Skip to main content
Log in

Home and foreign host country IFRS adoption and cross-delisting

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines whether and how the mandatory adoption of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) affects a firm’s cross-delisting decision. Using a comprehensive sample of international cross-delistings, we show that mandatory IFRS adoption in the cross-listing host countries of multinational enterprises (MNEs) increases the delisting propensity of non-IFRS-reporting firms. In contrast, mandatory IFRS adoption in both home and host countries of cross-listing firms decreases the delisting propensity of MNEs in the post-IFRS period. The results of cross-sectional tests further suggest that the increased cross-delisting propensity for domestic GAAP-reporting firms post-IFRS adoption in foreign host countries is more pronounced for firms with a greater difference between domestic GAAP and IFRS. Overall, our results show the differential effects of IFRS adoption in home/host countries of MNEs on their cross-delisting decisions.

Résumé

Cette étude examine si et comment l’adoption obligatoire des Normes internationales d’informations financières (international financial reporting standards, IFRS) influence la décision de radiations croisées d’une firme. En utilisant un échantillon complet de radiations croisées internationales, nous montrons que l’adoption obligatoire des IFRS dans les pays hôtes des entreprises multinationales (EMN) cotées dans plusieurs bourses augmente la propension à la radiation des entreprises ne déclarant pas selon les IFRS. En revanche, l’adoption obligatoire des IFRS dans les pays d’origine et d’accueil des firmes cotées dans plusieurs bourses diminue la propension des EMN à la radiation dans la période post-IFRS. Les résultats des tests transversaux suggèrent en outre que la propension croissante à la radiation croisée des firmes nationales qui déclarent selon les PCGR après l’adoption des IFRS dans les pays hôtes étrangers est plus prononcée pour les firmes dont la différence entre les PCGR nationaux et les IFRS est plus importante. Globalement, nos résultats montrent les effets différentiels de l’adoption des IFRS par les EMN dans les pays d’origine/hôtes sur leurs décisions de radiation.

Resumen

Este estudio examina si y cómo la adopción obligatoria de las Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (NIIF) afecta la decisión de retiro del mercado bursátil simultaneo de una empresa. Usando una muestra exhaustiva de retiros de mercados bursátiles internacionales, mostramos que la adopción obligatoria de las NIIF en los países anfitriones de las empresas multinacionales (EMN) aumenta la propensión al retiro del mercado bursátil de las empresas que no reportan las NIIF. En contraste, la adopción obligatoria de NIIF tanto en los países de origen como en los países anfitriones de las empresas disminuye la propensión al retiro del mercado bursátil de las empresas multinacionales en el periodo posterior a las NIIF. Los resultados de las pruebas transversales además sugieren que el aumento de la propensión al retiro del mercado bursátil simultáneamente en el país de origen y país anfitrión de las empresas que reportan bajo PCGA después de la adopción de las NIIF en países anfitriones extranjeros es más pronunciada para empresas con más diferencias entre las PCGA nacionales y las NIIF. En términos generales, nuestros resultados muestran cómo los factores diferenciales de la adopción de las NIIF en países de origen/anfitriones de las empresas multinacionales en sus decisiones sobre el retiro del mercado bursátil simultáneamente en el país de origen.

Resumo

Este estudo examina se e como a adoção obrigatória de international financial reporting standards (IFRS) afeta a decisão da empresa de deixar de ser duplamente listada. Utilizando uma amostra abrangente de saída de duplas listagens internacionais, mostramos que a adoção obrigatória de IFRS nos países anfitriões de duplas listagens de empresas multinacionais (MNEs) aumenta a propensão de abandono da dupla listagem de empresas que não utilizam IFRS. Por outro lado, a adoção obrigatória de IFRS tanto no país de origem quanto no de destino de empresas duplamente listadas diminui a propensão de saída da dupla listagem de MNEs no período posterior ao IFRS. Os resultados de testes transversais sugerem ainda que o aumento da propensão de saída de dupla listagem de empresas domésticas optantes por relatórios padrão GAAP após a adoção de IFRS em países anfitriões estrangeiros é mais pronunciado para empresas com uma diferença maior entre GAAP doméstico e IFRS. No geral, nossos resultados mostram os efeitos diferenciais da adoção de IFRS em países de origem/destino de MNEs em suas decisões de abandono de dupla listagem.

摘要

这项研究调查是否强制采用国际财务报告标准(IFRS)以及该标准如何影响公司的交叉摘牌决定。通过使用国际交叉摘牌的综合样本, 我们表明, 跨国企业(MNE)的交叉挂牌东道国强制采用IFRS会增加非IFRS报告公司的摘牌倾向。相比之下, 交叉上市公司在本国和东道国强制采用IFRS会降低跨国企业在后IFRS时期的退市倾向。横截面测试的结果进一步表明,对于在国内GAAP和IFRS之间有较大差异的公司, 国内GAAP报告公司在外国东道国采用IFRS后的交叉摘牌倾向增加。总体而言, 我们的结果表明, 在跨国企业的母国/东道国采用IFRS对其交叉摘牌决策的影响不同。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammer, J.,Holland, S. B., Smith, D. C., & Warnock, F. E. 2012. U.S. international equity investment. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5): 1109–1139.

  • An, Z., Chen, Z., Li, D., & Xing, L. 2018. Individualism and stock price crash risk. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9): 1208–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashbaugh, H., & Pincus, M. 2001. Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, & the predictability of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3): 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA). 2011. Towards greater convergence: Assessing CFO and investor perspectives on global reporting standards. London, U.K.: ACCA. https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/financial-reporting/cfo-investor-perspectives.pdf.

  • Bae, K., Tan, H. & Welker, M. 2008. International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. The Accounting Review, 83(3): 593–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakarich, K. M., & Dahya, J. 2016. Should I stay or should I go? IFRS adoption and deregistration. Working paper, Baruch College.

  • Brüggemann, U., Hitz, J., & Sellhorn, T. 2013. Intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption: A review of extant evidence and suggestions for future research. European Accounting Review, 22(1): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplinsky, S., & Ramchand, L. 2012. What drives delistings of foreign firms from U.S. exchanges? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(5): 1126–1148.

  • Chen, L., Ng, J., & Tsang, A. 2015. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on international cross-listings. The Accounting Review, 90(4): 1395–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquette, E. 2019. Import-based market experience and firms’ exit from export markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(3): 423–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. 2013. Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics 56(2–3): 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. R., Li, D., & Shepherd, D. A. 2018. Country familiarity in the initial stage of foreign market selection. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(4): 442–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coval, J. D. & Moskowitz, T. J. 1999. Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54(6): 2045–2073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covrig, V. M., DeFond, M. L. & Hung, M. 2007. Home bias, foreign mutual fund holdings, & the voluntary adoption of international accounting standards. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(1): 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. 2013. Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences around IAS/IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3): 495–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, M., & Georgieva, D. 2011. Foreign cultures, Sarbanes-Oxley Act and cross-delisting. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 21: 208–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M., Gao, X., Li, O. Z., & Xia, L. 2019. IFRS adoption in China and foreign institutional investments. China Journal of Accounting Research, 12(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M., Hu, X., Hung, M., & Li, S. 2011. The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3): 240–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86(1): 59–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, R., & Goedhart, M. 2008. Why cross-listing shares doesn’t create value. The Mckinsey Quarterly on Perspectives on Corporate Finance and Strategy, 29: 18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. 2010. Why do foreign firms leave U.S. equity markets? Journal of Finance 65(4): 1507 –1553.

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. 2017. The U.S. listing gap. Journal of Financial Economics 123(3): 464–487.

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. 2004. Why are foreign firms listed in the U.S. worth more? Journal of Financial Economics 71(2): 205–238.

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. 2009. Has New York become less competitive in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(3): 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errunza, V. R., & Senbet, L. W. 1981. The effects of international operations on the market value of the firm: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Finance, 36(2): 401–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errunza, V. R., & Senbet, L. W. 1984. International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence. Journal of Finance, 39(3): 727–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, N., & Ferreira, M. A. 2008. Does international cross-listing improve the information environment? Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2): 216–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, N., Lel, U., & Miller, D. 2010. Escape from New York: The market impact of loosening disclosure requirements. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(2): 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florou, A., & Pope, P. F. 2012. Mandatory IFRS adoption and institutional investment decisions. The Accounting Review, 87(6): 1993–2025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, S. R., & Karolyi, G. A.1993. International listings of stocks: The case of Canada and the U.S. Journal of International Business Studies 24(4): 763 − 784.

  • Gagnon, L., & G. A. Karolyi. 2010. Do international cross-listings still matter? Working paper. Cornell University. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1638197.

  • Gande, A., Schenzler, C., & Senbet, L. W. 2009. Valuation effect of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1515–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., Ma, X., & Ding, Z. 2018. Home country supportiveness/unfavorableness and outward foreign direct investment from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3): 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Z., Ng, J., & Tsang, A. 2019. Mandatory IFRS adoption and management forecasts: The impact of enforcement changes. China Journal of Accounting Research, 12(1): 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hail, L., & Leuz, C. 2011. Capital market effects of mandatory IFRS reporting in the EU: Empirical evidence. Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1511671.

  • Hong, H. A., Hung, M., & Lobo, G. 2014. The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on IPOs in global capital markets. The Accounting Review, 89(4): 1365–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J., Serafeim, G., & Serafeim, I. 2013. Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment? Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1): 388–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Mensah, A. K., & Tsang, A. 2019. Foreign institutional ownership and the choice between public and private debt. Journal of International Accounting Research, 18(2)L 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddart, S., Hughes, J. S., & Brunnermeier, M. 1999. Disclosure requirements and stock exchange listing choice in an international context. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–3): 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M., Li, X., & Wang, S. 2015. Post-earnings-announcement drift in global markets: Evidence from an information shock. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(4): 1242–1283.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). 1998. International Disclosure Standards for Cross-Border Offerings and Initial Listings by Foreign Issuers. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD242.pdf

  • Karolyi, G. A. 1998. Why do companies list shares abroad? A survey of the evidence and its managerial implications. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 7(1): 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karolyi, G. A. 2006. The world of cross-listings and cross-listings of the world: Challenging conventional wisdom. Review of Finance, 10(1): 99–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. 2012. The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on audit fees: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6): 2061–2094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koning, M., Mertens, G., & Roosenboom, P. 2018. Drivers of institutional change around the world: The case of IFRS. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3): 249–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M. H., Lins, K. V., & Miller, D. P. 2003a. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2): 317–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., Raedy, J. S., & Yetman, M. 2003b. How representative are cross-listed firms? An analysis of firm performance and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 41: 363–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. 2015. Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(2–3): 110–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lel, U. 2019. The role of foreign institutional investors in restraining earnings management activities across countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(6): 895–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Triantis, A., & Wang, T. Y. 2008. Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3): 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. 2010. Does mandatory adoption of international financial reporting standards in the European Union reduce the cost of equity capital? The Accounting Review, 85(2): 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Stowe, J. D., & Hung, K. 2012. Why U.S. firms delist from the Tokyo stock exchange: An empirical analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 24: 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Zhang, H., & Bu, J. 2019. Developed country MNEs investing in developing economics: Progress and prospect. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4): 633–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marosi, A., & Massoud, N. 2008. “You can enter but you cannot leave…”: U.S. securities markets and foreign firms. Journal of Finance 63(5): 2477–2506.

  • Marosi, A., & Massoud, N. 2007. Why do firms go dark? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(2): 421–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M., Roell, A. A., & Zechner, J. 2002. The geography of equity listing: Why do companies list abroad? Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2651–2694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotroski, J. D., & Srinivasan, S. 2008. Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the flow of international listings. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(2): 383–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna, K., & Sletten, E. 2014. Network effects in countries’ adoption of IFRS. The Accounting Review, 89(4): 1517–1543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribstein, L. E. 2003. Bubble laws. Houston Law Review, 40: 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, G. C., & Peterson, J. D. 1990. An empirical analysis of common stock delistings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2): 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissian, S., & Schill, M. J. 2004. The overseas listing decision: New evidence of proximity preference. Review of Financial Studies, 17(3): 769–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissian, S., & Schill, M. J. 2016. Cross-listing waves. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(01): 259–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saudagaran, S. 1988. An empirical study of selected factors influencing the decision to list on foreign stock exchanges. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 101–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saudagaran, S., & Biddle, G. 1992. Financial disclosure levels and foreign stock exchange listing decisions. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 4(2): 106–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderstrom, N. S., & Sun, K. J. 2007. IFRS adoption and accounting quality: A review. European Accounting Review, 16(4): 675–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surdu, I., Mellahi, K., & Glaister, K. W. 2019. Once bitten, not necessarily shy? Determinants of foreign market re-entry commitment strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(3): 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H., Wang, S., & Welker, M. 2011. Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5): 1307–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, A., Xie, F., & Xin, X. 2019. Foreign institutional investors and corporate voluntary disclosure around the world. The Accounting Review, 94(5): 319–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., & Wahid, A. S. 2014. Accounting standards and international portfolio holdings. The Accounting Review, 89(5): 1895–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank three anonymous referees, Lemma Senbet (editor), and the seminar participants at York University and the 2018 American Accounting Association annual meeting for their helpful suggestions. Xiangting Kong acknowledges the financial support of The National Natural Science Foundation of China (71902201), National Social Science Fund of China (19FGLB048), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation Grant (2018A0303130328), and Guangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science Grant (GD18CYJ09).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangting Kong or Albert Tsang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Accepted by Lemma Senbet, Area Editor, 25 November 2019. This article has been with the authors for seven revisions.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 11.

Table 11 Variable definition

Appendix 2

See Table 12.

Table 12 Mandatory IFRS adoption date

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanagaretnam, K., Kong, X. & Tsang, A. Home and foreign host country IFRS adoption and cross-delisting. J Int Bus Stud 51, 1008–1033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00300-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00300-1

Keywords

Navigation