Social movements and international relations: a relational framework

Abstract

Social movements are increasingly recognised as significant features of contemporary world politics, yet to date their treatment in international relations theory has tended to obfuscate the considerable diversity of these social formations, and the variegated interactions they may establish with state actors and different structures of world order. Highlighting the difficulties conventional liberal and critical approaches have in transcending conceptions of movements as moral entities, the article draws from two underexploited literatures in the study of social movements in international relations, the English School and social systems theory, to specify a wider range of analytical interactions between different categories of social movements and of world political structures. Moreover, by casting social movement phenomena as communications, the article opens international relations to consideration of the increasingly diverse trajectories and second order effects produced by social movements as they interact with states, intergovernmental institutions, and transnational actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Adler, Emanuel. and Vincent Pouliot (2011) ‘International practices’, International Theory3(1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albert, Mathias. and Barry Buzan (2013) ‘International Relations Theory and the “Social Whole”: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology’, International Political Sociology7(2): 115–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert, Mathias., Oliver Kessler and Stephan Stetter (2008) ‘On Order and Conflict: International Relations and the “communicative turn”’, Review of International Studies34(S1): 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alger, Chadwick (1997) ‘Transnational Social Movements, World Politics, and Global Governance’, in Jackie Smith, Charles Chatfield and Ron Pagnucco, eds, Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics, 260–78, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amenta, Edwin, Neil Caren, Elizabeth Chiarello et al. (2010) ‘The Political Consequences of Social Movements’, Annual Review of Sociology36: 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen, Morten (2015) ‘How to study NGOs in practice: A relational primer’, in William DeMars and Dennis Dijkzeul, eds, The NGO Challenge for International Relations Theory, 41–60, Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong, David (1992) Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arts, Bas (2000) ‘Regimes, Non-State Actors and the State System: A “Structurational” Regime Model’, European Journal of International Relations6(4): 513–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Badruddin (2003) Global Peace and Anti-nuclear Movements, New Delhi: Mittal.

  10. Barry, Andrew (2013) ‘The Translation Zone: Between Actor-Network Theory and International Relations’, Millennium41(3): 413–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beissinger, Mark (2017) ‘“Conventional” and “Virtual” Civil Societies in Autocratic Regimes’, Comparative Politics49(3): 351–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beissinger, Mark (2013) ‘The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution’, American Political Science Review107(3): 574–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benford, Robert and Daniel Snow (2000) ‘Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett, Scott and Charles Howlett, eds (2014) Antiwar Dissent and Peace Activism in World War I America: A Documentary Reader, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett, W. Lance (2012) ‘The Personalization of Politics’, in D. V. Shah, L. A. Friedland, C. Wells et al., eds, ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science644(1): 20–39.

  16. Bennett, W. Lance and Alexandra Sagerberg (2013) The Logic of Connective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett, W. Lance, Alexandra Segerberg and Shawn Walker (2014) ‘Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests’, Information, Communication & Society17(2): 232–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blee, Kathleen. (2002) Inside Organized Racism: Women in the Hate Movement, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blühdorn, Ingolfur (2007) ‘Self-description, Self-deception, Simulation: A Systems-theoretical Perspective on Contemporary Discourses of Radical Change’, Social Movement Studies6(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blühdorn, Ingolfur (1999) ‘Beyond criticism and crisis: On the postcritical challenge of Niklas Luhmann’, Debatte7(2): 185–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bob, Clifford (2012) The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bolton, Matthew and Thomas Nash (2010) ‘The Role of Middle Power–NGO Coalitions in Global Policy: The Case of the Cluster Munitions Ban’, Global Policy1(2): 172–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bueger, Christian (2015) ‘Making Things Known: Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy’, International Political Sociology9(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bull, Hendley (1966) ‘International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach’, World Politics18(3): 361–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Busby, Joshua. (2010) Moral Movements and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Busby, Joshua and Kelly Greenhill (2015) ‘Ain’t that a Shame? Hypocrisy, Punishment, and Weak Actor Influence in International Politics, in H. Richard Friman, The Politics of Leverage in International Relations, 105–22, London: Palgrave.

  27. Buzan, Barry (2004) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buzan, Barry (2010) ‘The English School as a New Systems Theory of World Politics’, in Mathias. Albert, Lars. Cederman and Alexander Wendt, eds, New Systems Theories of World Politics, 195–219, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  29. Buzan, Barry (2018) ‘Revisiting world society’, International Politics55(1): 125–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Buzan, Barry and Mathias Albert (2010) ‘Differentiation: A sociological approach to international relations theory’, European Journal of International Relations16(3): 315–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Buzan, Barry and George Lawson (2015) The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Calhoun, Craig (2013) ‘Occupy Wall Street in perspective’, British Journal of Sociology64(1): 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Castells, Manuel (2015) Networks of Outrage and Hope, Second, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Castells, Manuel (2008) ‘The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance’, ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science616(1): 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ceadel, Martin (1987) Thinking about Peace and War, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ceadel, Martin (2000) Semi-Detached Idealists: The British Peace Movement and International Relations, 1854‒1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chandler, David (2004) Constructing Global Civil Society: Morality and Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Weiss, Jessica (2013) ‘Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China’, International Organization67(1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Clark, Ian (2007) International Legitimacy and World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cobban, Alfred (1969) The Nation State and National Self-Determination, London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cohen, Jean and Andrew Arato (1992) ‘Politics and the Reconstruction of the Concept of Civil Society’, in Axel Honneth, Thomas. McCarthy and Claus Offe et al., eds, Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, 121‒44, Cambridge: MIT Press.

  42. Colás, Alejandro. (2002) International Civil Society: Social Movements in World Politics, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cooley, Alexander and James Ron (2002) ‘The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action’, International Security27(1): 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Copsey, Nigel (2016) ‘Crossing borders: Anti-fascist Action (UK) and transnational anti-fascist militancy in the 1990s’, Contemporary European History25(4): 707–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Cutler, A. Claire (2001) ‘Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: a crisis of legitimacy’, Review of International Studies27(2): 133–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Davies, Thomas (2014) ‘The failure of strategic nonviolent action in Bahrain, Egypt, Libya and Syria: “political ju-jitsu” in reverse’, Global Change, Peace & Security26(3): 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Davies, Thomas, Holly. Eva Ryan and Alejandro M. Peña (2016) ‘Protest, Social Movements and Global Democracy since 2011: New Perspectives’, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change39: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Della Porta, Donatella. (1995) Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis Of Italy and Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Diani, Mario. (2003) ‘Social Movements, Contentious Actions, and Social Networks: “From Metaphor to Substance”?’, in Mario Diani and Doug McAdam, eds, Social Movements and Networks, 1–20, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Drengson, Alan and Yuichi Inoue, eds (1995) The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Drezner, Daniel (2007) All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dunford, Robin (2017) ‘Peasant activism and the rise of food sovereignty: Decolonising and democratising norm diffusion’, European Journal of International Relations23(1): 146–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dunford, Robin (2015) ‘Human rights and collective emancipation: The politics of food sovereignty’, Review of International Studies41(2): 239–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dupuy, Kendra E., James Ron and Aseem Prakash (2015) ‘Who survived? Ethiopia’s regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs’, Review of International Political Economy22(2): 419–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Duque, Marina (2018) ‘Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach’, International Studies Quarterly. DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqy001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Early, Frances (1995) ‘Revolutionary Pacificism and War Resistance: Jessie Wallace Hughan’s “War against War”’, Peace & Change20(3): 307–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Eley, Geoff (1991) Reshaping the German Right: Radical Nationalism and Political Change After Bismarck, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Eschle, Catherine (2001) Global Democracy, Social Movements, and Feminism, Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Eschle, Catherine and Bice Maiguashca (2007) ‘Rethinking Globalised Resistance: Feminist Activism and Critical Theorising in International Relations’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations9(2): 284–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Escobar, Arturo (2004) ‘Beyond the Third World: imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements’, Third World Quarterly25(1): 207–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ferguson, Yalre and Richard Mansbach (2004) Remapping global politics: History’s revenge and future shock, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (2001) ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science4(1): 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Fraser, Nancy (2014) ‘Transnationalizing the Public Sphere’, in N. Fraser, ed., Transnationalizing the Public Sphere, 8-42, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Fuchs, Christian (2014) OccupyMedia!: The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism, Alresford: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gerbaudo, Paolo (2017) The Mask and the Flag: Populism, Citizenism, and Global Protest, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Germain, Randall and Michael Kenny (2005) ‘The idea(l) of global civil society’, in Randall Germain and Michael Kenny, eds, The Idea of Global Civil Society: Ethics and Politics in a Globalizing Era, 1–16, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Giugni, Marco (1998) ‘Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements’, Annual Review of Sociology24: 371–93.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Glasius, Marlies and Geoffriey Pleyers (2013) ‘The Global Moment of 2011: Democracy, Social Justice and Dignity’, Development and Change44(3): 547–67. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Goodwin, Jeff (2001) No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945‒1991, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gunitsky, Seva (2014) ‘From the Spring of Nations to the Arab Spring: Building Better Typologies of Democratic Diffusion’, American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting: 1–34. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2299195.

  71. Guzzini, Stefano. (2004) ‘Constructivism and International Relations: an analysis of Luhmann’s conceptualization of power’, in Mathias Albert and Lena Hilkermeir, eds, Observing International Relations: Niklas Luhmann and World Politics, 208-222, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Heller, Regina and Martin Kahl (2013) ‘Tracing and Understanding “Bad” Norm Dynamics in Counterterrorism: The Current Debates in IR Research’, Critical Studies in Terrorism6(3): 414–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hermann, Tamar (1992) ‘Contemporary peace movements: Between the hammer of political realism and the anvil of pacifism’, Western Political Quarterly45(4): 869–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Jackson, Patrick T. and Daniel Nexon (1999) ‘Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations5(3): 291–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Joachim, Jutta. (2003) ‘Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights’, International Studies Quarterly47(2): 247–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Johnston, Alastair (2001) ‘Treating International Institutions as Social Environments’, International Studies Quarterly45(4): 487–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Juris, Jeffrey (2004) ‘Networked Social Movements: Global Movements for Global Justice’, in M. Castells, ed., The Network Society: A cross-cultural perspective, 341‒62, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kapstein, Ethan B. and Joshua Busby (2016) ‘Social Movements and Market Transformations: Lessons From HIV/AIDS and Climate Change’, International Studies Quarterly60(2): 317–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kavada, Anastasia (2012) ‘Engagement, bonding, and identity across multiple platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace’, MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research28(52): 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Khagram, Sanjeev, James Riker and Kathryn Sikkink, eds (2002) Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  82. King, Michael and Chris Thornhill (2003) Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kitschelt, Herbert (2006) ‘Movement Parties’, in Richard Katz and William Crotty, eds, Handbook of Party Politics, 278–90, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Knodt, Eva (1994) ‘Toward a non-foundationalist epistemology: the Habermas/Luhmann controversy revisited’, New German Critique61(Special Issue on Niklas Luhmann): 77–100.

  85. Kostovicova, Denisa and Marlies Glasius, eds (2011) Bottom-Up Politics: An Agency-Centred Approach to Globalisation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Krastev, Ivan (2014) Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kriesi, Hanspeter. (2014) ‘The Populist Challenge’, West European Politics37(2): 361–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Legro, Jeffrey and Andrew Moravcsik (1999) ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’, International Security24(2): 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Little, Richard (1995) ‘Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment’, European Journal of International Relations1(1): 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Luhmann, Niklas (1994) ‘The Modernity of Science’, New German Critique61: 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Luhmann, Niklas. (1995) Social systems, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Luhmann, Niklas (2008) ‘Are There Still Indispensable Norms in Our Society?’, Soziale Systeme1: 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Luhmann, Niklas (2013) Theory of Society – Volume 2, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lynch, Marc (2011) ‘After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State’, Perspectives on Politics9(2): 301–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Marchetti, Raffaele. (2017) ‘Global Civil Society’, in Stephen McGlinchey, ed., International Relations, 78–86, Bristol: E-International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  96. McCourt, David (2016) ‘Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism’, International Studies Quarterly60(3): 475–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. McKeown, Ryder (2009) ‘Norm Regress: US Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm’, European Journal of International Relations23(1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. McKoy, Michael and Michael Miller (2012) ‘The Patron’s Dilemma: The Dynamics of Foreign-Supported Democratization’, Journal of Conflict Resolution56(5): 904–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Miller, Michael, Michael Joseph and Dorothy Ohl (2018) ‘Are Coups Really Contagious? An Extreme Bounds Analysis of Political Diffusion’, Journal of Conflict Resolution62(2): 410–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Morphet, Sally (1996) ‘NGOs and the Environment’, in Peter Willetts, ed., The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non-governmental Organisations in the UN System, 116–46, London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Nagel, Thomas (2005) ‘The problem of global justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs33(2): 113–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Navari, Cornelia (2018) ‘Two roads to world society: Meyer’s “world polity” and Buzan’s “world society”’, International Politics55(1): 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Navari, Cornelia (2009) ‘Methods and Methology in the English School’, in Cornelia Navari, ed., Theorising International Society, 1–20, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Nelsen, Arthur (2014) French National Front launches nationalist environmental movement, December 18th, The Guardian, London.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Nexon, Daniel (2010) ‘Relationism and New Systems Theory’, in Mathias Albert, Lars Cederman and Alexander Wendt, eds, New Systems Theories of World Politics, 99–126, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Panke, Diana and Ulrich Petersohn (2012) ‘Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes’, European Journal of International Relations18(4): 719–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Peña, Alejandro M. (2015) ‘Governing differentiation: On standardisation as political steering’, European Journal of International Relations21(1): 52–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Petras, James and Henry Veltmeyer (2011) Social Movements in Latin America: Neoliberalism and Popular resistance, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Polyakova, Alina (2014) ‘Strange Bedfellows: Putin and Europe’s Far Right’, World Affairs177(3): 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Prakash, Aseem and Mary K. Gugerty (2010) ‘Conclusions and future research: rethinking advocacy organizations’, in Aseem Prakash and Mary K. Gugerty, eds, Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, pagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Price, Richard (2008) ‘Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics’, International Organization62(2): 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Price, Richard (2003) ‘Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics’, World Politics55(4): 579–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Price, Richard (1998) ‘Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines’, International Organization52(3): 613–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Qin, Yaqing (2016) ‘A Relational Theory of World Politics’, International Studies Review18(1): 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Rasch, William (1991) ‘Theories of complexity, complexities of theory: Habermas, Luhmann, and the study of social systems’, German Studies Review14(1): 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Ray, Larruy (1993) Rethinking Critical Theory: Emancipation in the Age of Global Social Movements, London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Read, Róisín, Bertrand Taithe and Roger Mac Ginty (2016) ‘Data hubris? Humanitarian information systems and the mirage of technology’, Third World Quarterly37(8): 1314–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Risse, Thomas and Kathryn Sikkink (1999) ‘The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction’, in Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink, eds, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, 1–38, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Rucht, Dieter. (2018) ‘Mobilization Against Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Germany: A Social Movement Perspective’. in Sieglinde Rosenberger, Verena Stern and Nina Merhaut, eds, Protest Movements in Asylum and Deportation, 225–45, Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Ruggie, John (2004) ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain - Issues, Actors, and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations10(4): 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Rupert, Mark (2003) ‘Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance’, Review of International Studies29(S1): 181–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Sell, Susan and Aseem Prakash (2004) ‘Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights’, International Studies Quarterly48(1): 143–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Sevenans, Julie, Stefaan Walgrave and Gwendolyn. Epping (2016) ‘How Political Elites Process Information From the News: The Cognitive Mechanisms Behind Behavioral Political Agenda-Setting Effects’, Political Communication33(4): 605–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Shannon, Megan, Clayton Thyne, Sarah Hayden et al. (2015) ‘The International Community’s Reaction to Coups’, Foreign Policy Analysis11(4): 363–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Smith, Jackie (2008) Social Movements for Global Democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Snow, David (2004) ‘Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields’, in D. Snow, S. Soule and H. Kriesi, eds, The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 380–412, Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Snyder, Louis (1984) Macro-Nationalisms: A History of the Pan-Movement, Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Solingen, Etel (2012) ‘Of Dominoes and Firewalls: The Domestic, Regional, and Global Politics of International Diffusion’, International Studies Quarterly56(4): 631–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Stephan, Maria and Erica Chenoweth (2008) ‘Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Non-Violent Conflict’, International Security33(1): 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Stroikos, Dimitrios (2018) ‘Engineering world society? Scientists, internationalism, and the advent of the Space Age’, International Politics55(1): 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Tarrow, Sydney (2011a) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Tarrow, Sydney (2011b) Why Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left, Foreign Affairs.

  133. Tarrow, Sydney (2001) ‘Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science4(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Tilly, Charles (2004) Social Movements, 1768‒2004, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Usherwood, Simon and Nick Startin (2013) ‘Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon’, Journal of Common Market Studies51(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Van Dyke, Nella and Bryan Amos (2017) ‘Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success’, Social Compass11(7): 1–17. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Vertigans, Stephen (2008) Terrorism and Societies, Aldershot: Aldgate.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Voss, Kim and Michelle Williams (2012) ‘The local in the global: rethinking social movements in the new millennium’, Democratization19(2): 352–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Wapner Paul and Anne Kantel (2017) Global Civil Society. In: Durant Robert Fiorino Daniel, and O’Leary Rosemary (eds) Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Weiss, Holger, ed. (2017) International Communism and Transnational Solidarity: Radical Networks, Mass Movements and Global Politics, 1919–1939, Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Wendt, Alexander (1995) ‘Constructing International Politics’, International Security20(1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. West, David (2013) Social movements in global politics, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Weyland, Kurt (2012) ‘The Arab Spring: Why the Surprising Similarities with the Revolutionary Wave of 1848?’, Perspectives on Politics10(4): 917–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Whitaker, F. (2004) ‘The WSF as Open Space’, in Jai Sen, Anita Anand, Arturo Escobar et al., eds, World Social Forum: Challenging Empires, 210-217, New Delhi: Viveka Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Wight, Martin (1992) International Theory: The Three Traditions, , New York: Holmes & Meir.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Wiktorowicz, Quintan and Karl Kaltenthaler (2016) ‘The Rationality of Radical Islam’, Political Science Quarterly131(2): 421–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Williams, John (2005) ‘Pluralism, Solidarism and the Emergence of World Society in English School Theory’, International Relations19(1): 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Wouters, Ruud and Stefaan Walgrave (2017) ‘Demonstrating Power’, American Sociological Review82(2): 361–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Zürn, Michael., Barry Buzan and Mathias Albert (2013) ‘Conclusion: Differentiation Theory and World Politics’, in Mathias Albert, Barry Buzan and Michael Zürn, eds, Bringing Sociology to International Relations, 228-245, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all JIRD reviewers, who provided insightful, constructive, and detailed comments on previous versions of this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro M. Peña.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davies, T.R., Peña, A.M. Social movements and international relations: a relational framework. J Int Relat Dev (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-019-00180-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • English School
  • Ideology
  • International relations theory
  • Social movements
  • Systems theory