EU external policy coherence in the trade-foreign policy nexus: foreign policy through trade or strictly business?
This article focuses on the horizontal coherence between EU trade and foreign policy, from the perspective of EU trade instruments. Drawing from different strands of literature, it puts forward the argument that synergetic coherence between the trade and foreign policy spheres of the EU is not likely to be realised due to the constraining impact of institutional-ideational factors within the EU, more specifically the continuing institutional compartmentalisation and cross-pillar divides of the EU system of external policy, with DG Trade being a highly autonomous sub-system. The establishment of synergetic coherence in the trade-foreign policy nexus has been further impeded since the mid-1990s by the emergence of three interrelated factors: legal restraints imposed by the World Trade Organization, growing export-oriented interests of EU businesses and the ideological pro-liberalisation bias of the EU. This argument is empirically illustrated through an analysis of various EU trade initiatives, including the Global Europe agreements, the Economic Partnership Agreements, the Generalised System of Preferences, and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with the countries of the European Neighbourhood Policy.
KeywordsEuropean Union Foreign and security policy Policy coherence Trade policy
We are grateful to the seven anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions during the review process.
- Agence Europe. 2009. Parliament calls for assurance regarding EPA, 25 March, 2009.Google Scholar
- Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2013. Linking Traditional and Non-Traditional Security in Bilateral Free Trade Agreements: The US Approach. In Linking Trade and Security. Evolving Institutions and Strategies in Asia, Europe, and the United States, 175–200, ed. Vinod K. Aggarwal, and Kristi Govella. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Kristi Govella 2013. Preface. In Linking Trade and Security. Evolving Institutions and Strategies in Asia, Europe, and the United States, ed. Vinod K. Aggarwal and Kristi Govella, i–vv. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ahnlid, Anders. 2013. The Trade Do-Gooder? Linkages in EU Free Trade Agreement Negotiations. In Linking Trade and Security. Evolving Institutions and Strategies in Asia, Europe, and the United States, ed. Vinod K. Aggarwal, and Kristi Govella, 201–222, London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
- Bilal, San, Isabelle Ramdoo and Quentin de Roquefeuil (2011) ‘GSP Reform: Principles, Values and Coherence’, ECDPM Briefing Note 24.Google Scholar
- Biscop, Sven. 2005. The European Security Strategy: A Global Agenda for Positive Power. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Bossuyt, Fabienne, Lotte Drieghe, and Jan Orbie. 2013. Living Apart Together: EU Comprehensive Security from a Trade Perspective. European Foreign Affairs Review 18: 63–82.Google Scholar
- Business Europe. 2010. Recommendations for the EU Generalised System of Preferences. Position Paper, 1 June, available online at https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2010-01429-E.pdf [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- CDSN (Civil Society Dialogue Network). 2013. The EU’s Comprehensive Approach to External Action: Gathering Civil Society Input, Meeting Report, Brussels, 30 January.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2002a. Council Decision 2002/148/EC of 18 February, 2002, concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2002b. Council Common position 2002/145/CFSP of 18 February, 2002, concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 of 20 December, 2007, applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2009. Strengthening EU Action in Afghanistan and Pakistan’, Council conclusions, 2971st External Relations Council meeting, Luxembourg, 27 October, 2009.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2012a. Council Decision 2012/96/EU of 17 February, 2012, adapting and extending the period of application of the appropriate measures first established by Decision 2002/148/EC concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2012b. Council Conclusion, 3209th Council meeting, Foreign Affairs, Brussels, 10 December, 2012.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. 2014. EU restrictive measures in view of the situation in Eastern Ukraine and the illegal annexation of Crimea, background note, Brussels, 29 July, 2014, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/144159.pdf [last accessed on 5 January, 2018].
- Cremona, Marise. 2010. The European Union and Regional Trade Agreements’, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Vol. 1, Part 2, 245–268.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2006. Global Europe: Competing in the World: a Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy, COM(2006)567, Brussels, 4 October, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=211&serie=163&langId=en [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- European Commission. 2010. Trade, Growth and World Affairs. COM(2010)61, Brussels, 9 November, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/november/tradoc_146955.pdf [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- European Commission. 2012. Using EU Trade Policy to promote fundamental human rights. Current policies and practices, non-paper, Brussels, February, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/february/tradoc_149064.pdf [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- European Commission. 2014. Joint Ministerial Statement on the Implementation of the EU-Ukraine AA/DCFTA, Brussels, 12 September, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-276_en.htm [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- European Commission. 2015a. Factsheet on the trilateral talks on DCFTA implementation, Brussels, 21 December, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/december/tradoc_154126.pdf [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- European Commission. 2015b. ‘Trade for all—Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy’, COM(2015) 497 final, Brussels, 14 October, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/october/tradoc_153846.pdf [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].
- European Parliament. 2013. European Parliament resolution of 25 March, 2009, on the Interim agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between Eastern and Southern Africa States on the one part and the European Community and its Member States on the other part, Strasbourg, P6_TA(2009)0180.Google Scholar
- European Security Strategy. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy, European Council, 12 December.Google Scholar
- European Security Strategy. 2008. Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy: Providing Security in a Changing World, Brussels, 11 December.Google Scholar
- European Services Forum. 2007. Negotiations of Services Commitments in the Economic Partnership Agreements, letter to Peter Mandelson, available at http://www.esf.be/new/wpcontent/uploads/2009/01/esf2007-27-peter-mandelson-services-in-epas1.pdf [last accessed on 3 January, 2018].
- European Services Forum. 2010. Annex 3 of the minutes of the 45th meeting of the ESF Policy Committee, European Commission briefing on DDA and Bilaterals, Brussels, 31 March, 2010.Google Scholar
- European Union Global Strategy. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy, Brussels, June 2016.Google Scholar
- Gebhard, Carmen. 2011. Coherence. In International Relations and the European Union, 2nd ed, ed. Christopher Hill, and Michael Smith, 101–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gstöhl, Sieglinde. 2014. No Strings Attached? The EU’s Emergency Trade Preferences for Pakistan. In EU Management of Global Emergencies: Legal Framework for Combating Threats and Crisis, Pagination, ed. Inge Govaere, and Sara Poli. Brill/Nijhoff: Leiden.Google Scholar
- Guzzini, Stefano (ed.). 2013. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hay, Colin. 2007. What Doesn’t Kill You Can Only Make You Stronger: The Doha Development Round, the Services Directive and the EU’s Conception of Competitiveness. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(annual review): 25–43.Google Scholar
- Helwig, Niklas, Paul Ivan, and Hrant Kostanyan. 2013. The New EU Foreign Policy Architecture: Reviewing the First Two Years of the EEAS. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
- Keil, Soeren, and Zeynep Arkan (eds.). 2014. The EU and Member State Building: European Foreign Policy in the Western Balkans. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Khorana, Sangeeta, May Yeung, William A. Kerr, and Nick Perdikis. 2012. The Battle over the EU’s Proposed Humanitarian Trade Preferences for Pakistan: A Case Study in Multifaceted Protectionism. Journal of World Trade 46 (1): 33–59.Google Scholar
- Kleimann, David. 2011. Taking Stock: EU Common Commercial Policy in the Lisbon Era. CEPS Working Document, No. 345, April.Google Scholar
- Manoli, Panagiota. 2013. Political Economy Aspects of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements. Eastern Journal of European Studies 4 (2): 51–72.Google Scholar
- Marangoni, Anne-Claire and Sophie Vanhoonacker 2015. The consistency of EU external action post-Lisbon: Renewing appropriate measures against Zimbabwe in 2012. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 19, Article 3, 1–22, available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2015-003a.htm [last accessed on 3 January, 2018].
- Messerlin, Patrick. 2013. The Domestic Political Economy of Preferential Trade Agreements. In EU Preferential Trade Agreements: Commerce, Foreign Policy and Development Aspects, ed. David Kleimann, 25–42. Florence: EUI.Google Scholar
- Messerlin, Patrick, Michael Emerson, Gia Jandieri, and Alexandre Le Vernoy. 2011. An Appraisal of the EU’s Trade Policy Towards Its Eastern Neighbours: The Case of Georgia. Brussels: CEPS Paperbacks.Google Scholar
- Meunier, Sophie, and Kalypso Nicolaïdis. 2011. The European Union as a Trade Power. In International Relations and the European Union, 2nd ed, ed. Christopher Hill, and Michael Smith, 275–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nuttall, Simon. 2005. Coherence and Consistency. In International Relations and the European Union, ed. Christopher Hill, and Michael Smith, 91–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Olsen, Gorm R. 2009. The Missing Link: EPAs, Security and Development Interventions in Africa. In Beyond Market Access for Economic Development: EU–Africa Relations in Transition, ed. Gerrit Faber, and Jan Orbie, 342–358. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pempel, T.J. 2013. Introduction: The Economy-Security Nexus in Northeast Asia. In The Economy-Security Nexus in Northeast Asia, ed. T.J. Pempel, 1–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Peterson, John 2007. EU Trade Policy as Foreign Policy: Does Strategy plus Activity = Strategic Action? Paper presented at the Biennial EUSA Conference, Montreal, 17–19 May.Google Scholar
- Pilegaard, Jess. 2009. … and Never the Twain Shall Meet? An Institutionalist Perspective of EU Trade and Development Policies in the Context of the EPA Negotiations. In Beyond Market Access for Economic Development: EU–Africa Relations in Transition, ed. Gerrit Faber, and Jan Orbie, 263–276. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Portela, Clara, and Kolja Raube. 2008. Six Authors in Search of a Notion: (In)Coherence in EU Foreign Policy and Its Causes. In Revisiting Coherence in the EU Foreign Policy, Pagination, ed. Clara Portela, and Kolja Raube. Hamburg: Hamburg Review of Social Science.Google Scholar
- Rigod, Boris 2011. ‘The “New Generation” of EU Free Trade Agreements and the Duty of Consistency. Ever-Closer in Brussels—Ever-Closer in the World? EU External Action after the Lisbon Treaty, ed. Joris Larik, and Madalina Moraru, 61–78, Florence: EUI Working Papers, Law 2011/10.Google Scholar
- Schade, Daniel. 2016. Coercion through Linkage: Exploring the Dynamics of the EU-Ecuador Free Trade Agreement. Paper presented at the EUIA Conference, Brussels, 13 May.Google Scholar
- Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2013. The Power of Economic Ideas: A Constructivist Political Economy of EU Trade Policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (4): 597–617.Google Scholar
- Smith, Michael E. 2004. The Quest for Coherence. In The Institutionalisation of Europe, ed. Alec S. Sweet, Wayne Sandholdz, and Neil Fligstein, 171–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, Michael E. 2005. Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy. The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Szymanski, Marcela and Michael E. Smith. 2005. Coherence and conditionality in European foreign policy: negotiating the EU-Mexico global agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies 43(1): pagination.Google Scholar
- Trood, Russell. 1990. Australian Diplomatic Practice: Methods and Theory. In The Diplomatic Ideas and Practices of Asian States, 88–113, ed. Ashok Kapur. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
- Trood, Russell. 2001. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. In Australian Foreign Policy: Into the New Millennium, ed. Fedor Mediansky, 33–52. South Yarra: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Van Den Putte, Lore, Ferdi De Ville, and Jan Orbie. 2015. The European Parliament as an International Actor in Trade: From Power to Impact. In The European Parliament and Its International Relations, ed. Stelios Stavridis, and Daniela Irrera, 52–69. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van Elsuwege, Peter. 2010. EU External Action after the Collapse of the Pillar Structure. In Search of a New Balance between Delimitation and Consistency. Common Market Law Review 47 (4): 987–1019.Google Scholar
- Van Ham, Peter. 2013. ‘The Geopolitics of TTIP’, Clingendael Policy Brief No. 23, October 2013.Google Scholar
- Vanhoonacker, Sophie. 2011. The Institutional Framework. In International Relations and the European Union, 2nd ed, ed. Christopher Hill, and Michael Smith, 75–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vogt, J. 2015. The EU and the (Non) Application of Labour Conditionality in the GSP. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 31 (3): 285–304.Google Scholar
- Waer, Paul. 1996. Social Clauses in International Trade. The Debate in the European Union. Journal of World Trade 30 (4): 25–42.Google Scholar
- WTO 2012. Council for Trade in Goods, Members approve EU waiver request for trade aid to Pakistan, 1 February, available at https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news12_e/good_02feb12_e.htm. [last accessed on 8 January, 2018].