Rising from the margins of EU aid documents, resilience became a centrepiece of the 2016 EU Global Security Strategy, especially in relation to the neighbourhood. While new resilience-thinking may signify another paradigmatic shift in EU modus operandi, the question that emerges is whether it is critical enough to render EU governance a new turn, to make it sustainable? This article argues that in order for resilience-framed governance to become more effective, the EU needs not just engage with ‘the local’ by way of externally enabling their communal capacity. More crucially, the EU needs to understand resilience for what it is—a self-governing project—to allow ‘the local’ an opportunity to grow their own critical infrastructures and collective agency, in their pursuit of ‘good life’. Is the EU ready for this new thinking, and not just rhetorically or even methodologically when creating new instruments and subjectivities? The bigger question is whether the EU is prepared to critically turn the corner of its neoliberal agenda to accommodate emergent collective rationalities of self-governance as a key to make its peace-building project more successful.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
For more discussion on neo-liberal governance and its vulnerabilities see Reid and Chandler (2016) The Neoliberal Subject: Resilience, Adaptation and Vulnerability. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
This is particularly instructive, as Sect. “Resilience’s many ontological meanings: problematising the unsaid” of this article demonstrates when exploring the meaning of ‘resilience strategy’ for the EU: while there is an increasing emphasis on local ownership in the EU ‘resilience paradigm’, the former is delimited to approving the EU vision for transformation and change, rather than developing a truly autonomous and more sustainable local governance.
Discussion of resilience in the context of authoritarian or non-democratic regimes is particularly important, because resilience, as a theory of self-governance, is focused on capacity-building of the existing critical infrastructures. Their identification and differentiation from the structures that support and reproduce non-democratic regimes would be critical for societal and state resilience-building. This discussion however goes beyond the scope of this article, and will be developed elsewhere.
Biermann, M., K. Hillmer-Pegram, C.N. Knapp, and R.E. Hum. 2016. ‘Approaching a Critical Turn? A Content Analysis of the Politics of Resilience in Key Bodies of Resilience Literature’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 4 (2): 59–78.
Bourbeau, P. 2013. ‘Resiliencism: Premises and Promises in Securitisation Research’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 3–17.
Bourbeau, P. 2018. A Genealogy of Resilience in World Politics. International Political Sociology 12 (1): 1–20.
Bourbeau, P., and C. Ryan. 2017. ‘Resilience, Resistance, Infrapolitics and Enmeshment’. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117692031.
Chandler, D. 2014. ‘Beyond Neoliberalism: Resilience, the New Art of Governing Complexity’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 2 (1): 47–63.
Chandler, D. 2015. Resilience and the “Everyday”: Beyond the Paradox of “Liberal Peace”. Review of International Studies 41: 27–48.
Chandler, D., and J. Coaffee (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. London: Routledge.
Corry, O. 2014. From Defense to Resilience: Environmental Security beyond Neo-Liberalism. International Political Sociology 8: 256–274.
Edkins, J. 1999. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. London: Lynne Rienners Publishers.
European Commission. 2012. The EU Approach to Resilience: Learning from Food Security Crises. COM 586 final. Brussels, 3 October.
European Commission. 2013. Action Plan for Resilience in Crisis Prone Countries 2013–2020. SWD 227 final. Brussels, 19 June.
European Commission. 2014a. EU Resilience Compendium: Saving Lives and Livelihoods. Brussels, April. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/policies/resilience/eu_resilience_compendium_en.pdf.
European Commission. 2014b. Resilience Marker: A General Guide. Brussels, November.
European Commission. 2015a. Towards a New European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN 6 final. Brussels, 4 March.
European Commission. 2015b. Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN 50 final. Brussels, 18 November.
European Commission. 2016. Eastern Partnership—Focusing on Key Priorities and Deliverables. SWD 467 final. Brussels 15 December.
European External Action Service (EEAS). 2016 Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels, June. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.
European External Action Service (EEAS). 2017 EAP: Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Armenia (CEPA). https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eng_cepa_factsheet_armenia_digital.pdf.
Fisher Onar, N., and K. Nicolaidis. 2013. The Decentering Agenda: Europe as a Post-Colonial Power. Conflict and Cooperation, Special Issue 48 (2): 283–303.
Fleming, J. and Ledogar, R. 2008. ‘Resilience, an Evolving Concept: A Review of Literature Relevant to Aboriginal Research’, Pimatisiwin, Summer 6(2): 7–23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956753/.
Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–78. In ed. M. Senellart; tr. by G. Burchell).
Henökl, T. (2018) ‘The European Neighbourhood Policy and the CFSP/CSDP: from the European Security Strategy to Global Strategy’, A. Marchetti, T. Demmelhuber, T., and Schumacher, T. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, Ch.46. London: Routledge.
Joseph, J. 2013. ‘Resilience as Embedded Neoliberalism: A Governmentality Approach’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 38–52.
Joseph, J. 2016. Governing Through Failure and Denial: The New Resilience Agenda. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (3): 370–390.
Juncos, A. 2017. Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: A Pragmatic Turn? European Security 26 (1): 1–18.
Kaufmann, M. 2013. ‘Emergent Self-Organisation in Emergencies: Resilience Rationalities in Interconnected Societies’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 53–68.
Kelley, J. 2006. New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New ENP. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 29–55.
Korosteleva, E. 2012. The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbours: Towards a More Ambitious Partnership?. Abingdon: Routledge.
Korosteleva, E. 2017. The Eastern Partnership: Bringing the Political Back In. East European Politics 33 (3): 1–25.
Korosteleva, E. 2018. ‘The Challenges of the Eastern Neighbourhood’, in A. Marchetti, T. Demmelhuber, T., and Schumacher, T. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, Ch.15. London: Routledge.
Korosteleva, E., M. Natorski, and L. Simão (eds.). 2014. EU Policies in the Eastern Neighbourhood: The Practices Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kurki, M. 2011. ’Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion’. International Political Sociology 5: 349–366.
Lavenex, S. 2004. EU External Governance in “Wider Europe”. Journal of Public Policy 11 (4): 680–700.
Lavenex, S. 2016. On the Fringes of the European Peace Project: The Neighbourhood Policy’s functionalist Hubris and Political Myopia. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116685261.
Lundborg, T., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2011. Resilience, Critical Infrastructure, and Molecular Security: The Excess of “Life” in Biopolitics”. International Political Sociology 5: 367–383.
Mavelli, L. 2016. Governing the Resilience of Neoliberalism Through Biopolitics. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116676321.
Raik, K. 2006. The EU as a Regional Power: Extended Governance and Historical Responsibility. In A Responsible Europe? Ethical Foundations of EU External Affairs, ed. H. Mayer and H. Vogt, 76–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reid, J., and D. Chandler. 2016. The Neoliberal Subject. Resilience, Adaptation and Vulnerability. London: Row man and Littlefield International.
Rutazibwa, O. 2014. Studying Agaciro: Moving Beyond Wilsonian Interventionist Knowledge Production on Rwanda. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 8 (4): 291–302.
Sadiki, L. 2016. The Arab Spring: The “People” in International Relations. In International Relations of the Middle East, ed. L. Fawcett, 325–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, J. 2015. Intuitively Neoliberal? Towards a Critical Understanding of Resilience Governance. European Journal of International Relations 21 (2): 402–426.
Walker, J., and M. Cooper. 2011. Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation. Security Dialogue 42 (2): 143–160.
Wagner, W., and R. Anholt. 2016. Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s New Leitmotif: Pragmatic, Problematic or Promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 414–430.
Wolczuk, K. 2009. Implementation Without Coordination: The Impact of the EU Conditionality on Ukraine Under the European Neighbourhood Policy. Europe-Asia Studies 61 (2): 187–211.
Zebrowski, C. 2013. ‘The Nature of Resilience’. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (3): 159–173.
I wish to thank the anonymous referees, and the JIRD editors for their constructive feedback on the earlier versions of this paper.
This project was supported by the EU Horizon 2020 UPTAKE project [Grant No 691818] and GCRF RCUK COMPASS project, 2017-21 (ES/PO10849/1).
About this article
Cite this article
Korosteleva, E.A. Paradigmatic or critical? Resilience as a new turn in EU governance for the neighbourhood. J Int Relat Dev 23, 682–700 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0155-z
- European Union
- Eastern neighbourhood