the G20

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers efforts to improve the effectiveness of global governance by examining the nature and consequences of informal global governance by focusing upon the operation of the Group of 20 (G20). It does so by considering the relationship between the existing forms of global constitutionalism, which indicate a foundational role for rules and laws within the existing forms of multilateral global governance, with informal forms of global governance operating with respect to the G20. This is conducted by considering a constructivist understanding of diplomatic practices which operate to sustain international cooperation and better manage multilateral global governance. The article contends that informal global governance is animated by an underlying non-legal disposition of global informalism and is evident in various informal diplomatic practices in the operation of the G20. The article seeks to better comprehend the consequences of informal global governance and challenge the field of global constitutionalism by highlighting the important but problematic nature of non-legal and informal global practices in contemporary global governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, Emanuel (2005) Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel and Vincent Pouliot (2011) ‘International Practices’, International Theory 3(1): 1‒36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandroff, Alan and Donald Brean (2015) ‘Global Summitry: Its Meaning and Scope Part One’, Global Summitry 1(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, Nicholas (1995) ‘The G7 Summit and the Reform of Global Institutions’, Government and Opposition 30(4): 492–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, Ian (2012) Every Nation for Itself: Winners and Losers in a G-Zero World, New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggruen, Nicholas and Nathan Gardels (2012) Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way Between West and East, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Luis (2010) ‘World Government: Renewed Debate, Persistent Challenges’, European Journal of International Relations 16(3): 511‒30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew (2019) ‘Global Summitry as Sites of Transnational Technocratic Management and Policy Contestation’, in Kim Moloney and Dianne Stone, eds, The Oxford Handbook on Global Policy and Transnational Administration, 639‒55, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew (2012) The Group of Twenty: Input and Output Legitimacy, Reforms, and Agenda, Tokyo: Working Paper 372, Asian Development Bank Institute: 1‒28.

  • Cooper, Andrew (2010) ‘The G20 as an Improvised Crisis Committee and/or a Contested “Steering Committee” for the World’, International Affairs 86(3): 741–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew and Vincent Pouliot (2015) ‘How Much is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice’, Cooperation and Conflict 50(3): 334‒50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew and Ramesh Thakur (2013) The Group of Twenty (G20), New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew and Yanbing Zhang (2017) ‘Chinese Leadership in the Evolution of “Hub” and “Parallel” Globally Oriented Institutions’, Chinese Political Science Review 2(7): 1‒20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunoff, Jeffrey, Antje Wiener, Mattias Kumm, Anthony F. Lang Jr. and James Tully (2015) ‘Hard Times: Progress Narratives, Historical Contingency and the Fate of Global Constitutionalism’, Global Constitutionalism 4(1): 1‒17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunoff, Jeffrey and Joel Trachtman. (2009) ‘A Functional Approach to Global Constitutionalism’, in Jeffrey Dunoff and Joel Trachtman, eds, Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, 3-35, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccleston, Richard, Aynsley Kellow and Peter Carroll (2013) ‘G20 Endorsement in Post Crisis Global Governance: More Than a Toothless Talking Shop?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17(2): 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Fleur (2013) Non-Legality in International Law: Unruly Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahr Støre, Jonas (2010) ‘Norway Takes Aim at G20: “One of the Greatest Setbacks Since World War II”’, Der Spiegel (22 June).

  • G7 (1999) Statement of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, 25 September, available at https://www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm992509state.html (last accessed on 28 May, 2019).

  • G20 Research Group (2014) ‘G20 Summit Compliance Data Set: 2008 to 2013’, available at https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/compliance/dataset.html (last accessed on 28 May, 2019).

  • Hale, Thomas, David Held and Kevin Young. (2013) Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation is Failing When We Need it Most, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Ian (2011) ‘Law and the Practice of Diplomacy’, International Journal 66(3): 581‒96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles (2018) ‘Global Governance: Three Futures’, International Studies Review 20(2): 239–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles (1992) ‘Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers’, International Organization 46(3): 681‒708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, John (2013) G20 Governance for a Globalized World, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen (1985) Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumm, Mattias, Anthony Lang, James Tully and Antje Wiener (2014) ‘How Large is the World of Global Constitutionalism?’, Global Constitutionalism 3(1): 1‒8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Anthony, Mattias Kumm, Antje Wiener, James Tully and Miguel Poiares Maduro (2013) ‘Interdisciplinarity: Challenges and Opportunities?’, Global Constitutionalism 2/(1): 1‒5.

  • Latner, Richard (1978) ‘The Kitchen Cabinet and Andrew Jackson's Advisory System’, Journal of American History 65(2): 367‒88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John (1994) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security 19(3): 5‒49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Daniel and Matthew Fluck (2017) ‘The Concept of Transparency in International Relations: Towards a Critical Approach’, European Journal of International Relations 23(2): 416‒40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzen, Jennifer (2013) Power in Concert: The Nineteenth Century Origins of Global Governance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naím, Moises (2009) ‘Minilateralism, the Magic Number to Get Real International Action’, Foreign Policy Magazine (21 June).

  • Pisani-Ferry, Jean (2018) ‘Should We Give Up on Global Governance?’, Policy Contribution 2018/17, Bruegel.

  • Pouliot, Vincent (2012) ‘Methodology: Putting Practice Theory in Practice’, in Rebecca Adler-Nissen, ed., Bourdieu in International Relations, 45‒58, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, Vincent and Jérémie Cornut (2015) ‘Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda’, Cooperation and Conflict 50(3): 297‒315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games’, International Organization 42: 427–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, Charles (2016) Soft Governance: Why States Create Informal Intergovernmental Organizations and Why it Matters, PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.

  • Ruggie, John (1993) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwöbel, Christine (2010) ‘Situating the Debate on Global Constitutionalism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 8(3/1): 611–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl (1922/2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by George Schwab, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Slaughter, Steven (2020) The Power of the G20: The Politics of Legitimacy in Global Governance, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Steven, ed. (2019) The G20 and International Relations Theory: Perspectives on Global Summitry, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sopel, Jin (2017) ‘Trump Proves G20 is Less Than Sum of its Parts’, BBC News (9 July), available at https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40546617 (last accessed on 28 May, 2019).

  • Stone, Dianne (2015) ‘The Group of 20 Transnational Policy Community: Governance Networks, Policy Analysis and Think Tanks’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(4): 793‒811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooze, Adam (2018) ‘Globalization’s Government Turns 10’, Foreign Policy Magazine (19 November), available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/19/globalizations-government-turns-10/ (last accessed on 28 May, 2019).

  • UNGA (2009) ‘Outcome of the Conference on the World Financial and Economic Crisis and its Impact on Development’, A/RES/63/303.

  • Vabulas, Felicity (2019) ‘Transnational Administration in Informal International Organizations’, in Kim Moloney and Dianne Stone, eds, The Oxford Handbook on Global Policy and Transnational Administration, 402‒19, Oxford. Oxford University Press.

  • Vabulas, Felicity and Duncan Snidal (2013) ‘Organization without Delegation: Informal intergovernmental organizations (IIGOs)’, Review of International Organizations 8(2): 193‒220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vestergaard, Jakob and Robert Wade (2010) ‘Establishing a New Global Economic Council: Governance Reform at the G20, the IMF and the World Bank’, Global Policy 3(3): 257‒69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Michael and Stephen Krasner (1989) ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment’, Review of International Studies 15: 183–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Thomas (2009) ‘What Happened to the Idea of World Government?’, International Studies Quarterly 53(2): 253–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje, Anthony Lang, James Tully, Miguel Poiares Maduro and Mattias Kumm (2012) ‘Why a New Journal on Global Constitutionalism?’, Global Constitutionalism 1(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

    Steven Slaughter

Authors
  1. Steven Slaughter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Slaughter.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slaughter, S. Global informalism and the G20. J Int Relat Dev 24, 533–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00201-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00201-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation