Advertisement

Managerial metric use in marketing decisions across 16 countries: A cultural perspective

  • Ofer MintzEmail author
  • Imran S Currim
  • Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp
  • Martijn de Jong
Article

Abstract

Research on metrics is consistently designated a priority by academics and practitioners. However, less is known about how culture and cross-national differences can potentially impact metric use, which is theoretically and managerially limiting. This work develops a model that examines national and organizational cultural antecedents while controlling for the decision setting. Testing the model on data collected from 4384 managerial decisions from 1637 firms in 16 countries reveals that both levels of culture are associated with metric use but each has varying effects. Our results enable multinational executives to better understand and increase managerial metric use across different cultures and settings.

Keywords

metrics international marketing GLOBE cultural variables organizational culture managerial decision-making 

Résumé

La recherche sur les paramètres de mesure est constamment présentée comme une priorité par les chercheurs et les praticiens. Cependant, on en sait moins sur la façon don't la culture et les différences transnationales peuvent avoir un impact potentiel sur l’utilisation des mesures, ce qui présente des limites sur le plan théorique et managérial. Ce travail développe un modèle qui examine les antécédents culturels nationaux et organisationnels tout en contrôlant la prise de décision. En testant le modèle sur des données recueillies sur 4 384 décisions managériales auprès de 1 637 firmes dans 16 pays, on constate que les deux niveaux de culture sont associés à l’utilisation des mesures, mais que chacun a des effets différents. Nos résultats permettent aux dirigeants de multinationales de mieux comprendre et d’accroître l’utilisation des paramètres managériaux de mesure dans différents cultures et contextes.

Resumen

La investigación sobre métricas es constantemente señalada como una prioridad por académicos y profesionales. Sin embargo, menos es conocido sobre cómo la cultura y las diferencias entre países puede impactar potencialmente el uso de métricas, lo cual puede ser teoréticamente y gerencialmente limitante. Este trabajo desarrolla un modelo que examina los antecedentes culturales nacionales y organizacionales mientras controla el establecimiento de decisiones. Probando el modelo en los datos recolectados de 4.384 decisiones gerenciales de 1.637 empresas en 16 países se revela que ambos niveles de cultura están asociados con el uso de la métrica, pero cada uno tiene efectos variados. Nuestros resultados permiten a los ejecutivos multinacionales entender mejor y aumentar el uso gerencial de la métrica entre diferentes culturas y entornos.

Resumo

Pesquisas sobre métricas são consistentemente designadas como prioritárias por acadêmicos e profissionais. No entanto, sabe-se menos sobre como a cultura e diferenças entre países podem potencialmente afetar o uso de métricas, o que é teoricamente e gerencialmente limitante. Este trabalho desenvolve um modelo que examina os antecedentes culturais nacionais e organizacionais enquanto controla o ambiente de decisão. Testes do modelo em dados coletados de 4.384 decisões gerenciais de 1.637 empresas em 16 países revela que ambos os níveis de cultura estão associados ao uso da métrica, mas cada um tem efeitos variados. Nossos resultados permitem que os executivos multinacionais melhor compreendam e aumentem o uso gerencial de métricas em diferentes culturas e ambientes.

摘要

对学者和从业者来说, 对度量指标的研究始终是一个优先。然而, 人们对文化和跨国差异如何能潜在影响度量指标的使用知之甚少, 这在理论上和管理上都有限。这项工作开发了一个模型, 在控制决策环境的同时查验国家和组织文化的前因。用从16个国家的1,637家公司的4,384项管理决策中收集的数据来测试模型, 揭示了两种文化水平与度量指标的使用相关, 但每种都有不同的影响。我们的研究结果使跨国公司高管能更好地了解和增加跨越不同文化和环境的管理指标的使用。

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from the Marketing Science Institute (MSI), UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School, and the Beall Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the UCI Paul Merage School of Business.

Supplementary material

41267_2019_259_MOESM1_ESM.docx (90 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 90 kb)

References

  1. Aaker, J. L. 2006. Delineating culture. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4): 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramson, C., Currim, I. S., & Sarin, R. 2005. An experimental investigation of the impact of information on competitive decision making. Management Science, 51(2): 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. 2014. Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4): 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Autio, E., Pathak, S., & Wennberg, K. 2013. Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4): 334–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bass, F. M. 1995. Empirical generalizations and marketing science: A personal view. Marketing Science, 14(3): G6–G19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berthon, P., Pitt, L. F., & Ewing, M. T. 2001. Corollaries of the collective: The influence of organizational culture and memory development on perceived decision-making context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. 1998. Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3): 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2017. An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Caprar, D. V., Devinney, T. M., Kirkman, B. L., & Caligiuri, P. 2015. Conceptualizing and measuring culture in international business and management: From challenges to potential solutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9): 1011–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. 2010. From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curren, M. T., Folkes, V. S., & Steckel, J. H. 1992. Explanations for successful and unsuccessful marketing decisions: The decision maker’s perspective. Journal of Marketing, 56(2): 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Luque, M. S., & Javidan, M. 2004. Uncertainty avoidance. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 cultures: 602–653. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Leeflang, P. S. H. 2009. The role of national culture in advertising’s sensitivity to business cycles: An investigation across continents. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5): 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeSarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V., & Chatterjee, R. 1995. Analyzing constant-sum multiple criterion data: A segment-level approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2): 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E., Jr. 1993. Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deshpandé, R., & Webster, F. E., Jr. 1989. Organizational culture and marketing: Defining the research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 53(1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1988. Agency- and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 488–511.Google Scholar
  21. Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. 1994. Cross-national “laws” and differences in market response. Management Science, 40(1): 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farris, P. W., Bendle, N. T., Pfeifer, P. E., & Reibstein, D. J. 2010. Marketing metrics: The definitive guide to measuring marketing performance (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School.Google Scholar
  23. Flynn, B. B., & Saladin, B. 2006. Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context: A study of national culture. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5): 583–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forbes. 2017. Forbes marketing accountability: A CEO blueprint for driving enterprise value by maximizing the effectiveness of marketing investments, strategies, and actions. Forbes CMO Practice. http://cmo-practice.forbes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Forbes-Marketing-Accountability-Executive-Summary-10.2.17.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2019.
  25. Fournaise Marketing Group. 2012. 70% of CEOs admit they may be responsible for marketers’ poor perceived performance. https://www.fournaisegroup.com/ceos-marketers-performance. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.
  26. Fredrickson, J., & Mitchell, T. 1984. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2): 399–423.Google Scholar
  27. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Griffin, D., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., Li, K., & Shao, L. 2017. National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(6): 740–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanssens, D. M. (Ed.). 2015. Empirical generalizations about marketing impact (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Henri, J.-F. 2006. Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hofstede, G. 1994. Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1): 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Krohmer, H. 1999. Marketing’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 63(2): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Huang, X., Rode, J. C., & Schroeder, R. G. 2011. Organizational structure and continuous improvement and learning: Moderating effects of cultural endorsement of participative leadership. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(9): 1103–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hult, G. T. M., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. 2019. https://ibc-static.broad.msu.edu/sites/globaledge/resources/JIBS_InternationalMarketing.pdfGoogle Scholar
  38. Institute for the Study of Business Markets. 2008, 2010, 2012. B-To-B marketing trends. University Park, PA: The Institute for the Study of Business Markets.Google Scholar
  39. Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & de Luque, M. S. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 897–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jennrich, R. I. 2006. Rotation to simple loadings using component loss functions: The oblique case. Psychometrika, 71(1): 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kale, P., & Singh, H. 2007. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. 2006. A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. 2017. A retrospective on culture’s consequences: The 35-year journey. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lalwani, A. K., & Forcum, L. 2016. Does a dollar get you a dollar’s worth of merchandise? The impact of power distance belief on price–quality judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2): 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lehmann, D. R., & Reibstein, D. J. 2006. Marketing metrics and financial performance. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  47. Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. 2005. Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lukovitz, K. 2012, November 15. Survey probes the “CEO-marketer divide.” Media Post: Marketing Daily. https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/187276/survey-probes-the-ceo-marketer-divide.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2019.
  50. Marketing Science Institute. 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018. Research priorities: A guide to MSI research programs and procedures. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  51. McGovern, G. J., Court, D., Quelch, J. A., & Crawford, B. 2004. Bringing customers into the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 82(11): 70–80.Google Scholar
  52. Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., Adidam, P. T., & Edison, S. W. 1999. Antecedents and consequences of marketing strategy making: A model and a test. Journal of Marketing, 63(2): 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mintz, O., & Currim, I. S. 2013. What drives managerial use of marketing and financial metrics and does metric use affect performance of marketing-mix activities? Journal of Marketing, 77(2): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moorman, C. 1995. Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3): 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moorman, C., & Day, G. S. 2016. Organizing for marketing excellence. Journal of Marketing, 80(6): 6–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morgan, N. A., Anderson, E. W., & Mittal, V. 2005. Understanding firms’ customer satisfaction information usage. Journal of Marketing, 69(3): 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. 2009. Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 73(1): 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morgan, N. A., & Vorhies, D. W. 2018. The business performance outcomes of market orientation culture and behaviors. In R. Varadarajan & S. Jayachandran (Eds.), Innovation and strategy: 255–282. Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. 2010. The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4): 849–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Naor, M., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. 2010. The globalization of operations in Eastern and Western countries: Unpacking the relationship between national and organizational culture and its impact on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3): 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. 1996. Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4): 753–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nippa, M., & Reuer, J. J. 2019. On the future of international joint venture research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4): 555–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Sullivan, D., & Abela, A. V. 2007. Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(2): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Sullivan, D., Abela, A. V., & Hutchinson, M. 2009. Marketing performance measurement and firm performance: Evidence from the European high-technology sector. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6): 843–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Perkins, W. S., & Rao, R. C. 1990. The role of experience in information use and decision making by marketing managers. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roberts, P. W., & Greenwood, R. 1997. Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption. Academy of Management Review, 22(2): 346–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roth, M. S. 1995. The effects of culture and socioeconomics on the performance of global brand image strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2): 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rucker, D. D., Hu, M., & Galinsky, A. D. 2014. The experience versus the expectations of power: A recipe for altering the effects of power on behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. 2004. Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4): 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schuler, R. S., & Rogovsky, N. 1998. Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schulze, C., Skiera, B., & Wiesel, T. 2012. Linking customer and financial metrics to shareholder value: The leverage effect in customer-based valuation. Journal of Marketing, 76(2): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4): 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shavitt, S., Lalwani, A. K., Zhang, J., & Torelli, C. J. 2006. The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4): 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. 2005. A dangerous divergence: Marketing and society. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(1): 160–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singh, J. 1995. Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stahl, G. K., & Tung, R. L. 2015. Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross‐national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1): 78–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. 1999. A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63(2): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K., Watson, R. T., Clapper, D. L., & Mclean, E. R. 1998. Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44(9): 1263–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Triandis, H. C. 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3): 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Triandis, H. C. 1996. The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4): 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tung, R. L., & Stahl, G. K. 2018. The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we are headed. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9): 1167–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tung, R. L., & Verbeke, A. 2010. Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8): 1259–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157): 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. 2009. Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Verhoef, P. C., Leeflang, P. S. H., Reiner, J., Natter, M., Baker, W., Grinstein, A., et al. 2011. A cross-national investigation into the marketing department’s influence within the firm: Toward initial empirical generalizations. Journal of International Marketing, 19(3): 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vora, D., Martin, L., Fitzsimmons, S. R., Pekerti, A. A., Lakshman, C., & Raheem, S. 2018. Multiculturalism within individuals: A review, critique, and agenda for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50:499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. White, J. C., Varadarajan, P. R., & Dacin, P. A. 2003. Market situation interpretation and response: The role of cognitive style, organizational culture, and information use. Journal of Marketing, 67(3): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Whitler, K. A., Krause, R., & Lehmann, D. R. 2018. When and how board members with marketing experience facilitate firm growth. Journal of Marketing, 82(5): 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wirtz, J., Kuppelwieser, V. G., & Tuzovic, S. 2014. The role of marketing in today’s enterprises. Journal of Service Management, 25(2): 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yarbrough, L., Morgan, N. A., & Vorhies, D. W. 2011. The impact of product market strategy—organizational culture fit on business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4): 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zaheer, S., & Zaheer, A. 1997. Country effects on information seeking in global electronic networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ofer Mintz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Imran S Currim
    • 2
  • Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp
    • 3
  • Martijn de Jong
    • 4
  1. 1.UTS Business SchoolUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Beall Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Paul Merage School of BusinessUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  3. 3.Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Department of Business Economics - Section MarketingErasmus School of EconomicsRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations