Paradigmatic or critical? Resilience as a new turn in EU governance for the neighbourhood

Abstract

Rising from the margins of EU aid documents, resilience became a centrepiece of the 2016 EU Global Security Strategy, especially in relation to the neighbourhood. While new resilience-thinking may signify another paradigmatic shift in EU modus operandi, the question that emerges is whether it is critical enough to render EU governance a new turn, to make it sustainable? This article argues that in order for resilience-framed governance to become more effective, the EU needs not just engage with ‘the local’ by way of externally enabling their communal capacity. More crucially, the EU needs to understand resilience for what it is—a self-governing project—to allow ‘the local’ an opportunity to grow their own critical infrastructures and collective agency, in their pursuit of ‘good life’. Is the EU ready for this new thinking, and not just rhetorically or even methodologically when creating new instruments and subjectivities? The bigger question is whether the EU is prepared to critically turn the corner of its neoliberal agenda to accommodate emergent collective rationalities of self-governance as a key to make its peace-building project more successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more discussion on neo-liberal governance and its vulnerabilities see Reid and Chandler (2016) The Neoliberal Subject: Resilience, Adaptation and Vulnerability. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

  2. 2.

    This is particularly instructive, as Sect. “Resilience’s many ontological meanings: problematising the unsaid” of this article demonstrates when exploring the meaning of ‘resilience strategy’ for the EU: while there is an increasing emphasis on local ownership in the EU ‘resilience paradigm’, the former is delimited to approving the EU vision for transformation and change, rather than developing a truly autonomous and more sustainable local governance.

  3. 3.

    Discussion of resilience in the context of authoritarian or non-democratic regimes is particularly important, because resilience, as a theory of self-governance, is focused on capacity-building of the existing critical infrastructures. Their identification and differentiation from the structures that support and reproduce non-democratic regimes would be critical for societal and state resilience-building. This discussion however goes beyond the scope of this article, and will be developed elsewhere.

References

  1. Biermann, M., K. Hillmer-Pegram, C.N. Knapp, and R.E. Hum. 2016. ‘Approaching a Critical Turn? A Content Analysis of the Politics of Resilience in Key Bodies of Resilience Literature’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 4 (2): 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourbeau, P. 2013. ‘Resiliencism: Premises and Promises in Securitisation Research’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourbeau, P. 2018. A Genealogy of Resilience in World Politics. International Political Sociology 12 (1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourbeau, P., and C. Ryan. 2017. ‘Resilience, Resistance, Infrapolitics and Enmeshment’. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117692031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandler, D. 2014. ‘Beyond Neoliberalism: Resilience, the New Art of Governing Complexity’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 2 (1): 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chandler, D. 2015. Resilience and the “Everyday”: Beyond the Paradox of “Liberal Peace”. Review of International Studies 41: 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chandler, D., and J. Coaffee (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corry, O. 2014. From Defense to Resilience: Environmental Security beyond Neo-Liberalism. International Political Sociology 8: 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edkins, J. 1999. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. London: Lynne Rienners Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission. 2012. The EU Approach to Resilience: Learning from Food Security Crises. COM 586 final. Brussels, 3 October.

  11. European Commission. 2013. Action Plan for Resilience in Crisis Prone Countries 20132020. SWD 227 final. Brussels, 19 June.

  12. European Commission. 2014a. EU Resilience Compendium: Saving Lives and Livelihoods. Brussels, April. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/policies/resilience/eu_resilience_compendium_en.pdf.

  13. European Commission. 2014b. Resilience Marker: A General Guide. Brussels, November.

  14. European Commission. 2015a. Towards a New European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN 6 final. Brussels, 4 March.

  15. European Commission. 2015b. Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN 50 final. Brussels, 18 November.

  16. European Commission. 2016. Eastern PartnershipFocusing on Key Priorities and Deliverables. SWD 467 final. Brussels 15 December.

  17. European External Action Service (EEAS). 2016 Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels, June. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.

  18. European External Action Service (EEAS). 2017 EAP: Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Armenia (CEPA). https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eng_cepa_factsheet_armenia_digital.pdf.

  19. Fisher Onar, N., and K. Nicolaidis. 2013. The Decentering Agenda: Europe as a Post-Colonial Power. Conflict and Cooperation, Special Issue 48 (2): 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fleming, J. and Ledogar, R. 2008. ‘Resilience, an Evolving Concept: A Review of Literature Relevant to Aboriginal Research’, Pimatisiwin, Summer 6(2): 7–23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956753/.

  21. Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 197778. In ed. M. Senellart; tr. by G. Burchell).

  22. Henökl, T. (2018) ‘The European Neighbourhood Policy and the CFSP/CSDP: from the European Security Strategy to Global Strategy’, A. Marchetti, T. Demmelhuber, T., and Schumacher, T. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, Ch.46. London: Routledge.

  23. Joseph, J. 2013. ‘Resilience as Embedded Neoliberalism: A Governmentality Approach’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Joseph, J. 2016. Governing Through Failure and Denial: The New Resilience Agenda. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (3): 370–390.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Juncos, A. 2017. Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: A Pragmatic Turn? European Security 26 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kaufmann, M. 2013. ‘Emergent Self-Organisation in Emergencies: Resilience Rationalities in Interconnected Societies’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kelley, J. 2006. New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New ENP. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Korosteleva, E. 2012. The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbours: Towards a More Ambitious Partnership?. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Korosteleva, E. 2017. The Eastern Partnership: Bringing the Political Back In. East European Politics 33 (3): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Korosteleva, E. 2018. ‘The Challenges of the Eastern Neighbourhood’, in A. Marchetti, T. Demmelhuber, T., and Schumacher, T. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, Ch.15. London: Routledge.

  31. Korosteleva, E., M. Natorski, and L. Simão (eds.). 2014. EU Policies in the Eastern Neighbourhood: The Practices Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kurki, M. 2011. ’Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion’. International Political Sociology 5: 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lavenex, S. 2004. EU External Governance in “Wider Europe”. Journal of Public Policy 11 (4): 680–700.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lavenex, S. 2016. On the Fringes of the European Peace Project: The Neighbourhood Policy’s functionalist Hubris and Political Myopia. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116685261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lundborg, T., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2011. Resilience, Critical Infrastructure, and Molecular Security: The Excess of “Life” in Biopolitics”. International Political Sociology 5: 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mavelli, L. 2016. Governing the Resilience of Neoliberalism Through Biopolitics. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116676321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Raik, K. 2006. The EU as a Regional Power: Extended Governance and Historical Responsibility. In A Responsible Europe? Ethical Foundations of EU External Affairs, ed. H. Mayer and H. Vogt, 76–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Reid, J., and D. Chandler. 2016. The Neoliberal Subject. Resilience, Adaptation and Vulnerability. London: Row man and Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rutazibwa, O. 2014. Studying Agaciro: Moving Beyond Wilsonian Interventionist Knowledge Production on Rwanda. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 8 (4): 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sadiki, L. 2016. The Arab Spring: The “People” in International Relations. In International Relations of the Middle East, ed. L. Fawcett, 325–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schmidt, J. 2015. Intuitively Neoliberal? Towards a Critical Understanding of Resilience Governance. European Journal of International Relations 21 (2): 402–426.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Walker, J., and M. Cooper. 2011. Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation. Security Dialogue 42 (2): 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wagner, W., and R. Anholt. 2016. Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s New Leitmotif: Pragmatic, Problematic or Promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wolczuk, K. 2009. Implementation Without Coordination: The Impact of the EU Conditionality on Ukraine Under the European Neighbourhood Policy. Europe-Asia Studies 61 (2): 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zebrowski, C. 2013. ‘The Nature of Resilience’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (3): 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the anonymous referees, and the JIRD editors for their constructive feedback on the earlier versions of this paper.

Funding

This project was supported by the EU Horizon 2020 UPTAKE project [Grant No 691818] and GCRF RCUK COMPASS project, 2017-21 (ES/PO10849/1).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena A. Korosteleva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korosteleva, E.A. Paradigmatic or critical? Resilience as a new turn in EU governance for the neighbourhood. J Int Relat Dev 23, 682–700 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0155-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • European Union
  • Resilience-thinking
  • Governance
  • Self-governance
  • Eastern neighbourhood