Advertisement

Securitisation through the schoolbook? On facilitating conditions for and audience dispositions towards the securitisation of climate change

  • Tobias Ide
  • Adrien Detges
  • Timo Leimeister
Original Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

This article contributes to the literature on securitisation in a twofold way. Firstly, it argues that school textbooks reveal the consolidated discursive realms of a given society and convey them to the next generation. Focusing on school textbooks can thus enrich the analysis of facilitating conditions for securitisation processes. The second and main contribution of this article is that it addresses the lack of empirical studies on the audience in securitisation research. After an analysis of climate change discourses in Germany, we test whether or not students exposed to vastly different positions in the same consolidated discursive realm are more prone to accept the securitisation of climate change. In order to do so, we use a quasi-experimental research design and a closed questionnaire. Results show that young people who read school textbooks using an alarmist logic are indeed more likely to conceive climate change as an urgent threat necessitating extraordinary measures, and are thus more likely to accept the securitisation of climate change.

Keywords

Audience Climate change Discursive realm Education Facilitating conditions Securitisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all teachers and students who supported this study and participated in the survey. We also thank Ingrid Boas and Delf Rothe for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper as well as Johanna Ahlrichs and Patrick Mielke for advice on designing research in classroom contexts.

References

  1. Abrahamsen, Rita. 2005. Blair’s Africa: The politics of securitisation and fear. Alternatives 30 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin-Khan, Tariq. 2012. New orientalism, securitisation and the Western Media’s incendiary racism. Third World Quarterly 33 (9): 1595–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aradau, Claudia. 2004. Security and the democratic scene. Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (4): 388–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aradau, Claudia, and Rens van Munster. 2007. Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un-)knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balzacq, Thierry. 2005. The three faces of securitisation: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balzacq, Thierry. 2011. A theory of securitisation: Origins, core assumptions, and variants. In Securitisation theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq, 1–30. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Balzacq, Thierry, Stefano Guzzini, Michael C. Williams, Ole Wæver, and Heikki Patomäki. 2015. What theory—if any—is securitisation? International Relations 29 (1): 96–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beier, J.Marshall. 2015. Children, childhoods, and security studies: An introduction. Critical Studies on Security 3 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benwell, Matthew C. 2014. From the banal to the blatant: Expressions of nationalism in secondary schools in Argentina and the Falkland Islands. Geoforum 52 (1): 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigo, Didier. 2002. Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives 27 (2): 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilgin, Pilgin. 2010. The ‘western-centrism’ of security studies: “Blind spot” or constitutive practice? Security Dialogue 41 (6): 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boas, Ingrid. 2014. Where is the South in security discourse on climate change? An analysis of India. Critical Studies on Security 2 (2): 148–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bosco, Fernando J. 2010. Play, work or activism? Broadening the connections between political and children’s geographies. Children’s Geographies 8 (4): 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brader, Ted, Nicholas Valentino, and Elizabeth Suhay. 2008. What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and the immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, Wendy. 2011. The end of educated democracy. Representations 116 (1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brzoska, Michael. 2009. The securitisation of climate change and the power of conceptions of security. Security & Peace 27 (3): 137–145.Google Scholar
  17. Brzoska, Michael. 2012. Climate change as a driver of security policy. In Climate change, human security and violent conflict: Challenges for societal stability, ed. Jürgen Scheffran, Michael Brzoska, Hans Günter Brauch, Peter Michael Link, and Janpeter Schilling, 165–184. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2009. Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: Reconsidering scale in securitisation theory. Review of International Studies 35 (2): 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  21. Campbell, David. 2007. Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography 26 (4): 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christou, Miranda, and Spyros Spyrou. 2016. Children’s emotional geographies and the geopolitics of division in Cyprus. In Children, young people and critical geopolitics, ed. Matthew C. Benwell, and Peter Hopkins, 75–90. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, Alan. 2005. Securitisation, Frankenstein’s monster and Malaysian education. Pacific Review 18 (4): 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Corry, Olaf. 2012. Securitisation and ‘riskification’: Second-order security and the politics of climate change. Millennium 40 (2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Côté, Adam. 2016. Agents without agency: Assessing the role of the audience in securitisation. Security Dialogue 47 (6): 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Detraz, Nicole, and Michele M. Betsill. 2009. Climate change and environmental security: For whom the discourse shifts. International Studies Perspectives 10 (3): 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Diez, Thomas, Franziskus von Lucke, and Zehra Wellmann. 2016. The securitisation of climate change: Actors, processes and consequences. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ditrych, Ondrej. 2013. From discourse to dispositive: States and terrorism between Marseille and 9/11. Security Dialogue 44 (3): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dittmer, Jason, and Nicholas Gray. 2010. Popular geopolitics 2.0: Towards new methodologies of the everyday. Geography Compass 4 (11): 1664–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 2007. States of exception on the Mexico-U.S. border: Security, “decisions”, and civilian border patrols. International Political Sociology 1 (2): 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dunn, Elizabeth W., Moriah Moore, and Brian A. Nosek. 2005. The war of the words: How linguistic differences in reporting shape perceptions of terrorism. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 5 (1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. EDU.DATA. 2017. Textbook systems worldwide. http://edu-data.edumeres.net. Accessed 2 February 2017.
  33. Emmers, Ralf. 2003. ASEAN and the securitisation of transnational crime in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review 16 (3): 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Floyd, Rita. 2008. The environmental security debate and its significance for climate change. International Spectator 43 (3): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fröhlich, Christiane. 2012. Security and discourse: The Israeli-Palestinian water conflict. Conflict, Security & Development 12 (2): 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukuoka, Kazuya. 2011. School history textbooks and historical memory in Japan: A study of reception. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 23 (3–4): 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2010. The politics of threat: How terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Politics 72 (2): 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan, and Nancy Signorielli. 1986. Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In Perspectives on media effects, ed. Jennings Bryant, and Dolf Zillman, 17–40. Hilldale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Gillespie, Marie, and Ben O’Loughlin. 2009. News, media threats and insecurities. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (4): 667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Ragnhild Nordås. 2014. Conflicting messages? The IPCC on conflict and human security. Political Geography 43 (1): 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goldsmith, Benjamin E., and Yusaku Horiuchi. 2012. In search of soft power: Does foreign public opinion matter for US foreign policy? World Politics 64 (3): 555–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Greenwood, Maja Touzari, and Ole Wæver. 2013. Copenhagen-Cairo on a roundtrip: A security theory meets the revolution. Security Dialogue 44 (5–6): 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griswold, Wendy, Elizabeth Lenaghan, and Michelle Naffziger. 2011. Readers as audiences. In The handbook of media audiences, ed. Virginia Nightingale, 41–61. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Grundman, Reiner, and Ramesh Krishnamurthy. 2008. The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 4 (2): 113–133.Google Scholar
  45. Hammerstad, Anne. 2012. On securitisation from below: The relationship between immigration and foreign policy in South Africa’s approach to the Zimbabwe crisis. Conflict, Security and Development 12 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hansen, Lene. 2011. The politics of securitisation and the Muhammad cartoon crisis: A post-structuralist perspective. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hartmann, Betsy. 2010. Rethinking climate refugees and climate conflict: Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse. Journal of International Development 22 (2): 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heck, Axel, and Gabi Schlag. 2012. Securitising images: The female body and the war in Afghanistan. European Journal of International Relations 19 (4): 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ide, Tobias. 2016. Critical geopolitics and school textbooks: The case of environment–conflict links in Germany. Political Geography 55 (1): 61–70.Google Scholar
  50. Ide, Tobias. 2017a. Space, discourse and environmental peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly 38 (3): 544–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ide, Tobias. 2017b. Terrorism in the textbook: a comparative analysis of terrorism discourses in Germany, India, Kenya and the United States based on school textbooks. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 1–23Google Scholar
  52. Ingrao, Charles. 2009. Weapons of mass instruction: Schoolbooks and democratisation in multiethnic Central Europe. Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society 1 (1): 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jackson, Richard, and Gereth Hall. 2016. Talking about terrorism: A study of vernacular discourse. Politics 36 (3): 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kallio, Kirsi Pauliina. 2014. Rethinking spatial socialization as a dynamic and relational process of political becoming. Global Studies of Childhood 4 (3): 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Karafoulidis, Tasos. 2012. Audience: a weak link in the securitisation of the environment. In Climate change, human security and violent conflict: Challenges for societal stability, ed. Jürgen Scheffran, Michael Brzoska, Hans Günter Brauch, Peter Michael Link, and Janpeter Schilling, 259–272. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klerides, Eleftherios. 2010. Imagining the textbook: Textbooks as discourse and genre. Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society 2 (1): 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lässig, Simone. 2009. Textbooks and beyond: Educational media in context(s). Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society 1 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leiserowitz, Anthony. 2004. Before and after the day after tomorrow: A U.S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment 46 (9): 22–37.Google Scholar
  59. Léonard, Sarah, and Christian Kaunert. 2011. Reconceptualising the audience in securitization theory. In Securitisation theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq, 57–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Mac Ginty, Roger, and Pamina Firchow. 2016. Top-down and bottom-up narratives of peace and conflict. Politics 36 (3): 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2012. Global subjects: An ethnographic study of educational media production and forms of subjectivation. Pragmatics 22 (3): 417–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mavelli, Luca. 2013. Between normalisation and exception: The securitisation of Islam and the construction of the secular subject. Millennium 41 (2): 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McCombs, Maxwell, and Salma I. Ghanem. 2001. The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, ed. Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant, 67–81. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. McDonald, Matt. 2013. Discourses of climate security. Political Geography 33 (1): 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McSweeney, Bill. 1997. Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School. Review of International Studies 22 (1): 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Methmann, Chris, and Angela Oels. 2016. Securing the environment: From defense to resilience. In Transformations of security studies: Dialogues, diversity and discipline, ed. Gabi Schlag, Julian Junk, and Christopher Daase, 142–155. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  67. Methmann, Chris, and Delf Rothe. 2012. Politics for the day after tomorrow: The logic of apocalypse in global climate politics. Security Dialogue 43 (4): 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Methmann, Chris, and Delf Rothe. 2014. Tracing the spectre that haunts Europe: The visual construction of climate-induced migration in the MENA region. Critical Studies on Security 2 (2): 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moshirzadeh, Homeria. 2007. Discursive foundations of Iran’s nuclear policy. Security Dialogue 38 (4): 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nguyen, Nicole. 2014. Education as warfare? Mapping securitised education interventions as war on terror strategy. Geopolitics 19 (1): 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Niedersächsische Landeswahlleiterin. 2013. Amtliches Endergebnis der Wahl des Niedersächsischen Landtages der 17. Wahlperiode am 20. Januar 2013 [Official result of the election for the parliament of Lower Saxony on January 20 2013]. Hannover: Niedersachsen.Google Scholar
  72. O’Neill, Saffron, and Sophie Nicholson-Cole. 2009. “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 30 (3): 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Oels, Angela. 2012. ‘From “securitisation” of climate change to “climatisation” of the security field: Comparing three theoretical perspectives. In Climate change, human security and violent conflict: Challenges for societal stability, ed. Jürgen Scheffran, Michael Brzoska, Hans Günter Brauch, P.Michael Link, and Janpeter Schilling, 185–206. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pain, Dan A., Ruth Panelli, Sara Kindon, and Jo Little. 2010. Moments in everyday/distant geopolitics: Young people’s fears and hopes. Geoforum 41 (6): 972–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Porat, Dan A. 2004. It’s not written here, but this is what happened: Student’s cultural comprehension of textbook narratives on the Israeli–Arab conflict. American Educational Research Journal 41 (4): 963–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Prince, Vincent, David Tewksbury, and Elizabeth Powers. 1997. Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research 24 (5): 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reusswig, Fritz. 2010. The new climate change discourse: A challenge for environmental security. In Environmental sociology: European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges, ed. Matthias Gross, and Harald Heinrichs, 39–57. Dodrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ridout, Travis N., Ashley C. Grosse, and Andrew M. Appleton. 2008. News media use and Americans’ perceptions of global threat. British Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roe, Paul. 2008. Actor, audience(s) and emergency measures: Securitisation and the UK’s decision to invade Iraq. Security Dialogue 39 (6): 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roe, Paul. 2012. Is securitisation a ‘negative’ concept? Revisiting the normative debate over normal versus extraordinary politics. Security Dialogue 43 (3): 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rothe, Delf. 2015. Securitising global warming: A climate of complexity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Salter, Marc B. 2008. Securitisation and desecuritisation: A dramaturgical analysis of the Canadian Transport Security Authority. Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (4): 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sampei, Yuki, and Midori Aoyagi-Usui. 2009. Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change 19 (2): 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schäfer, Mike S., Ana Ivanova, and Andreas Schmidt. 2013. What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette 76 (2): 152–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Skelton, Tracey. 2013. Young people, children, politics and space: A decade of youthful political geography scholarship 2003–13. Space and Polity 17 (1): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Solomon, Ty, and Brent J. Steele. 2017. Micro-moves in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 23 (2): 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stadt Braunschweig. 2015. Statistik-Atlas Braunschweig [Statistical handbook Braunschweig]. http://www3.braunschweig.de/statistik/StatistikAtlas2015/atlas.html. Accessed 6 February 2017.
  88. Stadt Salzgitter. 2014. Arbeitsmarkt, Bevölkerung und Umwelt: Monatsbericht 12/2014 [Employment, population and environment: monthly report 12/2014]. Salzgitter: Referat für Wirtschaft und Statistik.Google Scholar
  89. Lucke, Von, Zehra Wellmann Franziskus, and Thomas Diez. 2014. What’s at stake in securitising climate change? Towards a differentiated approach. Geopolitics 19 (4): 857–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Staeheli, Lynn A., and Daniel Hammett. 2013. “For the future of the nation”: Citizenship, nation, and education in South Africa. Political Geography 32 (1): 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stanley, Liam, and Richard Jackson. 2016. Introduction: Everyday narratives on world politics. Politics 36 (3): 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stevens, Daniel, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2014. Citizens and security threats: Issues, perceptions and consequences beyond the national frame. British Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stritzel, Holger. 2007. Towards a theory of securitisation: Copenhagen and beyond. European Journal of International Relations 13 (3): 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stritzel, Holger. 2011. Security, the translation. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Trombetta, M.J. 2008. Environmental security and climate change: Analysing the discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (4): 585–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vaughan-Williams, Nick, and Daniel Stevens. 2015. Vernacular theories of everyday (in)security: The disruptive potential of non-elite knowledge. Security Dialogue 47 (1): 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Voigtländer, Nico, and Hans-Joachim Voth. 2016. Nazi indoctrination and anti-Semitic beliefs in Germany. PNAS 112 (26): 7931–7936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vom Hau, Matthias. 2009. Unpacking the school: Textbooks, teachers, and the construction of nationhood in Mexico, Argentina, and Peru. Latin American Research Review 44 (3): 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vultee, Fred. 2011. Securitisation as a media frame: What happens when the media “speak security”. In Securitisation theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq, 77–93. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  100. Vultee, Fred, Marta Lukacovic, and Ryan Stouffer. 2015. Eyes 1, brain 0: securitisation in text, image, and news topic. International Communication Research Journal 50 (2): 111–138.Google Scholar
  101. Watson, Alison M.S. 2006. Children and international relations: A new site of knowledge? Review of International Studies 32 (2): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Watson, Scott D. 2012. “Framing” the Copenhagen School: Integrating the literature on threat construction. Millennium 40 (2): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

School textbooks cited

  1. Grabowksi, Jürgen. 2012. Politik entdecken: Politik und Wirtschaft, Band 2 [Exploring politics: politics and the economy, volume 2], Braunschweig: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
  2. Mattes, Wolfgang, Karin Herzig, and Thorsten Schaller. 2013. Politik erleben: Sozialkunde—Politische Bildung [Experiencing politics: Social studies—political education], Braunschweig: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georg Eckert InstituteBrunswickGermany
  2. 2.Department of Political and Social Sciences, FU BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations