Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Common knowledge? Business intellectuals, BRIC and the production of knowledge across global finance and international relations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article engages with the debate about how we come to know IR the way that we do. It seeks to contribute to this research agenda in two related ways. Firstly, it highlights the influence that a previously neglected circuit of practice has on the co-constituted knowledge relationship between global finance (GF) and International Relations (IR): the business intellectuals of cultural circuits of capital (CCC). Secondly, it argues that the science and technology studies’ concept of boundary objects is invaluable in accounting for both how IR’s ‘constitutive’ theorising is influenced by other circuits of practice and the co-constituted nature of ‘the international’ as an object of investigation. To exemplify both arguments, and how they relate to one another, the article traces the co-constituted operation of the concept of ‘BRIC’ (Brazil, Russia, India and China). Following the global financial crisis in 2007/2008, CCC popularised the concept of ‘BRIC’, which then came to operate as a boundary object between IR and GF and in the process impacted on how IR knows ‘rising powers’ and ‘global governance’. Thus, the functionality of BRIC as a boundary object served to provide business intellectuals with constitutive influence on how IR knows its object of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen, Rita and Michael C. Williams (2007) ‘Securing the City: Private Security Companies and Non-State Authority in Global Governance’, International Relations 21(2): 237–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel (1992) ‘The emergence of cooperation: national epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control’, International Organization 46(1): 101–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2011) ‘On a Field Trip with Bourdieu’, International Political Sociology 5(3): 327–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, Rob (2011) ‘Financializing security Political prediction markets and the commodification of uncertainty’, Security Dialogue 42(2): 123–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Mathias (2016) A Theory of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Mathias and Barry Buzan (2013) ‘International Relations Theory and the “Social Whole”: Encounters and Gaps Between IR and Sociology’, International Political Sociology 7(2): 117–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amicelle, Anthony (2011) ‘Towards a ‘new’ political anatomy of financial surveillance’, Security Dialogue 42(2): 161–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amicelle, Anthony, Claudia Aradau and Julien Jeandesboz (2015) ‘Questioning security devices: Performativity, resistance, politics’, Security Dialogue 46(4): 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, Louise and Marieke de Goede (2008) ‘Transactions after 9/11: the banal face of the preemptive strike’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33(2): 173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniades, Andreas (2003) ‘Epistemic Communities, Epistemes and the Construction of (World) Politics’, Global Society 17(1): 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, Claudia and Rens van Munster (2009) ‘Exceptionalism and the “War On Terror” Criminology Meets International Relations’, British Journal of Criminology 49(5): 686–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, Claudia and Rens van Munster (2007) ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu-Brossard, Philippe (2015) ‘Bypassing the reflexivity trap: IR’s disciplinary status and the politics of knowledge’, International Relations 29(2): 263–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellanova, Rocco and Gloria González Fuster (2013) ‘Politics of Disappearance: Scanners and (Unobserved) Bodies as Mediators of Security Practices’, International Political Sociology 7(2): 188–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenskoetter, Felix (2017) ‘Approaches to Concept Analysis’, Millennium 45(2): 151–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berling, Trine Villumsen (2012) ‘Bourdieu, International Relations, and European security’, Theory and Society 41(5): 451–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berling, Trine Villumsen and Christian Bueger (2013) ‘Practical Reflexivity and Political Science: Strategies for Relating Scholarship and Political Practice’, PS: Political Science & Politics 46(1): 115–19.

  • Bigo, Didier (2011) ‘Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power’, International Political Sociology 5(3): 225–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, Didier (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(1): S63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, Mike, Heather Johnson and Debbie Lisle (2015) ‘Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies’, Security Dialogue 46(4): 307–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Susan Leigh Star (2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boy, Nina (2015) ‘Sovereign safety’, Security Dialogue 46(6): 530–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boy, Nina, J. Peter Burgess and Anna Leander (2011) ‘The global governance of security and finance Introduction to the special issue’, Security Dialogue 42(2): 115–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brütsch, Christian and Mihaela Papa (2013) ‘Deconstructing the BRICS: Bargaining Coalition, Imagined Community, or Geopolitical Fad?’, Chinese Journal of International Politics 6(3): 299–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueger, Christian (2015) ‘Making Things Known: Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy’, International Political Sociology 9(1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueger, Christian and Felix Bethke (2014) ‘Actor-networking the “failed state” ‒ an enquiry into the life of concepts’, Journal of International Relations and Development 17(1): 30–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büger, Christian (2008) ‘Human Security – What’s the use of it? On boundary objects and the constitution of new global spaces’, 49th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Francisco.

  • Büger, Christian and Trine Villumsen (2007) ‘Beyond the gap: relevance, fields of practice and the securitizing consequences of (democratic peace) research’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10(4): 417–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, Sean W. (2015) ‘The BRICS and the future of global order. By Oliver Stuenkel’, International Affairs 91(4): 878–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, Mathew J. and Jennifer Harris (2009) ‘Revisiting the Future: Geopolitical Effects of the Financial Crisis’, Washington Quarterly 32(2): 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, Gregory T. (2014) ‘The BRICS-led Development Bank: Purpose and Politics beyond the G20’, Global Policy 5(3): 366–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew F. (2010) Labels matter: Interpreting rising powers through acronyms. In Rising states, rising institutions: Challenges for global governance, ed. Andrew F. Cooper and Alan S. Alexandroff. Waterloo: The Center for International Governance Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Michael (2012) ‘Power Shifts, Economic Change and the Decline of the West?’, International Relations 26(4): 369–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Mai’a K. Davis (2013) ‘Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later’, Review of International Studies 39(1): 137–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Goede, Marieke (2012) Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies, University of Minnesota Press.

  • De Goede, Marieke (2005) Virtue, Fortune, And Faith: A Geneaology Of Finance, University of Minnesota Press.

  • Dillon, Michael (2007) ‘Governing through contingency: The security of biopolitical governance’, Political Geography 26(1): 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, Christian (2015) ‘Global energy governance: do the BRICs have the energy to drive reform?’, International Affairs 91(4): 799–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, Stefan (2008) ‘Risking Lives: AIDS, Security and Three Concepts of Risk’, Security Dialogue 39(2–3): 177–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, Stefan (2006) ‘Should HIV/AIDS Be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Linking HIV/AIDS and Security’, International Studies Quarterly 50(1): 119–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbe, Stefan, Anne Roemer-Mahler and Christopher Long (2014) ‘Securing circulation pharmaceutically: Antiviral stockpiling and pandemic preparedness in the European Union’, Security Dialogue 45(5): 440–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Nick J. (2011) ‘Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies’, Sociology 45(1): 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, Stefano (2013) ‘The ends of International Relations theory: Stages of reflexivity and modes of theorizing’, European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 521–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Peter M. (1992) ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization 46(1): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann, Jonas and Myriam Dunn Cavelty (2012) ‘National risk registers: Security scientism and the propagation of permanent insecurity’, Security Dialogue 43(1): 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, Shahar and Lee Jones (2015) ‘Probing the links between political economy and non-traditional security: Themes, approaches and instruments’, International Politics 52(4): 371–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John and Thomas Wright (2008). ‘Rising Powers and Global Institutions’, A Century Foundation Report, New York: The Century Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iley, Richard A. and Mervyn K. Lewis (2011) ‘Has the global financial crisis produced a New World Order?’, Accounting Forum 35(2): 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ish-Shalom, Piki (2006) ‘Theory as a Hermeneutical Mechanism: The Democratic-Peace Thesis and the Politics of Democratization’, European Journal of International Relations 12(4): 565–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Oliver (2012) ‘World Society, Social Differentiation and Time’, International Political Sociology 6(1): 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Oliver (2011) ‘Beyond sectors, before the world Finance, security and risk’, Security Dialogue 42(2): 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahmann, Elke (2003) ‘Conceptualizing Security Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict 38(1): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, Peter M. (2012) ‘Dividing Discipline: Structures of Communication in International Relations’, International Studies Review 14(1): 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laïdi, Zaki (2012) ‘BRICS: Sovereignty power and weakness’, International Politics 49(5): 614–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Deborah Welch and Alexei Shevchenko (2010) ‘Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy’, International Security 34(4): 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, Christopher (2012) ‘This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana’, International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 203–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, Anna (2005) ‘The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies 33(3): 803–25.

  • Leander, Anna and Rens van Munster (2007) ‘Private Security Contractors in the Debate about Darfur: Reflecting and Reinforcing Neo-Liberal Governmentality’, International Relations 21(2): 201–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyshon, Andrew, Shaun French, Nigel Thrift, Louise Crewe and Peter Webb (2005) ‘Accounting for e-commerce: abstractions, virtualism and the cultural circuit of capital’, Economy and Society 34(3): 428–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, Mikael Rask (2011) ‘Reflexivity and the Construction of the International Object: The Case of Human Rights1’, International Political Sociology 5(3): 259–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastanduno, Michael (1998) ‘Economics and Security in Statecraft and Scholarship’, International Organization 52(4): 825–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, Dmitri (2010). ‘The BRIC summit has taken place April 16, 2010’, Official Website of the Russian President, available at http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/7475 (last accessed on 7 April, 2020).

  • Mérand, Frédéric (2010) ‘Pierre Bourdieu and the Birth of European Defense’, Security Studies 19(2): 342–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisio, Sami (2018) Geopolitics of the Knowledge-Based Economy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisio, Sami (2015) ‘Geopolitics/Critical Geopolitics’, in The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography, 220–34, Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Morris, Justin (2013) ‘Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum’, International Affairs 89(5): 1265–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Milton, Andreas Schmidt, and Brenden Kuerbis (2013) ‘Internet Security and Networked Governance in International Relations’, International Studies Review 15(1): 86–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, Mark (2006) ‘From Social to National Security: On the Fabrication of Economic Order’, Security Dialogue 37(3): 363–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Jim (2001). ‘Building Better Global Economic BRICs’, Global Economics Paper No. 66, available at https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf (last accessed on 7 April, 2020).

  • Oels, Angela (2013) ‘Rendering climate change governable by risk: From probability to contingency’, Geoforum 45: 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, Harsh V. (2013) ‘The BRICS Fallacy’, Washington Quarterly 36(3): 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Tony (2012) ‘Making serious measures: numerical indices, peer review, and transnational actor-networks’, Journal of International Relations and Development 15(4): 532–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, Jason and Adrian Gallagher (2015) ‘Legitimacy faultlines in international society: The responsibility to protect and prosecute after Libya’, Review of International Studies 41(3): 553–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Cynthia (2009) ‘Russia’s BRICs Diplomacy: Rising Outsider with Dreams of an Insider’, Polity 42(1): 38–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin (2016) ‘International Relations in the prison of Political Science’, International Relations 30(2): 127–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, Nouriel (2009) ‘Another BRIC in the Wall?’, Project Syndicate, available at http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/another-bric-in-the-wall (last accessed on 24 July, 2015).

  • Salter, Mark B. (2008) ‘Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security’, Security Dialogue 39(2–3): 243–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, Peer (2014) ‘Security as controversy: Reassembling security at Amsterdam Airport’, Security Dialogue 45(1): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sending, Ole Jacob and Iver B. Neumann (2006) ‘Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power’, International Studies Quarterly 50(3): 651–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, Martin and Christoph Elhardt (2013) ‘Bourdieu and the bomb: Power, language, and the doxic battle over the value of nuclear weapons’, European Journal of International Relations 20(2): 316–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil, Rudra (2014) ‘Which of the BRICs Will Wield the Most Influence in Twenty-Five Years? Russia Reconsidered’, International Studies Review 16(3): 456–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2004) A New World Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh (2010) ‘This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept’, Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(5): 601–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, Matthew D. (2014) ‘Rising regional powers and international institutions: the foreign policy orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa’, Global Society 26(3): 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stritzel, Holger (2012) ‘Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime’, Security Dialogue 43(6): 549–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, Oliver (2011) ‘Identity and the concept of the West: the case of Brazil and India’, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 54(1): 178–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, Oliver (2013) ‘The Financial Crisis, Contested Legitimacy, and the Genesis of Intra-BRICS Cooperation’, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 19(4): 611–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subacchi, Paola (2008) ‘New power centers and new power brokers: are they shaping a new economic order?’, International Affairs 84(3): 485–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sum, Ngai-Ling (2013) ‘A cultural political economy of crisis recovery: (trans-)national imaginaries of “BRIC” and subaltern groups in China’, Economy and Society 42(4): 543–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, Gillian (2010) ‘The story of the Brics’. Financial Times, 15 January.

  • Thakur, Ramesh and Andrew F. Cooper (2014) The BRICS in the New Global Economic Geography, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel (2005) Knowing Capitalism, London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, Michael J. (2014) ‘Rising Powers and the Regime for Development Finance’, International Studies Review 16(3): 452–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jeremy and Melinda Cooper (2011) ‘Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation’, Security Dialogue 42(2): 143–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William (2014) ‘Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security’, Security Dialogue 45(2): 101–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansleben, Leon (2013) ‘“Dreaming with BRICs”’, Journal of Cultural Economy 6(4): 453–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Dominic and Roopa Purushothama (2003). ‘Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050’, Global Economics Paper No. 99, available at https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/archive/archive-pdfs/brics-dream.pdf (last accessed on 7 April, 2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

A part of the work on this article was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, as part of the funded project: “Which region? The politics of the UN Security Council P5 in international security crises” (SNF Project Number: 162925).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Environment, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Stephen Aris

  2. School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES), University College London (UCL), London, UK

    Aglaya Snetkov

Authors
  1. Stephen Aris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aglaya Snetkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Aris.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aris, S., Snetkov, A. Common knowledge? Business intellectuals, BRIC and the production of knowledge across global finance and international relations. J Int Relat Dev 24, 333–355 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00193-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00193-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation